Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8015 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 June, 2022
IIN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 8TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 20440 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
V.K.VIJAYAKUMAR,
AGED 59 YEARS
S/O. (LATE) V.K. KUTTIKRISHNAN
VADAKKE VEEDU, VARODE POST,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN CODE 678 572.
BY ADVS.
SHAKTHI PRAKASH
K.DHRUV KUMAR
HARIKRISHNAN M.S.
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,
REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT,
GOVT. SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001.
2 THE SUB REGISTRAR,
SUB REGISTRAR'S OFFICE,
PARALI, PALAKKAD 678 612.
3 ADDL.R3: THE SUB REGISTRAR
SUB REGISTRAR'S OFFICE,
KOTTAYI, PALAKKAD - 678572
ADDL. R3 IS SUO MOTU IMPLEDED AS PER ORDER DATED
29.06.2022 IN WPC NO.20440/2022.
SRI. BIMAL K. NATH, SR.GP.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: :
WP(C) NO. 20440 OF 2022
2
T.R.RAVI, J.
----------------------------------------
WP(C) No.20440 OF 2022
-------------------------------------------
Dated this the 29th day of June, 2022
JUDGMENT
Admit. Government Pleader takes notice for respondents.
2. The prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the
2nd respondent to provisionally accept and register the Sale
Deed, a draft copy of which has been produced, without
insisting that the petitioner's sisters, to be parties to the
document.
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though the
documents have been produced for registration, the same was
denied. It is the settled law that the registering officer under
Rule 67 of the Registration Rules is not expected to enquire
into the validity of a document brought for registration or to
attend to any written or verbal protest against the registration
of a document. The objections that the Registrar is bound to
consider are enumerated in the Rules. The 2 nd respondent,
according to the petitioner is under a wrong assumption that WP(C) NO. 20440 OF 2022
by amendment of the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act,
2005, the female members of the joint family were granted
coparcenary right and the said position would apply in the
case of the petitioner also, and has hence refused registration.
The petitioner submits that as far as the State of Kerala is
concerned, the Joint Hindu Family system was abolished by
Act 30 of 1976. I do not think that this Court should go into the
merits of the contentions in this writ petition.
4. The writ petition is disposed of directing the 3 rd
respondent to accept and register the sale deed which is
produced for registration. It is made clear that this Court is
not expressing any opinion regarding the rights of the female
members and if any such right is put forward in a civil
proceedings, the registration of the document will be subject
to any decision that may be taken by the Civil Court.
Sd/-
T.R.RAVI
JUDGE sn WP(C) NO. 20440 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20440/2022
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED EXECUTED BY PETITIONER'S FATHER BEARING DOC. NOS. 2391/2003 OF SRO PARALI.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE GIFT DEED EXECUTED BY PETITIONER'S BROTHER BEARING NO. 2392/2003 OF SRO PARALI.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE PURCHASE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER'S FATHER DATED 21.06.1977.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE DRAFT SALE DEED.
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPIES OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 30.05.2022.
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 18.01.2022.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL
//TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!