Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri. Vinodkumar C vs Smt. Lathakumari. S
2022 Latest Caselaw 5750 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5750 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 May, 2022

Kerala High Court
Shri. Vinodkumar C vs Smt. Lathakumari. S on 27 May, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNARUTAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MURAMED MUSTAGUR
&

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPSY THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 27°78 pAY OF MAY 2082 / OTH JYAISETA, 1944
MAT APPEAL NO, 293 OF 2694
AGAINST THE ORDER/ TUDGMENT IN OF 2056/2018 OF FAMTLY
COURT , PRIVANDRUM

APPELLANT (Ss
SHRI .VINODRUMAR C, AGED 50 YEARS,
SON OF CHANDRASERHARAN NAIR,
RESIDING AT THERKEMADATHIL VEEDU,
RRISHNANUJALI, KRISHNAN KOVIL JUNCTION,
NEYYATTINKARA, NOW RESIDING AT RAILWAY QUARTERS,

NELLOOR, PADURUPADY RAILWAY STATTIan,
ANDERA PRADESS .

BY ADYS.
© BILE
SMT ANUSHRA VIJATARUMAR

RESPONDENT (5:

SMY.LATEARUMART §., AGED 47 YEARS,
D/O. OF SARASWATHY AMMA,

SARASWATEY BHAVAN, CHITTATTINMUERY |
FADIRVATTOMURED P.O, RKANYAPURAM,
TRIRUVANANTRAPURAM, FIN - 85201 |

BY ADY SHAJIN § .SAMEED

THIS MATRINONIAL APPEAL RAVING BEEN FINALY BEARD ON 27.08.2022,
ALONG WITH Mat. Appeal.382/2021, USE COURT of HE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

 
 

Mat Appeal No.293 &362/2021 ei

IN TRE HIGH COURT OF KESALA AT SENAREUTAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUBAMED MUSTagtE
&

THE HONCURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPBY THOMAS
PRIDAY, THE o7°"8 pay oF MAY 2022 / OPE JEAISHTA, 1844
MAT APPEAL NO. 362 OF 902%

AGAINST THE ORDER/ JUDGMENT IN OP 9234/2614 OF PAaMYZy
COURT . PRIVANDRIM

APPELLANT /S:
VINODRUMAR C., AGED 80 YEARS,
8/0, ORANDRASERBARAN NAIR, RESIDING AT
THERREMADATHIL VEEDU, ERISHNANTALS,
KRISHNAN MOVIL JUNCTION, NEYYATTINEARS,
NOW RESIDING AT RATLWAY QUARTERS,

NELLOOR, PADURUBADU RAILWAY STATION,
ANDORRA FRADESE .

 

BY ADYS,

© .DIRIs

MW. RARTRUMAR

R. PRADEES

ANUSERA VIJAYARUMAR

RESPONDENT £8 <
LATHARUMARI 8., AGED 47 YEARS,
D/O, SARASWATHY AMMA, SARASWATHY BHAVAN,
CHITTATIINMUERU, BADINJATTUMUREU P.O. ,
RANAYAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHABURAM, PIN - 695301.

BY ADY SEASIN § . BAMEED

SSIS MNATRIMONIAL APPEAL BRAVING BEEN FINALLY BEARD on
27.05.2022, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.293/2031, TRE coURT oy
THE SAME DAY DELIVERED TRE POLGowres:
 

SEE

Mat. Appeal No.293 &362/208 | 3

JUDGMENT

[Mat .Agpeal Nos. 2953/2021, 3632/2021)

A.Muhsmed Mustague, 7.

The parties were referred for mediation. In the mediation, they settled all their disputes and decided ta live together. Recording the settlement, we dispose of these appeals. The settlement agreement will form

part of the judgment.

8adf-

A .MUBRAMED MUSTAOUE JUOGE

Sdf~ SORRY THOMAS TUBS"

in

MEMORANDONM OF AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 89 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE READ WITH RULES 24 & 25 OF THE MEDIATION RULES 2005 CIVIL PROCEDURE (ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION) RULES 2008

é wh A gs & - . or 6 in tha Court of rehaw gare bla ict beh Card Thituvanenthapuram OCH | s ?

OSIASICMAIMCICMP? Ne. PAT Ne. 293/202! :

i se ' tgs & 3 Misintifis/Appatiants/Patitioners : \iimecl Keri. € Defendants/Reapondents/ Counter Petitioners: x pe Laghn Kerrey '

The parties above namad bag fa submit as follows :

4. The aforesaid SuivApnpeal/Petitien/Gomplaint were referred to mediation for solving the dispute between the parties. in the course of mediation they have resolved their dispute and have agreed fo the following terns and conditions.

x g

. wy

(i artes © tahiaa iy ae ced he wwesidc. betcd Gana!

avd wtf x a \e ony . | s = 3 gos . . ' '

(8) "y ay bres wave O arced te rdharae 8 oR Fes rokatever 3 BR _ . ee} 8 x by me ah " 3 ' * . 3 i hal 8 ee ak we aR Claas, MES. ig fi Dads ¢ beak iy blak.

~ . ' oé my 4 i eb. 4 o REY fe wy dies & bere. B. dob Ss. ter 4 ae Fak Pot wy oe ast, Eh wre Ve amavdie' «Piss {ah é ,

-- x XR _ ; & ; men oe aces v Fla - Ay i ay an Thad ley aur eS et te wel te rh ES NY QiArg HERR s i. ; . ec . ; if & x . 4 3 5 ' i et 2 idl ya Og (oi oP ral ay Ginavcia) AMin St each ofl is

(¥) j 8 wat alae FRAG FOR of

Mae & A ' ES 4

owe x LRA LA

iv}

Be in view of the aforesaid agreement entered in to between parties, the parties pray that the guit/Appeal/petition/Complaint be disposed of in terre of the aforesaid agreement.

3. in view of the aforesaid agreement, plaintifiappellant/petitioner prays for refund of full Institution fee. ,

4. Parties will [email protected] OM crane pxoeneneaene before the Court for passing Orders/Decree in terms of the. above agreement

\ 4 you py oo . inne oy otainttfPetitio beComplainantiAppeltant Defendants/CP's/Respandent

ny

get 8 foe, a PA Set. tanta AAS. a ApH Yee Rs Absok! in car. é & "A x

s

. = ?

OIG 24 3

os Ke dafeke:

Advocate for FP} igingh/Petitioner/CamplainantiAppellant «dard Pe

iy S

y i fads

i. i P3805

vonage y

tesdy ong ee fey yak. " Fae 3 g ge ei a ey Re

Advocate for Defendants cP's/Respondent

We the parties above named, do hereby solemniy state and declare that what is contained In paragraph 7 to i Sooann Fe true to the best of our knowledge, information and bellef. . : . -

Place: "PT KUNA mee hap hase ,

Ne

o

Dated: IS So 28

' x OF \ \ Vs WN 0

a?

ais

a

~

%, fon

we

piainti#t/PetitioverIComplainanvAppeliant : Gefencdanis/GP's/Respondent

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter