Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

John Raphy vs The District Geologist
2023 Latest Caselaw 8399 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8399 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2023

Kerala High Court
John Raphy vs The District Geologist on 7 August, 2023
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                            PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
  MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 16TH SRAVANA, 1945
                    WP(C) NO. 18339 OF 2023
PETITIONER:

         JOHN RAPHY
         AGED 53 YEARS
         S/O. JOSEPH AGED 53 YEARS, KANJIRATHINGAL HOUSE,
         MULLASSERI (PO), THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680509

         BY ADV BINOY VASUDEVAN


RESPONDENTS:

    1    THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST
         OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST,
         MINI CIVIL STATION, CHEMBUKKAVU,
         THRISSUR, PIN - 680020
    2    THE VILLAGE OFFICER
         KILLANNUR VILLAGE MULANKUNNATHUKKAVU P.O.,
         THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680020


         SMT. K M RESHMI, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER


     THIS WRIT PETITION       (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP    FOR
ADMISSION ON 07.08.2023,      THE COURT ON THE SAME     DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) No.18339 of 2023

                              2


                         JUDGMENT

Dated this the 7th day of August, 2023

The petitioner, who is owner in possession of 20.34

Ares of land in Killannur Village of Thrissur Taluk in Thrissur

District, has approached this Court seeking to direct the

1st respondent-District Geologist to issue Transit Passes to

the petitioner after accepting the royalty as contained in Rule

14(2) of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015,

as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within a time

frame fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner states that he is owner in

possession of 20.34 Ares of land in Survey Nos.1399/7PT

and 1399/10PT of Killannur Village in Thrissur Taluk of

Thrissur District. The petitioner came into possession of the

property under Ext.P1 document.

3. As the petitioner wanted to construct residential

houses, applications for Building Permit and Development WP(C) No.18339 of 2023

Permit were submitted. Permits were granted by the local

authority. The petitioner approached the 1 st respondent for

issuance of Transit Pass for removal of ordinary earth for the

construction of residential houses.

4. When the petitioner approached the

1st respondent for Transit Pass for removal of ordinary earth,

the 1st respondent has taken a stand that the property being

a patta land, Transit Pass cannot be issued. It is aggrieved

by the said stand taken by the 1 st respondent that the

petitioner is before this Court.

5. The counsel for the petitioner argued that the

petitioner is desirous of constructing residential buildings.

This Court considered the issue of construction of residential

buildings in patta land. In the judgment in W.P.(C) No. 4782

of 2022 delivered in identical circumstances, this Court

granted permission for such constructions and directed the

Geologist to issue Transit Pass. The petitioner is also

entitled to identical relief.

WP(C) No.18339 of 2023

6. Government Pleader entered appearance and

resisted the writ petition. The Government Pleader opposed

all material allegations raised by the petitioner in the writ

petition. The Government Pleader pointed out that Ext.P6 is

the Patta issued to the predecessor of the petitioner. Ext.P6

was issued assigning the land for agricultural purposes.

When the land is assigned specifically for agricultural

purposes, the holder of Patta or his successors cannot use

the said land for any other purpose. Now, the petitioner

wants to effect constructions in the land assigned for

agricultural purposes. It is not permissible.

7. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

and the learned Government Pleader representing the

respondents.

8. From the pleadings in the writ petition, it appears

that this Court considered the very same issue in W.P.(C)

No.4782 of 2022. This Court in the judgment held as WP(C) No.18339 of 2023

follows:-

"3. It is evident from Exts.P9 to P12 that the construction of residential buildings is not prohibited in the assigned land. There is also no contention for the respondents that the land is not alienable. It is also not disputed that use for residential purposes will not be a violation of the conditions of the assignment. The development permit is ancillary to the building permit and the removal of the ordinary earth is only for the purpose of effecting the construction. As such, the reasons stated in Ext.P8 are not legally sustainable. The Senior Government Pleader pointed out condition No.8 in Exts.P9 to P12 and submitted that there is a requirement that the assignee or any member of his family and successor-in-interest shall reside in/cultivate the land and that such residence/cultivation shall commence within the period of one year from the date of receipt of the patta. I do not think condition No.8 can have any bearing on the facts of this case. The patta was issued as early as 23.5.1980 and there is no case for the respondent that there has been a violation of any of the conditions of the patta from 1980, till the date of transfer of the property to the petitioner. It is also evident that the petitioner only seeks to use the land for residential purposes, which is an activity permitted as per the assignment. It is also evident that whoever resides in the property will be a successor- in-interest, since alienation is permitted.

4. In the result, the writ petition is allowed. Ext.P8 is quashed. The 1st respondent is directed to consider the application submitted by the petitioner for transit passes and grant the same if the petitioner is otherwise entitled. It is made clear that this judgment will not in any manner affect the reservations available to the Government as per the Land Assignment Rules."

WP(C) No.18339 of 2023

The above judgment will apply to the facts of the petitioner's

case.

In the circumstances, the writ petition is allowed

following the judgment in W.P.(C) No.4782 of 2022.

Consequently, there will be a direction to the 1 st respondent-

District Geologist to consider the application for Transit

Passes submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law,

and grant Transit Passes to the petitioner, if the petitioner is

otherwise eligible, within a period of one month.

Sd/-

N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk WP(C) No.18339 of 2023

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18339/2023

PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.1190/2011 DATED 17.03.2011 OF S.R.O.THRISSUR Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 09.05.2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION, LOCATION AND NON-LA CERTIFICATE DATED 19.05.2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED BY THE MULLANKUNNATHUKKAVU GRAMA PANCHAYAT VIDE NO.A3-

                  BA(169205)/2023 DATED 16.05.2023
Exhibit P5        TRUE         COPY         OF         ORDER
                  NO.DOTHR-DMG/1162/2023-E             DATED
                  31.05.2023, THE 1ST RESPONDENT
Exhibit P6        TRUE COPY OF THE PATTA ISSUED UNDER
                  RULE    9(2)    OF   THE     KERALA   LAND
                  ASSIGNMENT      RULES,      1964     DATED
                  23.10.1974
Exhibit P7        TRUE   COPY   OF   THE   JUDGMENT    DATED

10.05.2022 IN W.P.(C)NO. 4782 OF 2022 Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.06.2022 IN W.P.(C)NO.16226 OF 2022 Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.04.2023 IN W.P.(C)NO.12214 OF 2023

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter