Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5750 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 May, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNARUTAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MURAMED MUSTAGUR & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPSY THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 27°78 pAY OF MAY 2082 / OTH JYAISETA, 1944 MAT APPEAL NO, 293 OF 2694 AGAINST THE ORDER/ TUDGMENT IN OF 2056/2018 OF FAMTLY COURT , PRIVANDRUM APPELLANT (Ss SHRI .VINODRUMAR C, AGED 50 YEARS, SON OF CHANDRASERHARAN NAIR, RESIDING AT THERKEMADATHIL VEEDU, RRISHNANUJALI, KRISHNAN KOVIL JUNCTION, NEYYATTINKARA, NOW RESIDING AT RAILWAY QUARTERS, NELLOOR, PADURUPADY RAILWAY STATTIan, ANDERA PRADESS . BY ADYS. © BILE SMT ANUSHRA VIJATARUMAR RESPONDENT (5: SMY.LATEARUMART §., AGED 47 YEARS, D/O. OF SARASWATHY AMMA, SARASWATEY BHAVAN, CHITTATTINMUERY | FADIRVATTOMURED P.O, RKANYAPURAM, TRIRUVANANTRAPURAM, FIN - 85201 | BY ADY SHAJIN § .SAMEED THIS MATRINONIAL APPEAL RAVING BEEN FINALY BEARD ON 27.08.2022, ALONG WITH Mat. Appeal.382/2021, USE COURT of HE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mat Appeal No.293 &362/2021 ei IN TRE HIGH COURT OF KESALA AT SENAREUTAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUBAMED MUSTagtE & THE HONCURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPBY THOMAS PRIDAY, THE o7°"8 pay oF MAY 2022 / OPE JEAISHTA, 1844 MAT APPEAL NO. 362 OF 902% AGAINST THE ORDER/ JUDGMENT IN OP 9234/2614 OF PAaMYZy COURT . PRIVANDRIM APPELLANT /S: VINODRUMAR C., AGED 80 YEARS, 8/0, ORANDRASERBARAN NAIR, RESIDING AT THERREMADATHIL VEEDU, ERISHNANTALS, KRISHNAN MOVIL JUNCTION, NEYYATTINEARS, NOW RESIDING AT RATLWAY QUARTERS, NELLOOR, PADURUBADU RAILWAY STATION, ANDORRA FRADESE . BY ADYS, © .DIRIs MW. RARTRUMAR R. PRADEES ANUSERA VIJAYARUMAR RESPONDENT £8 < LATHARUMARI 8., AGED 47 YEARS, D/O, SARASWATHY AMMA, SARASWATHY BHAVAN, CHITTATIINMUERU, BADINJATTUMUREU P.O. , RANAYAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHABURAM, PIN - 695301. BY ADY SEASIN § . BAMEED SSIS MNATRIMONIAL APPEAL BRAVING BEEN FINALLY BEARD on 27.05.2022, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.293/2031, TRE coURT oy THE SAME DAY DELIVERED TRE POLGowres: SEE Mat. Appeal No.293 &362/208 | 3 JUDGMENT
[Mat .Agpeal Nos. 2953/2021, 3632/2021)
A.Muhsmed Mustague, 7.
The parties were referred for mediation. In the mediation, they settled all their disputes and decided ta live together. Recording the settlement, we dispose of these appeals. The settlement agreement will form
part of the judgment.
8adf-
A .MUBRAMED MUSTAOUE JUOGE
Sdf~ SORRY THOMAS TUBS"
in
MEMORANDONM OF AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 89 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE READ WITH RULES 24 & 25 OF THE MEDIATION RULES 2005 CIVIL PROCEDURE (ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION) RULES 2008
é wh A gs & - . or 6 in tha Court of rehaw gare bla ict beh Card Thituvanenthapuram OCH | s ?
OSIASICMAIMCICMP? Ne. PAT Ne. 293/202! :
i se ' tgs & 3 Misintifis/Appatiants/Patitioners : \iimecl Keri. € Defendants/Reapondents/ Counter Petitioners: x pe Laghn Kerrey '
The parties above namad bag fa submit as follows :
4. The aforesaid SuivApnpeal/Petitien/Gomplaint were referred to mediation for solving the dispute between the parties. in the course of mediation they have resolved their dispute and have agreed fo the following terns and conditions.
x g
. wy
(i artes © tahiaa iy ae ced he wwesidc. betcd Gana!
avd wtf x a \e ony . | s = 3 gos . . ' '
(8) "y ay bres wave O arced te rdharae 8 oR Fes rokatever 3 BR _ . ee} 8 x by me ah " 3 ' * . 3 i hal 8 ee ak we aR Claas, MES. ig fi Dads ¢ beak iy blak.
~ . ' oé my 4 i eb. 4 o REY fe wy dies & bere. B. dob Ss. ter 4 ae Fak Pot wy oe ast, Eh wre Ve amavdie' «Piss {ah é ,
-- x XR _ ; & ; men oe aces v Fla - Ay i ay an Thad ley aur eS et te wel te rh ES NY QiArg HERR s i. ; . ec . ; if & x . 4 3 5 ' i et 2 idl ya Og (oi oP ral ay Ginavcia) AMin St each ofl is
(¥) j 8 wat alae FRAG FOR of
Mae & A ' ES 4
owe x LRA LA
iv}
Be in view of the aforesaid agreement entered in to between parties, the parties pray that the guit/Appeal/petition/Complaint be disposed of in terre of the aforesaid agreement.
3. in view of the aforesaid agreement, plaintifiappellant/petitioner prays for refund of full Institution fee. ,
4. Parties will [email protected] OM crane pxoeneneaene before the Court for passing Orders/Decree in terms of the. above agreement
\ 4 you py oo . inne oy otainttfPetitio beComplainantiAppeltant Defendants/CP's/Respandent
ny
get 8 foe, a PA Set. tanta AAS. a ApH Yee Rs Absok! in car. é & "A x
s
. = ?
OIG 24 3
os Ke dafeke:
Advocate for FP} igingh/Petitioner/CamplainantiAppellant «dard Pe
iy S
y i fads
i. i P3805
€
vonage y
tesdy ong ee fey yak. " Fae 3 g ge ei a ey Re
Advocate for Defendants cP's/Respondent
We the parties above named, do hereby solemniy state and declare that what is contained In paragraph 7 to i Sooann Fe true to the best of our knowledge, information and bellef. . : . -
Place: "PT KUNA mee hap hase ,
Ne
o
Dated: IS So 28
' x OF \ \ Vs WN 0
a?
ais
a
~
%, fon
we
piainti#t/PetitioverIComplainanvAppeliant : Gefencdanis/GP's/Respondent
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!