Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7987 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 8TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 20541 OF 2022
PETITIONER
T.D. RAJU,
AGED 60 YEARS
s/O. DAMODARAN, RESIDING AT THARAYIL (THAMASA),
ARUNAPURAM, PULIYANNOOR VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
P.C.HARIDAS
P.S.GOVIND
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001.
2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
COLLECTORATE, KOTTAYAM 686 001.
3 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
CIVIL STATION, PALA 686 575.
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
PULIYANNOOR , PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 686 573.
5 ARYA PRATHAP,
AGED 30 YEARS
S/O. PRATHAPACHANDRAN, PULIYANNOOR KARA,
PULIYANNOOR VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT- 686 573.
SMT.SURYA BINOY (SR.GP)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO.20541 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 29th day of June, 2022
The petitioner is before this Court seeking to direct the 3 rd
respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer to consider Ext.P2
complaint and take necessary action thereon within a time
limit.
2. The petitioner states that the 5th respondent is the
owner of 8 Cents of wetland near the property of the petitioner.
The 5th respondent started reclamation of the wetland
encroaching upon the PWD puramboke land. The 5 th
respondent has also blocked a natural drainage in the area.
The petitioner and other local residents filed Ext.P2 complaint
before the Revenue Divisional Officer. The complaint was
submitted on 10.06.2022. Unless the 3rd respondent takes
action on Ext.P2, the petitioner and other local residents will
be put to untold hardship, contended the petitioner. WP(C) NO.20541 OF 2022
3. Government Pleader entered appearance on behalf
of respondents 1 to 4. The Government Pleader submitted that
according to the instructions received, Ext.P2 has not been
received by the Revenue Divisional Officer.
4. The petitioner would point out that the petitioner has
produced acknowledgment receipt from the office of the
Revenue Divisional Officer evidencing submission of the
complaint on 10.06.2022.
5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned Government Pleader representing
respondents 1 to 4. In view of the nature of releif being
granted in this writ petition, notice to the 5th respondent is
dispensed with.
6. The contention of the petitioner is that the 5th
respondent is making illegal reclamation of land and
encroaching upon the PWD puramboke land also. The natural
flow of drainage water is blocked by the 5 th respondent. It is in
such circumstances that the petitioner along with others has WP(C) NO.20541 OF 2022
filed Ext.P2 complaint.
7. Since Ext.P2 complaint raises an issue of public
nuisance, this Court is of the view that the 3 rd respondent-
Revenue Divisional Officer shall consider the same and take
such steps as are warranted.
In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of
directing the 3rd respondent to consider and pass appropriate
orders as found necessary, on Ext.P2 complaint filed by the
petitioner, with notice to the 5th respondent. The petitioner
shall serve a copy of the writ petition along with the certified
copy of this judgment on the 3 rd respondent. It is made clear
that this Court has not pronounced anything on merits, on the
complaint of the petitioner.
sd/-
N.NAGARESH JUDGE hmh WP(C) NO.20541 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20541/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 11.05.2022 GIVEN BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AND OTHERS BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!