Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5466 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 May, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
Friday, the 20th day of May 2022 / 30th Vaisakha, 1944
IA.NO.1/2022 IN WP(C) NO. 14754 OF 2021 (T)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
M/S CANON GRANITES (P) LTD. HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT XXV/23,
MUNICIPAL BUILDING, ROUND SOUTH, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 001.
REPRESENTED BY IT'S MANAGING DIRECTOR JOSE K.FRANCIS, AGED 62,S/O
FRANCIS, KUTTIKKADAN HOUSE, ARISTO ROAD, EAST FORT.P.O, THRISSUR-680
001.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695
001.
2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF
TAXATION,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, OFFICE AT CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE,
THRISSUR-680 003.
Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to permit the
petitioner to remit the defaulted amounts of arrears of vehicle tax from
20/12/2021 by extending the time granted in the judgment dated 10/08/2021
of this Honourable court.
This Application coming on for orders upon perusing the application
and the affidavit filed in support thereof, and this court's judgment
dated 10/08/2021 and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.R.ARUN KRISHNAN,
DEEPA K.RADHAKRISHNAN & BIJU KUMAR, Advocates for the petitioner in
I.A/WP(C) and of GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondents (By Order) in
I.A/WP(C), the court passed the following:
Devan Ramachandran, J.
-------------------------------
I.A.No.1 of 2022
in
W.P(C).No.14754 of 2021
------------------------------------
Dated this the 20th day of May, 2022
O R D E R
This application seeking extension of time to
pay the amounts as per the earlier directions of this
Court is opposed by Smt.Resmitha Ramachandran, learned
Government Pleader. She pointed out that, as per the
judgment, the petitioner has to pay the amount in 12
equal monthly instalments, commencing from 20.09.2021;
but that they have only paid four out of the same. She
argued that the judgment is a self working one and
that, therefore, the respondents are now entitled to
take further action as per law.
2. In reply, Shri.K.R.Arun Krishnan, learned
counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the reason
for default of 6 instalments has been detailed in the
affidavit filed in support of this I.A. He prayed for
lenitude, adding that his client will pay the entire
balance amount, without waiting for the instalments to
complete, on or before 15.06.2022.
3. On hearing Shri.K.R.Arun Krishnan as afore, I
asked the learned Government Pleader whether a
limited latitude can be shown to the petitioner and
she left to this Court to take an apposite decision.
Resultantly, this I.A. is allowed to the
limited extent of directing the petitioner to pay off
the entire outstanding amount, with all applicable
charges and interest, on or before 15.06.2022;
failing which all consequential action as permitted
in the judgment can be taken forward by the
respondents.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE
MC
20-05-2022 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!