Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5725 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 May, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 13918 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
RAJAGOPALAN,
AGED 55 YEARS
S/O. VILLWADRI EZHUTHACHAN, CHEMBRAYATH,
PARUTHIPULLI, PERINGOTTUKURISSI-I, VILLAGE, ALATHUR,
PALAKKAD 678 004.
BY ADV SHRI.JOHNSON VARIKKAPPALLIL
RESPONDENT:
SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.R),
OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R.),
MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, PATTAMBI,
PALAKKAD, 679 104.
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT MABLE C KURIAN SR GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 27.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 13918 OF 2022 2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court asserting that a
suo motu proceedings, bearing S.M.No.540 of 2022, has been
initiated against him by the respondent - Special Tahsildar
(LR); and seeks that the same be directed to be disposed of
within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2. In response, the learned Senior Government Pleader,
Smt.Mable C.Kurian, submitted that the afore mentioned suo
motu proceedings was initiated against the petitioner only in
April, 2022 and therefore, that this writ petition is premature.
3. When I hear the learned Senior Government Pleader as
afore, it is without doubt that this Court has been ordering suo
motu proceedings to be disposed of within a time frame. That
said, though this Court normally fixes eighteen months time for
the Competent Authority to complete proceedings, I am of the
view that in this case it will be justified to expand it to twenty
four months, since the application of the petitioner has been
made only very recently.
Resultantly, this writ petition is ordered, directing the
respondent to complete proceedings in S.M.No.540 of 2022,
after following due procedure and after affording necessary
opportunity of being heard to the petitioner - as also any other
interested person - as expeditiously as is possible, but not later
than twenty four months from the date of receipt of a certified
copy of this judgment.
Though there is no specific averment regarding the
involvement of any Devaswom Board in the S.M.Proceedings, it
is made clear that if the competent Authority is to find so, then
the said entity will also be given an opportunity of being heard
while the afore directed exercise is completed.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE MC/28.5
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13918/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT IN S.M.NO.
540/2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 05.04.2022.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!