Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nizar C.H vs Roy Augustine
2022 Latest Caselaw 2753 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2753 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 March, 2022

Kerala High Court
Nizar C.H vs Roy Augustine on 11 March, 2022
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
     FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 20TH PHALGUNA, 1943
                         MACA NO. 3242 OF 2018
  AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPMV 1157/2015 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT
                         CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, PALA
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:

             NIZAR C.H.
             AGED 56 YEARS
             S/O.HASSANKHAN, MULATHANAM HOUSE, ERATTUPETTA VILLAGE,
             NADACKAL P.O., MEENACHIL TALUK, PIN 686 121.
             BY ADVS.
             C.M.TOMY
             MATHEW SKARIA
             JOY JOSEPH (MUNDACKAL)
             MANU TOM
             BALU TOM


RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

    1        ROY AUGUSTINE, AGED 48 YEARS
             S/O.AUGUSTINE, THANNICKAL HOUSE, EDANADU KARA,
             VALLICHIRA VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, EDANADU P.O., PIN
             686 574.
    2        RAJI MATHEW
             S/O MATHEW, PAMPLANIYIL HOUSE, BHARANANGANAM P.O.,
             MEENACHIL TALUK, PIN-686578.
    3        THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER
             NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
             CSI SQUARE, BAKER HILL, KOTTAYAM, PIN-686 001.
             BY ADVS.
             SRI.J.PRAKASH C.VADAKKAN
             SRI.THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL FOR R3
     THIS    MOTOR   ACCIDENT   CLAIMS     APPEAL   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR
ADMISSION ON 11.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 MACA No.3242/2018              - 2 -


                       C.JAYACHANDRAN, J.
                  --------------------------
                    M.A.C.A.No.3242 OF 2018
                -------------------------------
            Dated, this the 11th day of March, 2022

                              JUDGMENT

The appeal against the award of the Tribunal is

only on the quantum. After hearing the matter for some

time, based on the precedents, this Court was of the

opinion that enhancement can be granted only on certain

heads. Suggestions for settlement were put to the learned

Counsel appearing for the claimant and the learned

Standing Counsel for the Insurance Company. Both having

agreed to the suggestions made by this Court, the

following enhancement is made as per the tabulation

below:

  Sl. Head of Claim                  Amount                 Total amount
  No.                                awarded by             after
                                     the Tribunal           enhancement
                                     (Rs.)                  in appeal
                                                            (Rs.)

  1      Loss of earnings                         24000            42000
                                               (8000x3)        (10500x4)

  2      Transportation Expenses                     3000           3000
  3      Extra nourishment                           5000           5000

  5      Medical Expenses                           38534          38534


  6      Bystander/Attendant              2000         2000
         Expenses
  7      Pain and suffering              32000         32000
  8      Loss of earning due to          79200        166320
         permanent disability      (8000x12x11 (10500x12x11
                                         x7.5%          x12%
  9      Loss of amenities               12500         19000
  10     Future treatment                  Nil         10000
                   Total                196734        318354

Amount enhanced = Rs.1,21,620/- (318354-196734)

2. The Insurance Company shall pay interest for the

amounts awarded by the Tribunal at the rate directed in

the impugned award and for the enhanced amounts at the

rate of 5% from the date of petition. If any amounts have

already been paid, the same shall be granted set off.

Since there was a delay of 139 days in filing the appeal,

the interest for the enhanced quantum shall not run for

the said period. The claimants shall produce the details

of the Bank account before the Insurance Company/Tribunal

within one month from the date of receipt of a certified

copy of this judgment and amount shall be transferred to

the Bank account directly through NEFT/RTGS mode, within

a period of one month thereafter. If the Bank account is

not furnished within the time stipulated, it is made

clear that no interest shall run on the enhanced amount

after the period stipulated by this Court. However, if

the Insurance Company fails to deposit the amount as

directed, interest on enhanced amount shall also run at

the rate ordered by the Tribunal from the date of

petition.

The appeal is allowed as indicated above.

Sd/-

C.JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE jg

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter