Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8417 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 16TH SRAVANA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 22938 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
KUNNATHUKAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO. 1101
KUNNATHUKAL.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 504.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT.
BY ADVS.
B.S.SWATHI KUMAR
ANITHA RAVINDRAN
HARISANKAR N UNNI
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION
CO-BANK TOWERS, VIKAS BHAVAN, PALAYAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 033.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
2 THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
(GENERAL), NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
PIN - 695 141.
3 ADDL. R3. V.UDAYA KUMAR,
AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.VIKRAMAN PANICKER,
V.S.BHAVAN, NILAMAMOODU, CHERIYAKOLLA.P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 504.
4 ADDL. R4. G. KUMAR,
AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. GOPINATHAN NAIR,
ARCHANA MOOPPUKALA KUNNATHUKAL, KARAKONAM P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 504.
W.P.(C)No.22938/2023 2
5 ADDL. R5. VIJAY LOVLIN A.J.,
S/O. ANTONY BABU,
LOVLIN NIVAS, UNDANCODE, MEKKINKARA, VALIYAKAL,
ELLUVILA P.O.-695 504.
IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 26.07.2023 IN
I.A.1/2023 IN THE WP(C).
BY ADVS.
C.M.NAZAR
SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY
K.R.RIJA
RESHMI THOMAS (GP)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
07.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C)No.22938/2023 3
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Co-operative
Society, registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies
Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The Managing
Committee of the Society resolved to conduct fresh elections
to the Managing Committee on 20-08-2023 from 8.00 A.M. to
4.00 P.M. at LMS Upper Primary School, Kottukonam and the
resolution was duly forwarded to the competent authority in
terms of Ext.P1. The petitioner was thereafter served with
Ext.P3 communication by the Assistant Registrar of Co-
operative Societies stating that there have been certain
complaints that membership has not been granted by the
Society to several persons eligible to obtain such membership.
Subsequently the petitioner was served with an order dated
07-07-2023 of the 2nd respondent stating that since
membership has not been given to certain eligible persons, the
resolution to hold the elections must be taken afresh after
granting membership to eligible persons.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
would submit that there is absolutely no rhyme or reason for
the 2nd respondent to refuse to act on the resolution taken by
the Managing Committee to hold elections on 20-08-2023. It
is submitted that the statute contemplates a definite
procedure for the purposes of adjudication of claims for
membership and unless the right to membership is established
by adopting that procedure, the 2nd respondent could not have
taken it up on himself to withhold the resolution for holding
the elections. It is submitted that the 2 nd respondent cannot
adjudicate on the rights of membership and therefore the
decision taken by him not to act on the resolution taken by the
Managing Committee to hold elections on 20-08-2023 is
clearly without jurisdiction. It is submitted that the
consequent communication issued by the State Co-operative
Election Commission (Ext.P6) on the basis of the information
provided by the 2nd respondent that memberships have been
denied to several persons is also clearly illegal. It is submitted
that though the term of the Managing Committee is till
20-10-2023, it is open to the Managing Committee to decide
the holding of elections on any earlier date, as has been held
by this Court in Managing Committee, Thiruvalla East Co-
operative Bank Ltd. v. State Co-operative Election
Commission, Tvm and Others; 2016 (4) KHC 703 , which
has been followed by this Court in Ext.P7 judgment in
W.P.(C)No.15779 of 2023.
3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the
State Co-operative Election Commission would submit that the
State Co-operative Election Commission had only acted on the
information provided by the Assistant Registrar and therefore
there is no illegality whatsoever in Ext.P6 communication.
4. The learned Government Pleader would also support
the stand taken by the 2nd respondent and contend that when
it is clear that elections were being held earlier to deny the
membership claim of eligible persons, which has a direct
bearing on the election results, the 2 nd respondent was right in
not taking action on the basis of the resolution for holding
elections on 20-08-2023.
5. The learned counsel appearing for additional
respondents 3 to 5 (persons who had applied for membership)
would submit that in the facts of the present case it is clear
that the resolution to hold elections on an earlier date was to
defeat democratic process by denying membership to eligible
persons. It is submitted that there is a clear finding by the 2 nd
respondent that large number of applications for membership
have been unnecessarily kept pending by the Managing
Committee of the Society, without processing them. It is
submitted that holding of elections in such circumstances
would clearly be contrary to the interest of the Society and to
democratic principles. It is submitted that the only reason for
denying membership to eligible persons is to ensure that, only
persons who are favourable to the present Managing
Committee, are granted membership in the Society. It is
submitted that since the term of the Society is till October
2023 and since there were complaints regarding denial of
membership to eligible persons, there is nothing wrong in the
proceedings of respondents 1 and 2 in refusing to hold
elections on 20-08-2023, on the basis of the resolution passed
by the Managing Committee.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner,
the learned Standing Counsel for the State Co-operative
Election Commission, the learned Government Pleader for the
2nd respondent and the learned counsel appearing for
additional respondents 3 to 5, I am of the view that the issues
stand covered in favour of the petitioner by virtue of the
judgment of this Court in W.P.(C)No.22430/2023. There, the
question considered was, whether the elections to the
Managing Committee could be postponed on the ground that
there were complaints regarding denial of membership. In
paragraph No.6 of the judgment in W.P.(C)No.22430/2023, I
have held as follows:
"6. Having heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State Co-operative Election Commission and Adv. M.Sasindran, for additional respondents 4 to 11, I am of the opinion that the petitioner is entitled to succeed. The provisions of the Section 16 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') contemplate a procedure for determination of the question as to whether a person is eligible for membership or not. The provisions of sub-section (2A) of Section 16 of the Act, provide that when an application for membership in a Society is not disposed of within the time specified in sub-section (2) of the Act, the Registrar shall be bound, on the written request of the applicant, to determine whether such membership shall be given or not. The provisions of sub-section (2) of Section 16 of the Act provide that a decision on the application for membership shall be taken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the application. A combined reading of the provisions contained in sub-section (2), (2A) and (2B) of Section 16 of the Act makes it clear that the question as to whether the membership was illegality denied to any person by a Society, is a matter that has to be determined in the manner provided for in those provisions. The State Co- operative Election Commission is not called upon to defer any election or refuse to act on a resolution passed by the Society for holding elections on a particular day on the ground that there
are complaints regarding denial of memberships to eligible persons, by the Society in question. It is clear from the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for the State Co-operative Election Commission that the applications for membership were pending from the month of May, 2022. If that be the case it is clear from the provisions of Section 16 of the Act that the persons aggrieved had to resort to the provisions in sub- section (2A) of Section 16 of the Act if they had a grievance that the membership had been illegally denied to them. Having failed to do so it cannot be contended at the time when a resolution had been forwarded for the purposes of holding elections, that the elections should not be held for the reason that there was illegal denial of membership. In that view of the matter and taking into consideration the fact that a fresh resolution has been forwarded to the State Co-operative Election Commission, for holding elections on 04-09-2023, and also taking into consideration the submission of the learned Standing Counsel for the State Co-operative Election Commission that the said resolution has not been received through the Registrar of Co- operative Societies, this writ petition will stand disposed of with the following directions:
(i) The Registrar of Co-operative Societies shall forward the resolution passed by the Managing Committee of the petitioner-Society for holding of elections on 04-09-2023 to the State Co-operative Election Commission forthwith;
(ii) On receipt of such resolution the State Co- operative Election Commission shall take steps to hold the elections in compliance with the provisions of Rule 35A of the Co-operative Rules 1969 without any further delay and in a manner ensuring that the elections are held and the results are declared before the term of the existing managing committee expires."
In the facts of the present case, the learned counsel for the
petitioner is right in contending that the 2 nd respondent
(Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies) had no
jurisdiction to decide any complaint regarding denial of
membership, which can be done only in terms of the provisions
contained in Section 16 of the Act.
7. Similarly, the mere fact that the Managing
Committee had taken a resolution to hold elections nearly two
months prior to the date on which the term of the present
committee would expire is no ground to hold that the
elections need not be conducted on the date selected by the
Managing Committee in terms of the resolution forwarded for
the consideration of the State Election Commission. The
judgment of this Court in Managing Committee, Thiruvalla
East Co-operative Bank Ltd. (supra), is authority for the
proposition that there is absolutely no illegality in a resolution
being adopted much earlier than the 60 days period mandated
by the provisions of Rule 35 A of the Co-operative Societies
Rules, 1969, for forwarding a resolution for holding elections
to the Managing Committee of a Society. That apart, as
already observed, I am of the view that unless the right to
membership is adjudicated in terms of the provisions
contained in Section 16(4) of the Act, it would not be proper
for the authority to withhold the conduct of elections on the
ground that there were complaints regarding denial of
membership to eligible persons. For all these reasons, this writ
petition is allowed and the following directions are issued:
(i) The petitioner-Society shall immediately take a fresh
resolution for holding elections to the Managing Committee of
the Society and forward the same for consideration of the 2 nd
respondent;
(ii) The 2nd respondent shall immediately (on receipt of
the resolution) forward the same to the 1 st respondent for the
purposes of notifying the elections. The fact that there are
complaints regarding denial of membership shall not be a
ground to refuse the holding of elections in terms of the
resolution to be passed by the Society.
(iii) Any complaints raised by the respondents 3 to 5 and
others regarding denial of membership shall be adjudicated by
the competent authority, in accordance with the law.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE ats
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 22938/2023
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION NO. TVM/1516/2023 DATED 15-6-2023 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO. 21/23 DATED 15-6-2023 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO. NEYY.
1405/2023 DATED 29-5-2023 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.
E(2)3777/2023/SCEC DATED 22-6-2023 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. NEYY. 1531/2023 DATED 7-7-2023 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. E(2)3777/2023/SCEC DATED 6-7-2023 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C)NO.
15779/2023 DATED 30-5-2023
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS
Exhibit-R3(a) A true copy of application submitted by the 3rd respondent before the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies Neyyattinkara dated 11.07.2023
Exhibit-R3(b) A true copy of application of the addl.4th respondent
Exhibit-R3(c) A true copy of the communication No.1531/2023 of the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies Neyyattinkara
Exhibit-3(d) A true copy of communication dated 27.06.2023 by the 2nd respondent addressed to the 1st respondent
Exhibit-R3(e) A true copy of the letter addressed to Arun.H.S an applicant dated 26.06.2023
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!