Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sijo Joseph vs M/S Hdb Financial Services Ltd
2023 Latest Caselaw 8843 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8843 Ker
Judgement Date : 14 August, 2023

Kerala High Court
Sijo Joseph vs M/S Hdb Financial Services Ltd on 14 August, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
TRE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V. RUNHIKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 1478 pay OF AUGUST 2093 / 23RD SRAVANA, 1945
WIC) NO. 10309 OF 2025

SIQ0 JOSEPH, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O JOSEPH V.V.,
VATTAPARSMBIL HOUSE, PAZHANGANAQU, KIZHAKSAMBAL AM
P.O... ERNARULAN DISTRICY, PIN - §83562

BY ADS.

& HAR THARAN

PRAVEEN HM.

KS. SMITHA

VOR. SANJEEV KUMAR

GENTLE C.D.

RESPONDENTS :

4 M/S HOS FINANCIAL SERVICES LTO.

2ND FLOOR, OQOR NO. T1/275 02, KALLUMKAL BUTLOING, COLONY STOP, VAEHAKKALA, THRIKKAKARA P.O., RAKKANAD, COCHIN, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682029

2 STATION NOUSE OFFICER, THADIYITTAPARAMBU POLICE STATION, ALUVA - MUNNAR ROAD, VAZHAKULAM, ERNAKULAN, PIN ~ 683105

3 JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT GFEICER, SUR-REGTONAL TRANSPORT OFEICE, MUNICIPAL SHOPPING COMPLEX BUILDING, PATTAL, IRTNGOLE P.6, SH 48, PERAMBAVGOR, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683545 BY ADVS.

MARY PT CAROLIN SINDHU VAZ(K/716/1998) R.S.REGITHA(K/7 73/2087 } HARSHITHA HASHIM(K/O02 7960/2023 } ALEENA SHAJU(K/O81176/ 2023) ANUSHA JOY{K/801354/2023}

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSTON ON 34.85.2025, THE COURT ON TRE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING :

bo

WPC LOS99/2083

PV. RONHIRRISHNAN, dF,

IK, POE ANN: OD. PO

WP(C).N a309 of 2023

Dated this the ig™ day of August, 2029

The above writ petition is fled with the following prayers:

() To pass such orsers or reliefs as this Issue a writ of mandamus ar any other appropriate writ or order commanding the znd respondent to consider and take follow ap action on Exhibi PG complaint fled by the petifioner against the ist respondent and their henchmen withont any further delay taking nefe of the dictum laid down by the Apex Court of India in the matter of ICC!

Bank Lid. Vs. Prakash Baur reported in goo (2) SOS va

GD Issue a writ of mandamus or any other

appropriate writ ar order commanding the ard respondent to consider and take follow up action on Exhibi.Py

fy

eomplaint fled te the pefifianer against the ist respondent and their henchmen witht any further delay taking note af the dictrrm lakd down by the Apex Court of India In the matter of FCICT Bank Lic Vs. Prakash Kaur reported in

ear £2 y SCC Fut.

) Restrain the ist respondent from selling the

vehicle mentioned In Exhibit. P: without providing the petitioner with an opportunity to get back the vehicle by

WEC 1030/2023 3

regidarizing the loan and also on payment of a prescribed amount to be determined by this Hon'ble Court.

(iv) Petitioner may be permitted to dispense with the filing of translation of the vernacular documents. And

iv} To pass such orders or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems {ff in the lyterest of fustics.

Sic}

2, When this writ petition came up for consideration, beth sides submitted that the matter is settled and a memorandum of

settlement is Aled before the Kerala State Mediation and Canciiiation

fe

Centre, High Court of Rerala and the same is also produced before this Court. This writ petition can be disposed of in tune with the same,

Therefore, this writ petition can be dispased of In tune with the memorandum of settlement dated og.o7.ao993. Memorandum of

settlement dated o3.07.20283 will form part of this judgment.

Sd/-

Pp, V. RUNUIARISHNAN FUDGE

Shaa/

PETITIQNER EXHIRITS EXRLBLi pl

Exhibit

Exhibit

EXALDLE

EXALit

Exhibit

Exhasit

ExAibit

Exhibit

Exhibit -

pe

pS

FRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF BUS NO. BL-O7A-7A7S

TRUE COPY OF TNE CONTRACT CARRETAGE PERNTT ESSUED SY THE SND RESPONDENT IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER FOR THE VEHICLE MENTIONED IN EXRIBIT PL ON 83,98. 2928

TRUE COPY OF THE PITNESS CERTIFICATE TSSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE VEHICLE MENTIONED IN EXHIBIT. Pi ON 22,18. 2927

TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTS PSSUEQ BY THE EST RESPONDENT IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER FOR THE PERTOO COMMENCING FROM 20.07.2019 TO 16.03.2023 TRUE COPY OF THE JUOQGMENT IN THE MATTER QF ICXCLT BANK LTD. YS. PRAKASH KAUR REPORTER IN 2o07 (2) SCC Fil

TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 25.03.2023 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT

YRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 16.93.2829 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SRD RESPONDENT

YRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 24.83.2823 SENT BY THE IST RESPONDENT ADDRESSED TO THE GUARANTOR OF THE LOAN AVATLED BY THE PETITIONER

A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND DRAFT FOR & SUN OF RS.5,00,000/- DRAWN IN THE NAME OF THE RESPONSENT ON 28.04.2029

& TRUE PHOTOGRAPH TAKEN AT THE OFFICE OF THE IST RESPONDENT ALONG WITH THE ORIGINAL DEMAND DRAFT OF RS.5, 6a, O6¢/- DRAWN IN FAVOR OF THE IST RESPONDENT

BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF RERALA AT ERNAKULAM

W.P.C. No.10309 of 2023

Sic foseph > Petitioner

M/s HIDS Financial Services Lid <: Respondents

SE

REPORT SUBMEPTED BY TEE MEDIATOR |

Matter settled and terms of settlement along is attached herewith.

Dated this the Ard

' : eee ae scene

Adt. AR. George Mediator BRroakulam Mediation Centre

BEPORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COORT OF KERALA AT ERNARULAM

W.P.C. No.10309 of 2023

Sijo Joseph > Bettoner Vs.

M's HDB Financial Services Lal : Respondents

9 0 F_CIVEL PROCEDURE : READ WITH RULES 24. _& 28 OF THE CIVIL -PROCEDURE

'The dispate covered In the above case was referred for Court annexed mediation, and was mediated by Mr AJR. George, Advocate and accredbed trained mediator and parties have agreed to settle the dispute as

ander

i. The Petitioner and 1° Respondent resolved the entire dispute involved in this case and settled the matter for the total sum of Rs,5,00,000/-(Rupees mine lakhs only}

2. The 2" Respondent has accepted the above emount Rs.5 00,0004 Rupees nine lakhs only) and underigken to release the vehicle in daestion to the Petinionerfor to the person nominated by the Petitioner at the earliest with all relevant decumenis. While reigasing the vehicle the Petitioner undertakes to pay the yan rent fred iy de perscn.

Respondents 2 & 3 are proforma parties to this settlement, and | wnce

&

they need not by signatories to this s terms ats setement.

x : = Bi. ala State Mediation ASR LANE ee Pg *

4. In view

above Writ Petition be treated as closed

Thated this the Srd day of July

"Petitioner

Sijo Joseph

O os ~ Xe f <\ ur y) 3 ark ' Ase r kes Bd i. Co sanse| fe r Petiliongr Los a ' SN ° P Moe as , ORNS mae yO i é

of above setthement arrived at bx

bath parthes

Res

Counsel for Responden

agree that t

> Ny

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter