Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ansar Kabeer vs The Authorised Officer/Manager
2022 Latest Caselaw 7764 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7764 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2022

Kerala High Court
Ansar Kabeer vs The Authorised Officer/Manager on 28 June, 2022
WP(C) No.20398/2022                        1/5

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                        PRESENT
                         THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
                  Tuesday, the 28th day of June 2022 / 7th Ashadha, 1944
                                 WP(C) NO. 20398 OF 2022
   PETITIONER:

          ANSAR KABEER, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O KABEER, SABEENA MANZIL, MULLASERRI
          MANGALAPURAM, TRIVANDRUM - 695317

   RESPONDENTS:

      1. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER/MANAGER, AXIS BANK LIMITED, 2ND FLOOR, NIHAL
         COMPLEX, KARAMANA, TRIVANDRUM 695002.
      2. BRANCH MANAGER, KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES, MANACAUD BRANCH,
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695009


        Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
   stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
   pleased to issue a direction directing 1st respondent to consider and
   dispose the Ext.P6 till disposal of Writ Petition.


        This petition coming on for admission upon perusing the petition and
   the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and upon hearing the arguments of
   SRI.M.R.SARIN, Advocate for the petitioner and of SRI.SALIL NARAYANAN,
   STANDING COUNSEL for R2, the court passed the following:
 WP(C) No.20398/2022                             2/5



                                   GOPINATH P., JUDGE.
                           -----------------------------------------------
                                 W.P.(C)No.20398 of 2022
                          --------------------------------------------------
                          Dated this the 28th day of June, 2022

                                             ORDER

The petitioner availed a loan from the 1 st respondent bank in

respect of which proceedings under the Securitisation and

Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security

Interest Act (hereinafter referred to as the SARFAESI Act) were

initiated to recover the amounts due from the petitioner. This

Court, through judgment dated 1.6.2022, had directed that, if the

petitioner pays an amount of Rs.18,25,000/- together with any

accrued interest and charges on or before 30.6.2022 to the 1 st

respondent bank, further coercive steps against the petitioner shall

be kept in abeyance. This was also taking into consideration the

fact that an amount of Rs.14 lakhs had been paid by the petitioner

to the 1st respondent bank towards discharge of liabilities.

2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner stating

that the petitioner has prized a chitty from the 2 nd respondent KSFE

and he intends to utilise that amount to pay the amount of

Rs.18,25,000/- along with future interest and cost as directed in

Ext.P5 judgment. It is submitted that the 1st respondent bank has

to handover the documents pledged with the 1st respondent

forthwith to enable the petitioner to deposit the same with the WP(C) No.20398/2022 3/5

KSFE for creation of his security for release of the amount under the

prized chitty.

3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1 st

respondent bank states that the documents mortgaged by the

petitioner are deposited with the Central Processing Centre of the 1 st

respondent bank at Hyderabad and it will take some time for the

bank to handover the documents after payment is effected.

4. When this writ petition is taken up for consideration

today, it is the submission of Sri. Salil Narayanan, the learned

counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent KSFE that the petitioner

has prized yet another chitty from the very same branch of KSFE and

has provided the documents relating to another property belonging

to the petitioner as security for release of the amount under that

chitty. It is submitted that preliminary enquiries have shown that

the value of the said property will also cover the liability of the other

prized chitty as well. It is submitted that the documents have been

forwarded to the Regional Office of the 2 nd respondent for the

purpose of sanction and a period of two weeks is required to process

the same.

5. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances, I

direct that the period for payment of Rs.18,25,000/- be extended by WP(C) No.20398/2022 4/5

the 1st respondent bank for a period of two weeks from 30.6.2022 on

condition that the petitioner pays all accrued interest and charges to

the 1st respondent bank till the date of payment.

Post after two weeks.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P.

                                                               JUDGE
           acd




28-06-2022                        /True Copy/                          Assistant Registrar
 WP(C) No.20398/2022                 5/5

                       APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20398/2022
Exhibit P6            THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE

PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 4.6.2022

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter