Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mavelikkara Taluk Co-Operative ... vs Jayasree Amma K
2022 Latest Caselaw 2560 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2560 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2022

Kerala High Court
Mavelikkara Taluk Co-Operative ... vs Jayasree Amma K on 4 March, 2022
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                  PRESENT

                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

         FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 13TH PHALGUNA, 1943

                             RP NO. 727 OF 2021

    ORDER DATED 10.10.2017 IN WP(C) 28803/2017 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENT NOS. 4 & 5:

     1      MAVELIKKARA TALUK CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. 707,
            REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PULIMOOD JUNCTION,
            MAVELIKKARA P.O., ALAPPUZHA - 690 101.

     2      THE PRESIDENT,
            MANAGING COMMITTEE, MAVELIKKARA TALUK CO-OPERATIVE BANK
            LTD NO.707, PULIMOODU JUNCTION, MAVELIKKARA,
            ALAPUZHA -690 101.

            BY ADVS.
            B.ASHOK SHENOY
            P.S.GIREESH
            RIYAL DEVASSY
            ARJUN R NAIK
            ANILKUMAR C.R.

RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS & RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO 3, 6 & 7:

1           JAYASREE AMMA K., AGED 64, W/O. NANDAKUMAR, SREESHYAM,
            KOTTARKAVU, MAVELIKKAR - 690 101.

2           SARLA S. NAIR, AGED 60, W/O GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR, PALLIYIL
            VEEDU KANDIYOOR, THATTARAMBALAM P.O, MAVELIKARA-690 101.

3           VILASINI PILLAI, BORNEO VILLA, SOUTH FORT, MAVELIKARA-690 101.

4           RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF GENERAL
            MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICE, KOCHI, ERNAKULAM NORTH-682 017.

5           REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-
            695 001.

6           THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT,
            ALAPPUZHA-688 001.
 R.P. No. 727/2020 in
W.P.(C) No. 28803/2017                    :2:



7            THE BRANCH MANAGER, MAVELIKARA TALUK CO-OPERATIVE BANK
             LTD NO.707, MAVELIKARA BRANCH, MAVELIKARA P.O.,
             ALAPPUZHA -690 101.

8            ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK , REPRESENTED BY ITS
             GENERAL MANAGER, P.B.NO.104, OPP. MUNICIPAL TOWN HALL,
             CHUNGAM, ALAPPUZHA, KERALA-688 001.

             BY ADVS.
             R1 BY SRI. N.RAGHURAJ
             SAYUJYA



             R5 AND R6 BY SRI.RIYAL DEVASSY, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
             R8- SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN,SC



      THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.03.2022,

      THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 R.P. No. 727/2020 in
W.P.(C) No. 28803/2017                    :3:




           Dated this the 4th day of March, 2022.

                              ORDER

This Review Petition is filed by respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in W.P.

(C) No. 28803 of 2017 seeking to review the judgment dated 10th

October, 2017 passed by this Court in the aforesaid writ petition, which

was disposed of directing the Review Petitioner i.e., the Mavelikkara

Taluk Co-operative Bank represented by its Secretary to pay the

amount to the writ petitioners/ respondent Nos. 1 to 3, if there are no

other legal impediments standing in the way.

2. Apparently, the writ petitioners have deposited money with

the Co-operative Bank. On maturity, when the amount was sought to

be released, an objection was raised by the Bank stating that fake

bank deposit receipts were made in order to siphon off money from

the Bank. Anyhow, after considering the rival submissions, this Court

disposed of the writ petition directing the Bank to release the money, if

there are no other legal impediments standing in the way. Which thus,

means, the Bank was given an opportunity to adjudicate the issue as

to whether the deposits made by the writ petitioners were actually

made by them or they are making claim on the basis of any fake

deposit receipts.

R.P. No. 727/2020 in

Taking into account the contentions put forth by the Review

Petitioners, I am of the considered opinion that there is no eror

apparent on the face of the record or any other legal infirmities liable

to be interfered with in Review Petition. Therefore, the Review Petition

has no basis, either factual or legal and accordingly, it is dismissed.

sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE.

Rv

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter