Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7978 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 8TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 16619 OF 2022
PETITIONERS:
1 JOMIN ANTONY
RESIDING AT PULLICKAL HOUSE, THANAL - 64,
BOAT JETTY, CHANDY ROAD,
VADUTHALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 023.
2 VARGHESE JOSEPH
RESIDING AT POOTHAMPILLY HOUSE,
EAST OF PUMP HOUSE, TOLL GATE ROAD,
VADUTHALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 023.
3 ANTONY SHIBU
RESIDING AT KOLAPARAMBIL HOUSE,
THANAL - 73, BOAT JETTY,
CHANDY ROAD, VADUTHALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 023.
4 RAJESH K.S.
RESIDING AT KANNATH HOUSE, THANAL - 78,
BOAT JETTY, CHANDY ROAD,
VADUTHALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 023.
5 SUNIL P.G.
RESIDING AT PUTHUMANA HOUSE, THANAL - 79,
BOAT JETTY, CHANDY ROAD,
VADUTHALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 023.
6 JAMES ROY K.A.
RESIDING AT KALLUVEETIL HOUSE, THANAL - 98,
BOAT JETTY, CHANDY ROAD,
VADUTHALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 023.
7 STANSILAUS T.V.
RESIDING AT THEKUMTALA HOUSE, THANAL - 77,
BOAT JETTY, CHANDY ROAD,
VADUTHALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 023.
WP(C) NO. 16619 of 2022
2
8 T.V.RAPHEL
RESIDING AT THEKUMTALA HOUSE, THANAL - 76,
BOAT JETTY, CHANDY ROAD,
VADUTHALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 023.
9 ANTONY ANEESH
RESIDING AT KOCHERY HOUSE, BOAT JETTY,
CHANDY ROAD, VADUTHALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 023.
BY ADVS.
K.JAJU BABU (SR.)
M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI
BRIJESH MOHAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 KOCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
BOAT JETTY, COCHIN - 682 011
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2 THE SECRETARY
KOCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
BOAT JETTY, COCHIN - 682 011.
BY ADV K.JANARDHANA SHENOY
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 29.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 16619 of 2022
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 29th day of June, 2022
The petitioners, who are residing on either side of the by-
road starting from the side of KSEB Post No.BJ-19/15 situated
on the side of the Chandy Road at Vaduthala, are before this
Court seeking to direct the respondents to carry out
repair/maintenance work of the by-road as requested in Ext.P2,
without further delay.
2. The petitioners state that the road in question is in a
pitiable and dilapidated stage. Vehicular traffic is difficult and
pedestrian traffic is cumbersome. Though the local residents
made repeated representations and request to the 1 st
respondent seeking repair and maintenance of the road, no
positive steps have been taken.
3. The petitioners state that the respondents have
taken a decision to include the road in its Asset Register and it WP(C) NO. 16619 of 2022
has been included in the Asset Register now. However, the
respondents are hesitant to repair and maintain the road.
4. Standing Counsel entered appearance for
respondents 1 and 2. The Standing Counsel pointed out that in
the normal course, the roads vested with the Municipal
Corporation will be maintained properly, depending upon the
availability of funds and other priority. In this case, since the
petitioners have submitted a representation to the Secretary to
the Kochi Municipal Corporation, the issue will be looked into by
the Secretary.
5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners
and also the learned Standing Counsel representing the
respondents.
6. Grievance of the petitioners is that the road near
their residence has been included in the Asset Register of the
Corporation. When the road vests with the Corporation, the
Corporation authorities are bound to repair and maintain the WP(C) NO. 16619 of 2022
road properly. The road is in a dilapidated condition and the
vehicular as well as pedestrian traffic is difficult now. It is in
such circumstances that the petitioners have submitted Ext.P2
representation.
7. In view of the facts projected by the petitioners in the
writ petition and after hearing the arguments raised on either
side, this Court is of the view that the Secretary to the Kochi
Corporation shall consider the grievance raised by the petitioner
and others in Ext.P2, at the earliest.
In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of
directing the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P2 representation
and take appropriate decision thereon, within a period of two
weeks.
Sd/-
N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk WP(C) NO. 16619 of 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16619/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING STARTING POINT OF THE BYE ROAD FROM CHANDY ROAD.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 9/8/2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF THE AGENDA TAKEN BY THE COUNCIL OF THE KOCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ON 08/03/2022.
RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS : NIL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!