Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5280 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 May, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 27TH VAISAKHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 15893 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
DIVYA DILEEP,AGED 32 YEARS,D/O.P.S.DILIP KUMAR,
NOW WORKING AS CLERK, COMMISSIONERATE OF CIVIL SUPPLIES
AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, RESIDING AT
PALAZHI HOUSE, MANKODE VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK,
KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691506
BY ADVS.
M.G.SREEJITH
LUKE J CHIRAYIL
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE, THE KERALA
STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED
P.B.NO.2030, MAVELI BHAVAN, MAVELI ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR,
KOCHI, PIN - 682020
2 THE ADDITIONAL GENERAL MANAGER (P AND A)
THE KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED,
P.B.NO.2030, MAVELI BHAVAN, MAVELI ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR,
KOCHI, PIN - 682020
3 THE REGIONAL MANAGER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REGION
THE KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED,
GX36, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN -
695014
4 THE DEPOT MANGER, THE KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES
CORPORATION LIMITED KOTTARAKKARA
KOTTARAKKARA - EDAKKIDOM - NEDUMANKAVU RD,
KOTTARAKKARA, KERALA, PIN - 691506
5 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS , THE KERALA STATE CIVIL
SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED
P.B.NO.2030, MAVELI BHAVAN, MAVELI ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR,
KOCHI,REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, PIN - 682020
BY ADV R.LAKSHMI NARAYAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
17.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.15893/2022 2
JUDGMENT
The grievance of the petitioner is that as
against Exhibit P7 order passed against the
petitioner as part of disciplinary proceedings,
she was directed to pay an amount of
Rs.35846.97/- within a period of 30 days from
the date of the order. It is pointed out that
as against Ext.P7 order, an appeal has been
preferred by her before the 5th respondent as
evidenced by Ext.P8. Along with the said
appeal, a stay petition was also filed and the
same are yet to be numbered. According to the
learned counsel for the petitioner, the
recovery is going to be effected from her
salary in the meantime. This Writ Petition is
filed in such circumstances.
2. Heard both sides.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances
of this case, the 5th respondent is directed to
take up and pass orders on the stay petition
filed along with Ext.P8 and pass appropriate
orders thereon as expeditiously as possible.
Till such a decision is taken by the 5th
respondent on stay petition, the recovery
proceedings against the petitioner, if any,
shall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/-
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
JUDGE
pkk
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15893/2022
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF MEMO OF CHARGES DATED 28-05-
2020 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Exhibit2 TRUE COPY OF EXPLANATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 16-06-2020 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 25-06-2020 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Exhibit-P4 TRUE COPY OF REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 20-10-2020
Exhibit5 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 04-03-2022 IN WP(C) NO.7134/2022
Exhibit-P6 TRUE COPY OF REQUEST DATED 17-03-2022 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Exhibit-P7 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 24-03-2022 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit-P8 TRUE COPY OF APPEAL AND STAY PETITION DATED 07-05-2022 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!