Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5827 Ker
Judgement Date : 31 May, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2022 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 25691 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
K.J. SCARIA
AGED 63 YEARS, S/O. K.J.KURIAN,
RESIDING AT PRASANTH BHAVAN, MARUTHORVATTOM P.O.,
CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688539.
BY ADVS.
B.PRAMOD
NAMITHA JYOTHISH
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER (CHIEF MANAGER)
SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED, REGIONAL OFFICE,
2ND FLOOR TMJ COMPLEX, RAMANCHIRA, THIRUVALLA-689107.
2 SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD.
CHERTHALA BRANCH, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA-688524,
REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.
3 THE GENERAL MANAGER (TECH), REGIONAL OFFICER,
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
REGIONAL OFFICE, KERALA, PALKULANGARA JN.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695008.
4 THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR & COMPETENT AUTHORITY,
LAND ACQUISITION (NATIONAL HIGHWAYS), NH 66, CHERTHALA,
ALAPPUZHA-688539.
5 ADDL. JOSEPH XAVIER
AGED 62 YEARS
(SOUGHT TO BE IMPLEADED)
BY ADVS.
SUNIL SHANKER
MATHEWS K.PHILIP
SABU P.JOSEPH
VIDYA GANGADHARAN
C.N.SREEKUMAR
W.P.(C) No.25691 of 2021 2
MANJU PAUL
ANIL PRASAD
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 31.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.25691 of 2021 3
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court challenging
Ext.P14 communication issued by the 1 st respondent to a
company known as Sofine Decors Pvt.Ltd. (of which the
petitioner is the Managing Director) rejecting a request for
adjustment of compensation payable by the National Highway
Authority of India for acquisition of properties belonging to the
company, directly to the 1st respondent bank for settlement of
liabilities with the bank.
2. When this matter came up for consideration before
this Court, taking into consideration the submission made by
the parties who were represented in Court, it directed that if
the title deeds of the properties which are now mortgaged to
the bank are produced before the NHAI authorities, they shall
consider the same and after arriving at the amount of
compensation payable, the said amount shall be paid to
respondents 1 and 2 considering the peculiar facts and
circumstances of the case. The determination of the
compensation payable was to be expedited.
3. When this matter is taken up for consideration
today, an impleading application has been filed by one Joseph
Xavier, as I.A No.2/2022, pointing out that the amount
receivable in terms of Ext.P12 in respect of property belonging
to a partnership firm of which the petitioner is the managing
partner cannot be applied for the discharge of liabilities of the
company named Sofine Decors Pvt.Ltd. The aforesaid Joseph
Xavier claimes to be a partner of the partnership firm in
respect of which Ext.P12 is issued. This is seriously disputed
by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner who states
that the petitioner sought to be impleaded is not actually a
partner and he had retired in 1994. However, this aspect need
not be considered or adjudicated here, as it is pointed out that
the amount receivable in respect of the property belonging to
the company will itself be sufficient to discharge the liability of
the bank.
5. The learned standing counsel appearing of the bank
submits that the exact amount due to the bank may be more
than the amount payable in respect of the property of the
company, on account of accrual of interest. This is entirely an
issue to be worked out between the Bank and the company in
question.
6. This Writ Petition will stand disposed of directing the
4th respondent to finalise proceedings in respect of Ext.P11
and to determine the amount of compensation payable to the
company (Sofine Decors Pvt.Ltd.). The said amount shall be
paid to respondents 1 and 2 without any further delay.
7. The proceedings in respect of Ext.P11 shall be
finalized as above, within a period of 1 month from the date of
receipt of a copy of this judgment. The recovery proceedings
shall deferred by a period of 1 month to enable the competent
authority determine the compensation payable, as above.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE
ats
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25691/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.314/06 DATED 8.2.2006.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 13.9.2018.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 31.5.2021.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 15.6.2021.
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 24.6.2021 SENT BY THE DIRECTORS BY NAME JOSEPH XAVIER.
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 24.6.2021 SENT BY THE DIRECTORS BY NAME VARKEY JOHN.
Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 24.6.2021 SENT BY THE DIRECTORS BY NAME AJITH MATHEW.
Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 26.7.2021 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.2296/09 DATED 24.10.2009.
Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 25.5.2020.
Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 24.6.2021 TO THE PETITIONER IN THE CAPACITY AS THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANY.
Exhibit P12 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 24.6.2021 TO THE PETITIONER IN THE CAPACITY AS THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANY.
Exhibit P13 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 28.9.2021.
Exhibit P14 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 5.10.2021.
RESPONDENT EXHIBITS
Exhibit R5(A) TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 'A' ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF FIRMS DATED 20-11-2020 OF THE M/S. FLORAL DECORATIVE AND NATURALS.
Exhibit R5(B) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 16-09-2021 IN C.P.NO.54/KOB/2020 FOR CONVENING THE AGM.
Exhibit R5(C) TRUE COPY OF THE DETAILED VALUATION STATEMENT OF M/S. FLORAL DECORATIVES AND NATURALS.
Exhibit R5(D) TRUE COPY OF THE DETAILED VALUATION STATEMENT OF M/S. SOFINE DECORS PVT. LTD.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!