Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7986 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 8TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 21104 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
THE POLPULLY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,
NO. F 1198, POLPULLY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,
PIN - 678 552, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADV O.D.SIVADAS
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),
AYAKAR BHAVAN, SHAKTAN NAGAR, THRISSUR, PIN - 680 001.
2 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD 2, AAYKAR BHAVAN, ENGLISH CHURCH ROAD, PALAKKAD,
PIN - 678 014.
BY SRI JOSE JOSEPH, SC IT DEPT.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
29.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 21104 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society
registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969.
Ext.P1 order of assessment was issued against the petitioner on
26.12.2018. In the assessment order, petitioner's claim for
deduction under Section 80P was rejected on the ground that
there was no evidence to show that petitioner satisfied the
ingredients of the Primary Agricultural Credit Society as
contemplated under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.
2. While assailing the assessment order before the 1 st
respondent, petitioner has sought to canvass that the
judgment of the Supreme Court in Mavilayi Service Co-
operative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax [2021
(1) KLT 485] now governs the field thereby rendering the
assessment itself as incorrect.
3. Since the petitioner has already preferred an appeal as
Ext.P3 and the same is pending consideration before the 1 st
respondent and has now been transferred to the National
Faceless Appeal Centre, I deem it fit that this writ petition be
disposed of directing the appropriate Appellate Authority to
consider the appeal in a time bound manner. WP(C) NO. 21104 OF 2022
4. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the appropriate
Appellate Authority to consider and pass appropriate orders on
Ext.P3, as expeditiously as possible.
5. Till the disposal of the appeal, no coercive steps shall
be initiated against the petitioner pursuant to Ext.P1
assessment order.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE DK WP(C) NO. 21104 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 21104/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 26/12/2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 26/12/2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT OF UNDER SECTION 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 23/01/2019 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING DATED 9/6/2022 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN RELATION TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17.
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 6/09/2021 IN WP(C) NO.18004 OF 2021 RENDERED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!