Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Sivaprasad vs State Of Kerala
2022 Latest Caselaw 11111 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11111 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 November, 2022

Kerala High Court
K.Sivaprasad vs State Of Kerala on 10 November, 2022
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                    PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
   THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 19TH KARTHIKA, 1944
                           OP NO. 7708 OF 2003
PETITIONER:

            K.SIVAPRASAD, MANAGING DIRECTOR,
            PLANTATION CORPORATION OF KERALA LTD.,
            KOTTAYAM.
            BY ADVS.
            SRI.G.P.SHINOD
            SHRI.AJIT G ANJARLEKAR
            SRI.GOVIND PADMANAABHAN
            SRI.RAM MOHAN.G.


RESPONDENTS:

    1       STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
            DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
            SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
    2       ADDL.R2: MATSYAFED (KERALA STATE CORPORATE FEDERATION
            FOR FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT) REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING
            DIRECTOR, MATSYAFED HEAD OFFICE, KAMALESWARAM, MANACAUD
            P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695009
    3       ADDL. R3: THE STATE FARMING CORPORATION OF KERALA LTD.,
            (A GOVERNMENT OF KERALA UNDERTAKING), HAVING ITS
            REGISTERED OFFICE AT FARM HOUSE, P.B.NO.13, VETTITHITTA
            POST (VIA) ALIMUKKU, PUNALUR, KOLLAM, KERALA,
            REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.


            BY ADVS.
            SRI.T.P.PRADEEP, SC, MATSYAFED
            SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH, SC, STATE FARMING CORPORATION OF
            KERALA LIMITED



     THIS     ORIGINAL   PETITION    HAVING   COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
10.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 OP NO. 7708 OF 2003

                                  2




              P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
             ------------------------------
                O.P.No. 7708 of 2003
     ----------------------------------------------
    Dated this the 10th day of November, 2022


                        JUDGMENT

The above Original Petition is filed with the

following prayers:

"(a) call for the records leading to Ext.P5 and issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ order or direction quashing Ext.P5.

(b) to stay all further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P5 pending disposal of the Original Petition.

(c) to declare that the petitioner is entitled to retain his lein as Managing Director State Farming Corporation of Kerala Ltd. as borne out by Ext.P2.

(d) to grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and necessary in the interest of justice and allow this O.P. "[SIC]

2. The Original petition is filed mainly challenging

Ext.P5 order. The brief facts are like this:

In 1987, the petitioner underwent a selection OP NO. 7708 OF 2003

process conducted by Public Enterprises Selection Board,

Government of Kerala and in the year 1988 he was

appointed as Managing Director of State Farming

Corporation of Kerala (for short SFCK). He was

appointed on deputation basis from Matsyafed initially

for a period of 5 years which was later extended for a

further period of 2 years. The period of 7 years expired

on 16.6.1995. On 16.6.1995, the Government extended

the deputation of the petitioner until further orders. The

Matsyafed objected to the extension of deputation for

such a long period and the Government directly

addressed a letter to the Managing Director, Matsyafed

informing that steps are being taken to shift the lien of

the petitioner from Matsyafed to SFCK. Exhibit P1 is the

letter. Subsequently, as per order dated 16.8.1995, the

lien of the petitioner was shifted on a permanent basis

as Managing Director, State Farming Corporation of

Kerala Ltd., as per Exhibit P2 order on the basis of the OP NO. 7708 OF 2003

decision of the cabinet. When the lien of the petitioner

was shifted as Managing Director of SFCK, there was no

scale of pay attached to the post of Managing Director,

SFCK. Hence the matter was taken up with the

Government and the Government after examining the

issue, fixed the scale of pay of Managing Director of

SFCK as per Ext.P3. From the above, it is clear that the

lien of the petitioner was shifted from 'Matsyafed' to

SFCK as the Managing Director and further the scale of

pay was fixed in Schedule B. As per order dated

31.12.1996, the petitioner was posted as the Managing

Director of Horticultural Products Development

Corporation on deputation. Subsequently the

Government as per order dated 24.9.1998, appointed

the petitioner as Managing Director of Kerala State Film

Development Corporation which was also on deputation.

After completing 3 years, the petitioner is posted as the

Managing Director of Plantation Corporation of Kerala OP NO. 7708 OF 2003

Ltd. In all these deputation postings, he was drawing

the salary of the post of Managing Director of SFCK.

Subsequently, the petitioner submitted a representation

for revision of pay scale as evident by Ext.P4. In the

representation the petitioner submitted that since his

scale of pay was not revised every five years, he was

drawing a lower scale than his subordinate officers and

requested to rectify the anomaly. In the said

representation, the petitioner received a reply dated

14.2.2003 as evident by Exhibit P5. As per Ext.P5, the

lien of the petitioner was shifted to the post of General

Manager in SFCK in the scale of 10,000 - 15,150.

According to the petitioner, this is arbitrary and illegal.

It is submitted that, this order has been passed by the

Government for which nobody had a claim or dispute.

It is submitted that the issue raised in Ext.P4 is different

and Ext.P5 order has no nexus with the claim made in

Ext.P4. It is submitted that, there was no consent from OP NO. 7708 OF 2003

the petitioner also before shifting the lien. It is also

submitted that the shifting of the lien to the post of

General Manager, SFCK is without the consent and

concurrence of the petitioner. It is specifically contented

in the writ petition that the lien to a post can not be

shifted at the whims and fancy of the Government. The

scale of pay of the post of General Manager as shown in

Ext.P5 is 10,000 - 15,150. It is the case of the

petitioner that, had the petitioner continued in

Matsyafed in 1997, the petitioner would have drawn the

scale of 14,300 - 400 - 18300. A comparative table of

the scale of pay drawn by the petitioner is extracted in

the Original Petition which is also extracted hereunder:

  year        Matsyafed                  Secretariat             SFCK
              Executive                Addl. Secretary           G.M.
         (Prodn & Processing)
 1984        3350-125-4100       2250-3350 (Sp.pay 200)        1950-2950
 1987        3675-140-5115       2825-4095 (Sp.pay 300)        2470-3675
 1992         No Revision        4200-5300 (Sp.pay 300)      3000-100-5000
 1997     14300-400-18300       14000-18000 (Sp.pay 300)      10000-15150
 OP NO. 7708 OF 2003




Based on the above contention, the petitioner

challenged Ext.P5 order.

3. Heard counsel appearing for the petitioner and

the counsel appearing for the additional 2nd respondent.

I also heard the learned Government Pleader who

appeared for the 1st respondent.

4. This Court perused Ext.P5 order. The

contention raised by the petitioner in this Original

petition regarding the anomaly in fixing the scale of pay

is not properly considered in Ext.P5 order. According to

me, the Government should reconsider the matter in the

light of the contentions raised by the petitioner in this

Original petition. To facilitate the Government to

reconsider the matter, Ext.P5 can be set aside.

Therefore, this Original Petition is allowed in the

following manner:

i) Ext.P5 is set aside.

ii) The 1st respondent is directed to reconsider the OP NO. 7708 OF 2003

matter, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the

petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate,

within a period of three months from the date of

receipt of a copy of this judgment.

iii) All the contentions raised by the petitioner

in this Original petition are left open.

Sd/-

                                    P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
DM                                        JUDGE
 OP NO. 7708 OF 2003





                APPENDIX OF OP 7708/2003

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P1        TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT.30.6.1995 SENT
                  BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT.
EXHIBIT P2        TRUE     COPY          OF      THE     GOVT.ORDER

NO.GO(MS)271/95/AD DT.16.8.1995 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER NO.GO(MS)271/96/AD 16.5.1996.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT.

11.8.2000 SENT BY THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER NO.GO(MS)NO.32/2003/AD DT.14.2.2003. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE GOVT.ORDER NO.GO(MS)175/95/ID DT.2.11.95.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE GOVT.ORDER NO.GO.MS.22/98/PIG DATED 9.7.98.

RESPONDENT EXHIBITS EXHIBIT R3(1) TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF GO (MS) NO.190/88/AD DATED 03.06.1988.

EXHIBIT R3(2) TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF GO(MS) NO.390/88/AD DATED 06.12.1988.

EXHIBIT R3(3) TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF GO(RT) NO.1038/93/AD DATED 11.08.1993.

EXHIBIT R3(4) TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF GO(MS) NO.271/95/AD DATED 16.08.1995.

EXHIBIT R3(5) TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF GO(MS) NO.271/96/AD DATED 16.05.1996.

EXHIBITR3(6) TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE RELEVANT OP NO. 7708 OF 2003

EXTRACT OF THE PETITIONER'S SERVICE BOOK WITH THE ENTRY OF PAY FIXATION STATEMENT.

EXHIBIT R3(7) TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF GO(MS) NO.1802/96/AD DATED 31.12.1996.

EXHIBIT R3(8) TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF GO(MS) NO.22/98/PLG DATED 09.07.1998.

EXHIBIT R3(9) TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF GO(MS) NO.47/98/CAD DATED 24.09.1998.

EXHIBIT R3(10) TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF GO(MS) NO.32/2003/AD DATED 14.02.2003.

EXHIBIT R3(11) TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT R3(12) TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF GO(RT) NO.230/2004/ID DATED 26.06.2004.

EXHIBIT R3(13) TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF OFFICE ORDER NO.SFCK/PER/KSP/2952 DATED 09.10.07. EXHIBIT R1(a) TRUE COPY OF THE OFFICE ORDER DATED 09.10.2007.

          //TRUE COPY//              PA TO JUDGE
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter