Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4704 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
Wednesday, the 12th day of April 2023 / 22nd Chaithra, 1945
CM.APPL.NO.1/2022 IN WA NO. 1608 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.07.2022 IN WP(C) 18537/2020 OF THIS COURT
PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 IN W.P.(C):
1. THE MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY/COMMISSIONER, ERANHIPALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673006
2. THE COMMISSIONER, THE MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD, ERANHIPALAM P.O.,
KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673006
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1 AND 4 IN W.P.(C):
1. E. SASIDHARAN EMBRANDIRI, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O. E KRISHNAN EMBRANDIRI,
KEEZ SANTHI, SREE THRUPPALLAVOOR DEVASWOM, CHITTOOR TALUK, PALAKKAD
DISTRICT, PIN - 678688
2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, REVENUE (DEVASWOM)
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , PIN - 695001
3. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SREE THRUPPALLAVOOR DEVASWOM, CHITTOOR TALUK,
CHITTOOR P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678688
Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to condone the delay
of 70 days in preferring the Writ Appeal, in the interest of justice.
This Application again coming on for orders upon perusing the
application and the affidavit filed in support thereof, and this court's
order dated 04.11.2022 and upon hearing the arguments of SRI. R.LAKSHMI
NARAYAN, Advocate for the petitioners, SRI. MOHAN C.MENON, Advocate for R1
and of M/S. SUBRAMANYAN P B, P.B.KRISHNAN, SABU GEORGE, MANU VYASAN PETER
& MEERA P., Advocates for R3, the court passed the following:
S.V. BHATTI & BASANT BALAJI, JJ.
--------------------------------------------------------
C.M. Application No.1 of 2022
in
W.A. No.1608 of 2022
--------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 12th day of April, 2023
ORDER
S.V. BHATTI, J.
This is an application filed to condone the delay of 70
days in filing the writ appeal.
After appreciating the reasons stated in the affidavit
filed for condoning the delay, we are convinced that the
affidavit discloses sufficient cause for condoning the delay
in filing the writ appeal. Hence the delay in filing the writ
appeal is condoned.
Sd/-
S.V. BHATTI JUDGE
Sd/-
BASANT BALAJI JUDGE
bpr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!