Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr.J.Harikrishna Pillai vs State Of Kerala
2022 Latest Caselaw 5665 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5665 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 May, 2022

Kerala High Court
Dr.J.Harikrishna Pillai vs State Of Kerala on 27 May, 2022
WP(C) No.16004/2021                            1/4

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                            PRESENT
                        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
                      Friday, the 27th day of May 2022 / 6th Jyaishta, 1944
                                     WP(C) NO. 16004 OF 2021
   PETITIONER:

      1. DR.J.HARIKRISHNA PILLAI, AGED 57 YEARS S/O. K. JANARDHANAN PILLAI,
         'OCTOBER', NEAR S.N. JUNCTION, TRIPUNITHURA P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
      2. DR. R. SURESH, AGED 59 YEARS S/O. RAGHAVAN NAIR, INDEEVARAM HOUSE,
         HOUSE NO. 45/XX/13, AZHOOR ROAD, PATHANAMTHITTA P.O, PIN-689 645,
         (PRESENTLY RESIDING AT SAI KRUPA, ELANJIMEL P.O, CHENGANNUR,
         ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-689 511), (LECTURER, COMMUNITY MEDICINE,
         ATHURASRAMAM, N.S.S. HOMOEO MEDICAL COLLEGE, S. PURAM P.O, KURICHY,
         KOTTAYAM-686 532)

   RESPONDENT:

      1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE
         GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001
      2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, AYUSH DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT
         SECREATARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001
      3. THE PRINCIPAL AND CONTROLLING OFFICER, GOVERNMENT HOMEOPATHIC
         MEDICAL COLLEGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 009

        Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
   stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
   pleased to permit the petitioners to continue in service till the age of
   62 years as in the case of the doctors in the Medical Education Service,
   pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
        This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and
   the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and upon hearing the arguments of
   SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL Advocates for the petitioners and of GOVERNMENT
   PLEADER for the respondents, the court passed the following:
 WP(C) No.16004/2021                           2/4




                                RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, J.
                               -------------------------------------
                                W.P.(C) No.16004 of 2021
                              -------------------------------------------
                            Dated this the 27th day of May, 2022



                                             ORDER

I have heard Sri. Sajeev Kumar K. Gopal, the learned counsel appearing

for the petitioners and Smt. Surya Binoy, the learned Government Pleader.

2. Sri. Sajeev Kumar K. Gopal, the learned counsel submitted that

insofar as the Doctors working in the Medical Education Services are concerned,

the retirement age is fixed as 60 years as per Ext.P1 order. The retirement age

of teaching staff in Ayurveda Medical Education was also enhanced to 60 years

as per Ext.P2 order. Later, the retirement age of Doctors in the Medical

Education Service was enhanced to 62 years as per G.O(P) No.169/17/H&FW

Dept. dated 28.11.2017. Despite the enhancement granted as above, no

corresponding increase was made insofar as teachers in the Ayurvedic Medical

Education as well as Homeopathic Medical Colleges are concerned. The learned

counsel contends that the petitioners are also entitled to get their retirement

age at par with the Doctors of the Medical Education Service. The learned

counsel also relies on Ext.P4 judgment wherein the Apex Court had held that WP(C) No.16004/2021 3/4 W.P.(C) No.16004 of 2021

Ayush Doctors shall not be discriminated as against Allopathy Doctors and they

are also entitled to equal treatment in the matter of fixation of retirement age.

The learned counsel submits that teaching staff of Government Homeopathic

Medical Colleges have been allowed to continue by an order passed by the

Kerala Administrative Tribunal and there is no reason why the petitioners cannot

be granted similar relief and continue in service till the age of 62 years. The

learned counsel contends that the 2nd petitioner is to retire on 31.5.2022 and

seeks urgent orders.

Having considered the submissions advanced by Sri.Sajeev Kumar K.

Gopal, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the law laid down

by the Apex Court in Ext.P4, there will be a direction to the respondents to

permit the 2nd petitioner to continue in service for a period of one month,

notwithstanding the fact that he is slated to retire on 31.5.2022.

Post after three weeks.

Sd/-

                                                      RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V,
                                                                 JUDGE
       sru




27-05-2022                        /True Copy/                               Assistant Registrar
 WP(C) No.16004/2021                 4/4

                       APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16004/2021
Exhibit P1            TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

DATED 14.01.2010 VIDE G.O(MS) NO. 14/2010/H AND FWD. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER VIDE G.O(MS) NO.

108/2012/H & FWD DATED 09.04.2012.

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE SUPREMECOURT OF INDIA IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4578/2021 DATED 03.08.2021.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter