Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shemil Mohammed vs 1. Federal Bank
2022 Latest Caselaw 5488 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5488 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 May, 2022

Kerala High Court
Shemil Mohammed vs 1. Federal Bank on 20 May, 2022
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
   FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 30TH VAISAKHA, 1944
                       WP(C) NO. 7256 OF 2022
PETITIONERS:

    1        SHEMIL MOHAMMED, AGED 27 YEARS,
             S/O.MOHAMMED HANEEFA,
             KALLELIL, CHERAVALLY, KAYAMKULAM P.O.,
             ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690502
    2        SHEKHA MOHAMMED,AGED 24 YEARS,
             D/O.MOHAMMED HANEEFA,
             KALLELIL, CHERAVALLY, KAYAMKULAM P.O.,
             ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690502
             BY ADVS.
             ARUN CHAND
             VINAYAK G MENON
             BHARAT VIJAY P.
             MAJID MUHAMMED K.


RESPONDENTS:

    1        FEDERAL BANK
             MAVELIKARA BRANCH, MAVELIKARA, ALAPPUZHA ,
             REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER , PIN - 690101
    2        THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER
             FEDERAL BANK, MAVELIKARA BRANCH, MAVELIKARA,
             ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.,
             PIN - 690101
             BY ADVS.
             A.ANTONY
             LEELAMMA ANTONY



THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
20.05.2022,     THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) 7256/2021
                                         2



                      BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                    ..............................................
                        W.P.(C) No.7256 of 2022
                       .....................................
                  Dated this the 20 th day of May, 2022

                                 JUDGMENT

Sri.A.Antony, the learned counsel for the

respondents submit that the sale scheduled

pursuant to Ext.P2 did not take place due to the

absence of bidders.

2. The said submission is recorded.

3. In view of the above, nothing further survives to

be considered in this writ petition and the same is

dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

AMV/21/05//2022

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter