Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sreemathy Balakrishnan vs State Of Kerala
2023 Latest Caselaw 8808 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8808 Ker
Judgement Date : 14 August, 2023

Kerala High Court
Sreemathy Balakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 14 August, 2023
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
     MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 23RD SRAVANA, 1945
                       WP(C) NO. 18748 OF 2023
PETITIONERS:

    1     SREEMATHY BALAKRISHNAN,
          AGED 93 YEARS
          W/O LATE N.BALAKRISHNAN, NJATTUVETTY HOUSE, RESIDING AT
          KALIBHAVAN, THANNYAM VILLAGE, PERINGOTTUKARA P.O.
          THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680565

    2     ABHAYA.N.B,
          AGED 64 YEARS
          D/O LATE N.BALAKRISHNAN, NJATTUVETTY HOUSE, RESIDING AT
          KALIBHAVAN, THANNYAM VILLAGE, PERINGOTTUKARA P.O.
          THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680565

          BY ADVS.
          VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE
          SUSANTH SHAJI
          ALBIN A. JOSEPH
          AMRITHA.J
          TINCY MARIA SCARIA
          VIPIN C. VARGHESE



RESPONDENTS:

    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS,
          SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM, PIN - 682031

    2     THE STATE POLICE CHIEF,
          POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
          PIN - 695010

    3     THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL)
          KALYAN NAGAR, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR, PIN - 680003

    4     THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
          IRINJALAKKUDA, STATE HIGHWAY-22, MUKUNDAPURAM,
          THRISSUR, PIN - 680125

    5     THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
          ANTHIKKAD POLICE STATION, ANTHIKKAD, THRISSUR (RURAL)
 WP(C) NO. 18748 OF 2023

                                 2

            THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680641

     6      SALIM
            AGE, FATHER'S NAME AND ADDRESS ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE
            PETITIONER PHONE NO.9744239505 ADDRESS CORRECTED THE
            ADDRESS OF THE 6TH RESPONDENT IS CORRECTED AS SALEEM,
            AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL RAHMAN, PANIKKAVEETIL HOUSE,
            VALLACHIRA, URAKAM, CHATHAKUDAM-680562 AS PER THE
            ORDER DATED 03.08.2023 IN I.A. NO.1/2023 IN WP(C)
            18748/2023.

            BY ADVS.
            ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA
            Chacko C A
            C.M.CHARISMA(K/424/2002)



OTHER PRESENT:

            SRI. RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE, GP




      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 18748 OF 2023

                                         3

                     P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
               -------------------------------
                   W.P.(C)No.18748 of 2023
              --------------------------------
           Dated this the 14th day of August, 2023

                                 JUDGMENT

Above writ petition is filed seeking the following prayers:

(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or other appropriate writ, directing the respondents 2 to 5 herein or the concerned among them to render adequate and meaningful police protection to the petitioners in the matter of their life and property against acts of threats and violences interferences, criminal offences, threatened to be committed by the 6th respondent and persons under him.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or other appropriate writ, directing the respondents 3 to 5 to take immediate and emergent measures to see that persons like the 6th respondent are not entering into the premises where the two lady petitioners are residing and they are not subjected to any harassment by such persons by threats of suicide or criminal offences or in any other manner whatsoever to secure ends of justice to them."

2. The 1st petitioner is a lady aged 93 years and the 2 nd petitioner is

a divorcee aged 64 years. The 1st petitioner's son died on 01.09.2012. The

grievance of the petitioners is that the 6th respondent herein came to the

premises of the petitioners and threatening that he would commit

suicide if the amount due to him from the son of the 1 st petitioner is not WP(C) NO. 18748 OF 2023

paid by the petitioners. The petitioners submitted that they are not

aware about any money transaction between the 1 st petitioner's son and

the 6th respondent. Now the further grievance of the petitioners is that

there is apprehension of danger to the life of the petitioners from the 6 th

respondent, hence this writ petition.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned

Government Pleader and the learned counsel appearing for the 6th

respondent.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the 6 th respondent has

submitted that there is absolutely no threat from their side to the

petitioners and it is the case of the 6 th respondent that some amount is

due from the son of the 1st petitioner to him.

5. The learned Government Pleader submits that, there is only a

money transaction dispute between the petitioners and the 6 th

respondent and if there is any threat to the life of the petitioners, the

Police will do the needful.

6. If that is the case, this writ petition itself can be disposed of

recording the submission of the 6th respondent that there is no threat to

the life of the petitioners from the side of the 6 th respondent and that if WP(C) NO. 18748 OF 2023

there is any such threat in future, the petitioners can be allowed to file a

complaint before the 5th respondent and the 5th respondent will do the

needful to see that there is no threat to the life of the petitioners. But I

make it clear that if there is any money transaction between the 6 th

respondent and the deceased son of the 1st petitioner and the 6th

respondent wants to initiate any proceedings, he is free to do the same

in accordance with law. Therefore, this writ petition can be disposed of

with the following directions:

1. The submission of the 6th respondent that there is no threat to

the life of the petitioners from his side is recorded.

2. If there is any threat to the life of the petitioners from the 6 th

respondent in future, the petitioners are free to submit a complaint

before the 5th respondent and the 5th respondent will do the needful to

see that the life of the petitioners are protected.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE SVP WP(C) NO. 18748 OF 2023

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18748/2023

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 31.05.2023 SUBMITTED TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT

Exhibit P2 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED FROM THE SHO DATED 01.06.2023

Exhibit P3 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 31.05.2023 SUBMITTED TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT

Exhibit P4 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED FROM THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 01.06.2023

Exhibit P5 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 31.05.2023 SUBMITTED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT

Exhibit P6 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REGISTRATION SLIP PERTAINING TO THE REQUEST THAT WAS SENT THROUGH REGISTERED POST TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 31.05.2023

Exhibit P7 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 31.05.2023 SUBMITTED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter