Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Narayanankutty vs The District Collector
2022 Latest Caselaw 5901 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5901 Ker
Judgement Date : 31 May, 2022

Kerala High Court
Narayanankutty vs The District Collector on 31 May, 2022
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
        TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2022 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1944
                        WP(C) NO. 4615 OF 2022
PETITIONER:

            NARAYANANKUTTY,
            AGED 80 YEARS,
            S/O. PATHMAVATHY AMMA,
            KIZHEKKEPARAMBU, CHEVAYUR P.O.,
            KOZHIKODE 673 017.

            BY ADVS.
            N.KRISHNA RAJA MAULI
            RENI JAMES
            BINIYAMIN K.S.

RESPONDENTS:

    1       THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
            KOZHIKODE COLLECTORATE,
            WAYANAD ROAD, CIVIL STATION,
            ERANHIPPALAM, KOZHIKODE-673 020.

    2       THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
            REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
            CIVIL STATION JUMA MASJID,
            SH 29 ERANHIPPALAM, KOZHIKODE-673 020.

    3       THE TAHSILDAR,
            KOZHIKODE TALUK OFFICE,
            WAYANAD ROAD, CIVIL STATION,
            ERANHIPPALAM, KOZHIKODE 673 020.

    4       THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
            CHEVAYUR VILLAGE OFFICE,
            NGO QUARTERS, CHEVAYUR,
            KOZHIKODE-673 012.

    5       THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,
            PUTHIYARA KRISHI BHAVAN,
            PUTHIYARA, AGRICULTURAL COMPLEX,
            KOZHIKODE 673 004.

            SMT.SURYA BINOY, SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
31.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C)No.4615/2022

                                     2




                             JUDGMENT

Dated this the 31st day of May, 2022

The petitioner, who is holding 10 Ares and 55.22

Square metres of land comprised in Survey No.210/56 of

Chevayur Village in Kozhikode Taluk, is before this Court

seeking to direct the 2nd respondent to consider and pass

orders on Ext.P3 application, within a time frame fixed by

this Court.

2. The petitioner holds 10 Ares and 52.22 Square

metres of land in Survey No.210/56 of Chevayur Village in

Kozhikode Taluk. The land is described as "Nilam' in

Revenue records. According to the petitioner, the land is

not included in the Data Bank as Paddy Land. WP(C)No.4615/2022

Continuance of the description of land as 'Nilam' in the

Basic Tax Register causes hardship to the petitioner.

3. The petitioner, therefore, filed Ext.P3 application

in Form 6, invoking Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation

of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008. The application

was submitted as early on 06.12.2021. The delay in

passing orders on Ext.P3 application is causing untold

hardship and loss to the petitioner, contends the learned

counsel for the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Pleader entered

appearance and resisted the writ petition. The learned

Government Pleader pointed out that out of 10 Ares and

52.22 Square metres of land, the petitioner has submitted

application only for making necessary changes in respect

of 8.17 Ares. The learned counsel for the petitioner would

submit that the claim has been limited to 8.76 Ares since

the petitioner cannot afford to pay exorbitant fee. WP(C)No.4615/2022

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

the learned Government Pleader representing the

respondents.

6. The petitioner undoubtedly is holding 10 Ares

and 52.22 Square metres of land in Chevayur Village. The

land is not included in the Land Data Bank. However, it is

described as Paddy Land in Basic Tax Register. In order to

effect necessary changes in the Basic Tax Register, the

petitioner has filed Ext.P3 application invoking Rule 12(1)

of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland

Rules, 2008. Ext.P3 being a statutory application, the 2 nd

respondent, who is the competent authority under the Act,

2008, is duty bound to consider the application, within a

reasonable time and pass orders thereon.

In the circumstances, the writ petition is

disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P3

application, if it is received supported by all relevant WP(C)No.4615/2022

documents and paying the prescribed fee, if any, and take

a decision thereon, within a period of three months.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH JUDGE SR WP(C)No.4615/2022

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 4615/2022

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

Exhibit P1 THE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 10.03.2021.

Exhibit P2 THE COPY OF THE EXTRACT OF THE DRAFT DATA BANK.

Exhibit P3 THE COPY OF THE APPLICATION UNDER FORM 6 ALONG WITH SURVEY SKETCH BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 06.12.2021.

Exhibit P4 THE COPY OF THE CHALLAN EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF STATUTORY FEE DATED 12.04.2021.

Exhibit P5 THE COPY OF THE PROOF EVIDENCING THE RECEIPT.

SR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter