Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shibu T.T vs The State Of Kerala
2022 Latest Caselaw 5354 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5354 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 May, 2022

Kerala High Court
Shibu T.T vs The State Of Kerala on 20 May, 2022
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                   PRESENT
                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
                                      &
                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
            Friday, the 20th day of May 2022 / 30th Vaisakha, 1944
                CRL.M.APPL.NO.1/2019 IN CRL.A NO. 1302 OF 2019

            CRIME NO.518/2014 OF Karimannoor Police Station, Idukki

      S.C NO.248/2015 OF THE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT-I,THODUPUZHA.

                        (SPECIAL COURT UNDER POCSO ACT)

PETITIONER/APPELLANT

     SHIBU T.T., AGED 33 YEARS, S/O.THANKACHAN, THOMBALADIYIL HOUSE,
     THANNITHODU KARA, THANNITHODU BHAGOM, THANNITHODU VILLAGE,
     PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

  1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
     KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.
  2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALIYAR POLICE STATION, KALIYAR, IDUKKI
     DISTRICT-685 582.


     Application praying that in the circumstances stated therein the
High Court be pleased to suspend the sentence imposed as per Judgment
dated 31/10/2019 in S.C.No.248/2015 on the files of the Special court
under POCSO Act, Thodupuzha in Crime No.518/2014 of Karimannoor Police
Station, pending disposal of the above Criminal Appeal.




     This Application coming on for orders upon perusing the application
and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.SRI.E.C.POULOSE, SMT.BOBBY
RAPHEAL.C, Advocates for the petitioner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the
respondents, the court passed the following:




    p.t.o
        K.VINOD CHANDRAN & C.JAYACHANDRAN, JJ.
        ------------------------------------
                 Crl.M.A No.1 of 2019
                           in
              Crl.Appeal No.1302 of 2019
        -------------------------------------
         Dated this the 20th day of May, 2022

                                 O R D E R

Jayachandran, J.

1. The petitioner/appellant is the sole accused

in S.C No.248/2015 of the Additional Sessions

Court-I (Special Court under POCSO Act),

Thodupuzha. He stood convicted for offences under

Sections 376(2)(i) and (n) of the Penal Code, as

also, under Sections 5(l) and (m), read with 7 of

the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences

(POCSO) Act and is sentenced to undergo

imprisonment for life and fine.

2. In the instant Criminal Miscellaneous

Application, the petitioner seeks temporary

suspension of the order of sentence and his

release on interim bail, on the premise that

Smt.Leela Madhavan, the sister of petitioner's

father, is critically ill, wherefore, the

petitioner wants to see her before her death.

Annexure-2 medical certificate is produced to

support the medical condition of the said Leela

Madhavan. The petitioner would aver that he was Crl.MA 1/19 in Crl.Appeal 1302/2019

abandoned by his biological mother in his tender

age and was looked after by the said Leela

Madhavan as her own son.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

and Smt.S.Ambika Devi, learned Special Government

Pleader for Atrocities against Woman and Child.

Perused the records.

4. This application is seriously opposed by the

learned Special Government Pleader, by pointing

out that a 10 year old girl was raped by the petitioner continuously for a period of 1 ½ years.

5. Having heard the learned counsel appearing on

both sides, we are not inclined to allow this

Criminal Miscellaneous Application. Primarily, we

note that the one, who is stated to be critically

ill, is not the petitioner's mother, but his aunt.

We also note the gravity of the offence alleged,

as pointed out by Smt.S.Abmika Devi, learned

Special Government Pleader. The allegation is that Crl.MA 1/19 in Crl.Appeal 1302/2019

the petitioner committed rape on a minor girl,

aged 10 years, for a period of more than one year.

Aggravated penetrative sexual assault is alleged

during the above period, going by the prosecution

allegation. The petitioner was found guilty of the

offences alleged and he is undergoing life term.

In the backdrop of the above facts, we are not

convinced of the sufficiency of the reasons stated

by the petitioner in seeking interim bail.

6. In the circumstances, this Criminal M.A would

stand dismissed.

Sd/-

K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE

Sd/-

C.JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE jg

20-05-2022 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter