Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Meenakshi V.V vs Padanna Grama Panchayath
2022 Latest Caselaw 8013 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8013 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 June, 2022

Kerala High Court
Meenakshi V.V vs Padanna Grama Panchayath on 29 June, 2022
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
     WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 8TH ASHADHA, 1944
                         WP(C) NO. 4335 OF 2022
PETITIONER:

          MEENAKSHI V.V
          AGED 62 YEARS
          W/O. KANNAN V.V., VADAKKE VEETTIL HOUSE,
          THADIYANKOVVAL, UDINOOR P.O, HOSDURG TALUK, KASARGODE
          DISTRICT, PIN - 671 310
          BY ADVS.
          M.ANUROOP
          SHIJU PUTHIYA PURAYIL


RESPONDENTS:

    1     PADANNA GRAMA PANCHAYATH
          REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PADANNA, HOSDURG TALUK,
          KASARGODE DISTRICT, PIN - 671 312
    2     THE SECRETARY
          PADANNA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PADANNA, HOSDURG TALUK,
          KASARGODE DISTRICT, PIN - 671 312
    3     SHYNU PONNARIYAN
          AGED 39 YEARS
          D/O. CHANDRAMATHI, THADIYANKOVVAL, UDINOOR P.O, HOSDURG
          TALUK, KASARGODE DISTRICT, PIN - 671 310
          BY ADVS.
          PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH
          K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR - R3
          VANDANA MENON
          VIMAL VIJAY



     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 4335 OF 2022
                                2


               P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
              ------------------------------
              W.P.(C).No. 4335 of 2022
      ----------------------------------------------
       Dated this the 29th day of June, 2022

                       JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with the following

prayers:

"(a) call for the records leading upto Ext.P4 Lawyer Notice and direct the 1st respondent to conduct further enquiry regarding the building permit.

(b) direct the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P4 Lawyer Notice by affording an opportunity for the petitioner to redress his grievance regarding the construction of the building by the 3 rd respondent which is an unauthorised construction.

(c) direct the 1st respondent to cancel the building permit which is issued in favour of the 3 rd respondent in the event of her failure to produce all the documents relating to building constructed in R S No.134/2pt 113 of Padanna Grama Panchayath.

(d) pass any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit to issue and the petitioner may pray from time to time."[SIC]

2. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the

construction made by the 3rd respondent is violating WP(C) NO. 4335 OF 2022

certain building Rules. The same is disputed by the

counsel for the 3rd respondent. The counsel takes me

through Ext.P2 photographs. I do not want to make any

observation about the same. The counsel for the 3 rd

respondent submitted that the construction is already

over and the 3rd respondent is residing in the house.

3. If the petitioner has got any grievance against

the construction or against the building, the petitioner is

free to approach the 2nd respondent with a

representation and if such a representation is received,

the 2nd respondent will consider the same and pass

appropriate orders in it, after giving an opportunity of

hearing to the petitioner and the 3rd respondent.

Therefore this writ petition is disposed of in the

following manner:

i. If the petitioner has got any grievance about

the building of the 3rd respondent, the petitioner is free to

submit a representation before the 2nd respondent, within

a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy

of this judgment.

WP(C) NO. 4335 OF 2022

ii. Once such a representation is received, the 2 nd

respondent will consider the same and pass appropriate

orders in it, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate,

within a period of three months from the date of receipt

of the representation.

iii. Before passing final orders, an opportunity of

hearing should be given to the petitioner and the 3 rd

respondent.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN DM JUDGE WP(C) NO. 4335 OF 2022

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 4335/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE UDINOOR VILALGE OFFICER DATED 25-01-2022 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE LIE OF THE BUILDING OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT AND OLD MUD HOUSE OF THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE CAVEAT O.P FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT AGAINST THE PETITIONER DATED 29-01-2022 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 10-01-2022 ISSUED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS : NIL

//TRUE COPY//

PA TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter