Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7929 Ker
Judgement Date : 29 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 8TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(CRL.) NO. 421 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
ANBU ROSI .V,
AGED 24 YEARS
NOW RESIDING AT SNEHITHA GENDER HELP DESK,
KUNNUMPURAM - CIVIL STATION ROAD, THAZHVARAM LN,
KUNNUMPURAM, THRIKKAKARA, KAKKANAD, KERALA 682021
HAVING HER ADDRESS AT 4/80-B, METTU STREET,
VELLAIYUR, VILLUPURAM, TAMILNADU, PIN-606107.
BY ADVS.A.K.PREETHA
C.ANIL KUMAR
JITHIN VARGHESE
AMRITHA SOMASUNDARAN
NIMISHA M.G.
RESPONDENT/S:
1 NEELAKANDAN, AGED 27 YEARS,
ALINCHUVADU,PAYYANANGADI VIA, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM,
PIN-676101.
2 VIJAY, AGED 26 YEARS,
S/O.KUPPUSWAMY, 4/80-B, METTU STREET, VELLAIYUR,
VILLUPURAM, TAMILNADU, PIN-606107.
3 KUPPUSWAMY, 4/80-B, METTU STREET,
VELLAIYUR, VILLUPURAM, TAMILNADU, PIN-606107.
4 DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE,
UPHILL POST, MALAPPURAM, PIN-676505
5 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TIRUR POLICE STATION, TIRUR
676 101.
6 ADDL. R6: THE STATE POLICE CHIEF OF KERALA,
POLICE HEADQUARTERS,
VAZHUTHACAUD P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004.
7 ADDL.R7: THE STATE POLICE CHIEF OF TAMIL NADU,
POST BOX NO.601,DR.RADHAKRISHNAN SALAI, MYLAPORE,
CHENNAI-600 004
WP(CRL.) NO. 421 OF 2022
-2-
8 ADDL.R8: THE STATE POLICE CHIEF OF MAHARASHTRA,
POLICE HEADQUARTERS, OLD COUNCIL HALL, SHAEED
BHAGAT SINGH MARG, CITY-MUMBAI, PIN-400 001.
ADDL.R6 TO R8 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 19-05-
2022 IN WP(CRL)421/2022.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 29.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
WP(CRL.) NO. 421 OF 2022
-3-
K. Vinod Chandran & Jayachandran.C, JJ.
-------------------------------------
WP(CRL.) NO. 421 OF 2022
-------------------------------------
Dated, this the 29th day of June, 2022.
JUDGMENT
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J
The above writ petition was filed for the custody of the child
by the mother, which stands restored to the mother. The 1st
respondent is the father's cousin, the 2nd respondent is the father
and the 3rd respondent is the grandfather of the child. The
allegation was that, respondents 1 to 3 took the child away from the
legal custody of the petitioner. The police, on enquiry, traced out
the child and resumed the custody, to the petitioner. We also
interacted with the child and the mother after the custody was
resumed and are satisfied that it is in the best interest of the child
that the mother has its custody. We kept the matter pending only
since there was no appearance for respondents 1 to 3, from whose WP(CRL.) NO. 421 OF 2022
custody the child was resumed to the mother. Respondent No.1 has
not been served with notice till now. However, respondents 2 and 3
have been served notice and there is no appearance.
In the above circumstances, the child having been restored to
the custody of the mother, which we find to be appropriate, the writ
petition stands closed.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE
Sd/-
C. JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE
uu WP(CRL.) NO. 421 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 421/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 18.4.2022.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL REPORT OF THE PETITIONER.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE E MAIL SUBMITTED BY THE ORGANIZATION DHISHA SEEKING ASSISTANCE.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!