Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5675 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 May, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 17146 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
DEVAKI,
AGED 66 YEARS
W/O. LATE V.S. RAMAN, VADAKKEVEEDU, ODANNUR, PARALI II VILLAGE,
PALAKKAD 678 612.
BY ADV V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)
RESPONDENT:
SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.T),
OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (L.T), PALAKKAD,
PALAKKAD 678 001.
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT MABLE C KURIAN - SR GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.05.2022,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 17146 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who is stated to be a senior citizen of over 66
years in age, has approached this Court alleging that, even though a
suo motu proceedings has been initiated against her by the
respondent Special Tahsildar (Land Reforms) and numbered as
S.M.No.418/2022, further action thereon has not been completed until
now. The petitioner, therefore, prays the respondent be directed to do
so and issue appropriate final orders thereon, within a time frame to
be fixed by this Court.
2. In response, the learned Senior Government Pleader
Smt.K.Amminikutty, submitted that, if the suo motu proceedings are
still pending against the petitioner, the same can be disposed of by
the respondent, within a period of eight months, taking note of the
fact that she is a senior citizen. She, therefore, prayed that this writ
petition be ordered only on such terms.
3. When I consider the afore submissions, it is ineluctable that if
S.M.No.418/2022, is still pending against the petitioner, then it will
require to be disposed of by the respondent within a period of eight
months, because this is the time frame that has been constantly
followed by this Court in the case of senior citizens.
Resultantly, this writ petition is ordered, directing the
respondent to complete proceedings in S.M.No.418/2022, after WP(C) NO. 17146 OF 2022
following due procedure and after affording necessary opportunity of
being heard to the petitioner - as also to any other interested/affected
persons - thus, culminating in an apposite order thereon, as
expeditiously as is possible, but not later than eight months from the
date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
Though there is no specific averment regarding the involvement
of any Devaswom Board in the S.M.Proceedings, it is made clear that
if the competent Authority is to find so, then the said entity will also
be given an opportunity of being heard while the afore directed
exercise is completed.
SD/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE rp WP(C) NO. 17146 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17146/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT IN S.M. NO. 418/2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 30.04.2022.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAAR CARD NO. 5636 0117 2262 OF THE PETITIONER.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!