Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5754 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 May, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 13353 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
A.P.VARGHESE,
AGED 73 YEARS
AREECKAL, (KALPPURAYIL), THIRUVILAMKUNNU, KARIYAD,
MEKKAD P.O., ERNAKULAM-683 589.
BY ADV SANIL KUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE MINISTER FOR REVENUE AND HOUSING,
OFFICE OF MINISTER FOR REVENUE AND HOUSING
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2 SPECIAL TAHASILDAR (LA),
NO.11, COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIR PORT LTD.,
NEDUMBASSERY, NEDUMBASSERY AIRPORT P.O.,
KERALA-683 111.
3 MANAGING DIRECTOR,
COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD., NEDUMBASSERY,
NEDUMBASSERY AIRPORT P.O., KERALA-683 111.
OTHER PRESENT:
SHRI.JAFFAR KHAN, SR.GP
SHRI.BENNY P.THOMAS - SC - CIAL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
27.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 13353 OF 2022 2
JUDGMENT
After the learned counsel for the parties argued this
matter today, noticing that the jurisdiction of this Court in such
matters are extremely limited, Shri.Sanil Kumar K. - learned
counsel for the petitioner, pleaded that his client's
representation, namely Ext.P3, preferred before the Hon'ble
Minister for Revenue and Housing, Government of Kerala be
directed to be taken up and disposed of by the said Authority
within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2. Shri.Jaffar Khan - learned Senior Government Pleader,
submitted that Ext.P3 is incompetent because it has been
preferred before the Hon'ble Minister, while the petitioner
ought to have approached the Secretary for Revenue.
3. Shri.Benny P.Thomas - learned Standing Counsel
appearing for the Cochin International Airport Ltd. (CIAL),
submitted that he does not have any comment to make on the
allegations made by the petitioner, except to say that they are
all without basis and that the property involved in this case -
which was earlier owned by him - has been put to use for the
purposes of the Airport. He added that, however, if this Court is
inclined to direct any of the competent respondents to take up
Ext.P3 or any other representation to be preferred by the
petitioner, the official concerned of the CIAL be also directed to
be heard.
Taking note of the afore submissions and since I find
favour with the afore contention of the learned Senior
Government Pleader, I order this writ petition, leaving liberty to
the petitioner to move the Secretary for Revenue, Government
of Kerala, with an appropriate representation/application; and if
this is done within a period of one month from the date of
receipt of a copy of this judgment, same shall be considered by
the said Authority, after affording the petitioner as also the
official concerned of the CIAL, an opportunity of being heard;
thus culminating in an appropriate order and necessary action
thereon, as expeditiously as is possible, but not later than four
months from the date on which it is so received.
I make it clear that this Court has not entered into the
merits of any of the rival contentions and that they are all left
open to be pursued appropriately when the afore exercise is
completed.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE MC/28.5
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13353/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE B2/17/95 ISSUED TO PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 04.07.95 SL. NO.16.
Exhibit P1 B TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE B2/17/95 ISSUED TO PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 04.07.95 SL. NO.17.
Exhibit P1 C TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE B2/17/95 ISSUED TO PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 04.07.95 SL. NO.19.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE LAC 12/95 ISSUED TO PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 15.01.96.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 15.08.2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!