Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5416 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 May, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
Friday, the 20th day of May 2022 / 30th Vaisakha, 1944
WA NO. 134 OF 2021
AGAINST JUDGMENT DATED 01.07.2020 IN WP(C) 4550/2020 OF THIS COURT
---
APPELLANTS/PETITIOENRS:
1. KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION PENSIONERS ASSOCIATION,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SRI. CHANDRAKANTH, AGED 65 YEARS,
S/O.LATE T. K. NAIR, SITHARA, THYKOODAM, VYTTILA, ERNAKULAM
DISTRICT-682068.(RTD.SR.ASSISTANT MANAGER OF KERALA STATE
WAREHOUSING CORPORATION).
AND ANOTHER.
BY ADVS.M/S. ELVIN PETER P.J.,K.R.GANESH,KAIMAL PRIYA PADMANABHA,
SIDHARTH SUDHEER & GOURI BALAGOPAL
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1. KERALA STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION ,REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING
DIRECTOR, P. B. NO.1727, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KOCHI-682016.
AND 2 OTHERS.
BY ADV. SRI.MAJNU KOMATH FOR R1 & R2.
ADV.SRI. BENNY .P.THOMAS FOR R3.
Prayer for interim relief in the Writ Appeal stating that in the
circumstances stated in the appeal memorandum, the High Court be pleased
to set aside the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 01.07.2020 in
W.P.(C) No.4550/2020, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal.
This Writ Appeal again coming on for orders along with connected
cases on 20.05.2022 upon perusing the appeal memorandum and this court's
order dated 24.03.2021, the court on the same day passed the following:
P.T.O.
ALEXANDER THOMAS & SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JJ.
=================================
WA No. 134 of 2021
[arising out of the impugned judgment dated 01.07.2020 in WP(C) No.4550 of 2020]
WA No. 191 of 2021
[arising out of the impugned judgment dated 01.07.2020 in WP(C) No.4625 of 2020]
WA No. 1378 of 2020
[arising out of the impugned judgment dated 01.07.2020 in WP(C) No.4550 of 2020]
&
WA No. 1440 of 2020
[arising out of the impugned judgment dated 01.07.2020 in WP(C) No.4625 of 2020]
=================================
Dated this the 20th day of May, 2022
ORDER
This matter has been coming up for consideration for more than
one time. Sri.Majnu Komath, learned Standing Counsel for the Kerala
State Warehousing Corporation, seeks a short adjournment.
2. Sri.P.J.Elvin Peter, learned Advocate appearing for the
appellants in WA No.134 of 2021/retirees, submits that if the
adjournment sought for is short, he will not oppose, but, a longer
adjournment will be seriously opposed by him.
3. We queried to both sides as to whether the provisions of the
Employees Pension Scheme framed under the Employees' Provident
Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, are applicable to the case of
the employees of the Kerala State Warehousing Corporation, and if so, WA Nos. 134/2021 & con. cases
why the pension contribution @ 8.33% of the employees' contribution to
the EPF was not made to the corpus of the Central Pension Fund
constituted as per the abovesaid central legislation. We did not get clear
and definite answers from both sides and they sought time for getting
instructions.
4. However, Sri.P.J.Elvin Peter, learned Advocate appearing for
the retirees/appellants in WA No.134/2021, would point out that
presumably, it may be on account of the fact that the norms in the
Central Employees Pension Scheme, as per the Central EPF Act,
envisage that if equally efficacious or a better pension scheme is being
followed by the employer, then, they could be exempted from the rigor
of central norms and that it was assured to the employees at that time
that they would be covered under the pension scheme of the
Warehousing Corporation and that later, they are left in the lurch and
the employer Warehousing Corporation is taking the stand that they
have no right to get the benefit of the pension scheme of the
Warehousing Corporation and, in the result, that the appellants/retirees
are left in the lurch with no pension and most of them are in old age
including in the age range of eighties.
WA Nos. 134/2021 & con. cases
5. The Managing Director of the Kerala State Warehousing
Corporation as well as the Principal Secretary to Government in the
Administrative Department concerned will immediately furnish clear
and precise instructions as to whether the employees of the
Warehousing Corporation are otherwise eligible to be subscribed to the
Central Employees Pension Scheme as per the above said Central Act
and if so, why the said contributions to the corpus of the Pension Fund
under the said Central Employees Pension Scheme were not made and
as to why the Warehousing Corporation and the State Government can
justify the denial of pension benefits to these retired employees in terms
of the Corporation's scheme.
6. We also made certain other suggestions to both sides and
they assured us that they want some time to get instructions from the
respective parties and that they would advise the parties to take a very
proactive stand to the said suggestions made by this Court.
7. Time by ten days is granted to the Managing Director of the
Kerala State Warehousing Corporation and the Principal Secretary to
Government in the Department concerned to furnish instructions on the
above said aspects. The Managing Director of the Warehousing WA Nos. 134/2021 & con. cases
Corporation will forward a copy of this order to the Principal Secretary
to Government of Kerala in the Department concerned.
List the case on 31.05.2022.
Hand Over
Sd/-
ALEXANDER THOMAS JUDGE
Sd/-
SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGE bka/-
20-05-2022 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!