Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5679 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 May, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 17157 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
BINU K.
AGED 33 YEARS
S/O. KUNJU, THEKKETHARA HOUSE, MANJAPRA, KANNAMBRA II VILLAGE,
ALATHUR, PALAKKAD- 678 685.
BY ADV V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)
RESPONDENT:
SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LR)
OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.R.), MINI CIVIL STATION,
OTTAPALAM, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD 679 104.
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT K AMMINIKUTTY - SR GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.05.2022,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 17157 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court asserting that a suo
motu proceedings, bearing S.M.No.659/2022, has been initiated
against him by the respondent - Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms);
and seeks that the same be directed to be disposed of within a time
frame to be fixed by this Court.
2. In response, the learned Senior Government Pleader,
Smt.K.Amminikutty, submitted that the afore mentioned suo motu
proceedings was initiated against the petitioner only recently and
therefore, that this writ petition is premature.
3. When I hear the learned Senior Government Pleader as
afore, it is without doubt that this Court has been ordering suo
motu proceedings to be disposed of within a time frame. That said,
though this Court normally fixes eighteen months time for the
Competent Authority to complete proceedings, I am of the view
that in this case it will be justified to expand it to twenty four
months, since the application of the petitioner has been made only
very recently.
Resultantly, this writ petition is ordered, directing the
respondent to complete proceedings in S.M.No.659/2022, after WP(C) NO. 17157 OF 2022
following due procedure and after affording necessary opportunity
of being heard to the petitioner - as also any other interested
person - as expeditiously as is possible, but not later than twenty
four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this
judgment.
Though there is no specific averment regarding the
involvement of any Devaswom Board in the S.M.Proceedings, it is
made clear that if the competent Authority is to find so, then the
said entity will also be given an opportunity of being heard while
the afore directed exercise is completed.
SD/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE rp WP(C) NO. 17157 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17157/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT IN S.M NO. 659/2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 04.05.2022.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!