Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Deepak Narendran vs The Asst. Commissioner
2022 Latest Caselaw 5222 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5222 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 May, 2022

Kerala High Court
Deepak Narendran vs The Asst. Commissioner on 13 May, 2022
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
                                     &
                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
           Friday, the 13th day of May 2022 / 23rd Vaisakha, 1944
                             WA NO. 582 OF 2022

    AGAINST JUDGMENT DATED 04.05.2022 IN WP(C) 15148/2022 OF THIS COURT

                                   ---

APPELLANT/PETITIONER:

     DEEPAK NARENDRAN,PROPRIETOR,M/S. NARENDRA REGENCY,PUNALUR-691 305,
     KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.M/S. HARISANKAR V. MENON, MEERA V.MENON

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

  1. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT,
     PUNALUR, KOLLAM -691 305.
  2. THE SECRETARY, KERALA SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ADDL. BENCH,
     SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 010.

     Prayer for interim relief in the Writ Appeal stating that in the
circumstances stated in the appeal memorandum, the High Court be pleased
to stay all recovery steps pursuant to Exts.P1,P2 and P3 assessment orders
issued by 1st respondent, till the final disposal of this Writ Appeal.
     This Writ Appeal coming on for orders on 13.05.2022 upon perusing
the appeal memorandum, the court on the same day passed the following:



                                                                    P.T.O.
 EXT.P1:COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT

FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 (KGST).

EXT.P2:COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT


FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 (KGST).

EXT.P3:COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT


FOR THE YEAR 2018-19 (KGST).

EXT.P6:COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE

2ND RESPONDENT FOR 16-17.

EXT.P7: COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE


2ND RESPONDENT FOR 17-18.

EXT.P8: COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE


2ND RESPONDENT FOR 18-19.

EXT.P9:COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER

BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P10: COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER


BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P11:COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER


BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

                               ---
               V.G.ARUN & P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JJ.
        -----------------------------------------------------
                       W.A.No.582 of 2022
       ------------------------------------------------------
             Dated this the 13th day of May, 2022


                            ORDER

V.G.Arun, J.

The petitioner suffered Exts.P1 to P3 assessment orders.

Being aggrieved, the petitioner filed separate appeals before the

Deputy Commissioner (Appeals). The assessment order for the

year 2016-17 was modified by the first appellate authority and

appeals for the years 2017-18 and 2018-19 rejected. The

petitioner preferred further appeals before the 2 nd respondent and

thereafter approached this Court seeking a direction for

expeditious consideration of the appeals and the stay petitions. By

the impugned judgment, the learned Single Judge directed the 2 nd

respondent to take up Exts.P9 to P11 stay applications filed in

Exts.P6 to P8 appeals and pass orders thereon within six weeks

from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. Till such time,

the recovery proceedings were directed to be kept, subject to the

petitioner depositing a sum equivalent to 20% of the amount due

under the assessment orders. The writ appeal is filed aggrieved by

the limited time granted for remitting 20% of the amount

assessed.

W.A.No.582 of 2022

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 5%

of the amount due under the assessment order has been remitted

and at least two months time should be granted for remitting the

balance amount.

3. The learned Government Pleader opposed the prayer

and submitted that the writ appeal itself should not be

entertained, since sufficient relief was granted by the learned

Single Judge. Considering that the order pertains to three

assessment years and the petitioner has remitted 5% of the

amount assessed, we are inclined to extent the time stipulated for

payment of the 20% till 05.06.2022. The time for disposal of the

appeals and the stay petitions is also extended by a further period

of two weeks. The recovery proceedings will be kept on hold till

the appeals or the stay petitions are heard, provided the 20% is

paid within the extended time.

Sd/-

V.G.ARUN, JUDGE

Sd/-

P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE PV

13-05-2022 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter