Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajagopalan vs Special Tahsildar(L.R)
2022 Latest Caselaw 5725 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5725 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 May, 2022

Kerala High Court
Rajagopalan vs Special Tahsildar(L.R) on 27 May, 2022
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
      FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1944
                      WP(C) NO. 13918 OF 2022
PETITIONER:

             RAJAGOPALAN,
             AGED 55 YEARS
             S/O. VILLWADRI EZHUTHACHAN, CHEMBRAYATH,
             PARUTHIPULLI, PERINGOTTUKURISSI-I, VILLAGE, ALATHUR,
             PALAKKAD 678 004.
             BY ADV SHRI.JOHNSON VARIKKAPPALLIL


RESPONDENT:

             SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(L.R),
             OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R.),
             MINI CIVIL STATION, OTTAPALAM, PATTAMBI,
             PALAKKAD, 679 104.
OTHER PRESENT:

             SMT MABLE C KURIAN SR GP


      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   27.05.2022,   THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 13918 OF 2022          2

                           JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court asserting that a

suo motu proceedings, bearing S.M.No.540 of 2022, has been

initiated against him by the respondent - Special Tahsildar

(LR); and seeks that the same be directed to be disposed of

within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. In response, the learned Senior Government Pleader,

Smt.Mable C.Kurian, submitted that the afore mentioned suo

motu proceedings was initiated against the petitioner only in

April, 2022 and therefore, that this writ petition is premature.

3. When I hear the learned Senior Government Pleader as

afore, it is without doubt that this Court has been ordering suo

motu proceedings to be disposed of within a time frame. That

said, though this Court normally fixes eighteen months time for

the Competent Authority to complete proceedings, I am of the

view that in this case it will be justified to expand it to twenty

four months, since the application of the petitioner has been

made only very recently.

Resultantly, this writ petition is ordered, directing the

respondent to complete proceedings in S.M.No.540 of 2022,

after following due procedure and after affording necessary

opportunity of being heard to the petitioner - as also any other

interested person - as expeditiously as is possible, but not later

than twenty four months from the date of receipt of a certified

copy of this judgment.

Though there is no specific averment regarding the

involvement of any Devaswom Board in the S.M.Proceedings, it

is made clear that if the competent Authority is to find so, then

the said entity will also be given an opportunity of being heard

while the afore directed exercise is completed.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE MC/28.5

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13918/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT IN S.M.NO.

540/2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 05.04.2022.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter