Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hidayathulla vs The Authorized Officer Under ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 7729 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7729 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2022

Kerala High Court
Hidayathulla vs The Authorized Officer Under ... on 28 June, 2022
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                        PRESENT
                     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
           TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 7TH ASHADHA, 1944
                              WP(C) NO. 7477 OF 2022
PETITIONER:

                  HIDAYATHULLA
                  AGED 50 YEARS
                  S/O. HABEEBULLA, 'FIRDOUS', VENKULAM, EDAVA P.O,
                  VARKALA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695311.

                  BY ADVS.
                  R.RAJESH (VARKALA)
                  M.KIRANLAL
                  T.S.SARATH
                  MANU RAMACHANDRAN
                  SAMEER M NAIR



RESPONDENTS:

       1          THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER UNDER SECURITIZATION ACT
                  KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, (ERSTWHILE
                  THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD),
                  REGIONAL OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, P.B. NO. 5122,
                  EAST FORT P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695023.

       2          THE BRANCH MANAGER
                  KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, (ERSTWHILE
                  THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD),
                  NADAYARA BRANCH, NADAYARA, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
                  DISTRICT - 695145.

                  BY ADV SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM SC THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST.
                  CO.OP BANK


THIS       WRIT    PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
28.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C)No.7477/2022                    2

                                JUDGMENT

Petitioner has approached this Court challenging proceedings

initiated under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets

and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (hereinafter referred to as the

SARFAESI Act) for recovery of the amounts due upon mortgage loan

facility availed by the petitioner.

2. During the course of hearing, petitioner has confined the relief

to an opportunity for repaying the overdue amount in instalments and to

obtain regularisation of the loan account.

3. It was submitted on behalf of the respondent bank that the

petitioner committed default in repayment and the overdue amount is

Rs.5,82,969/- as on 28.2.2022. It was further submitted that though

proceedings for recovery have been initiated, as a matter of indulgence,

the respondent bank is willing to accept repayment of the overdue

amount in limited instalments and regularise the loan account.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the

learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Bank.

5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the

situation now prevailing, apart from the submissions made as recorded

above and taking into account the fact that the petitioner has undertaken

to clear off the overdue amount along with regular EMIs, I am of the view

that the petitioner can be granted an opportunity to clear off the overdue

amount in fifteen (15) equal instalments first of which shall be paid on or

before 30.7.2022 and thereafter, if the amount so directed is repaid

within the time as directed above, to have the loan account regularised.

6. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent bank to

accept repayment of the entire overdue amount of Rs.5,82,969/- along

with bank charges from the petitioner and regularise the loan account of

the petitioner on the following conditions:

(i) The overdue amount of Rs.5,82,969/- together with any accrued interest and charges shall be repaid in fifteen (15) equated monthly instalments.

(ii) The first instalment shall be paid on or before 30.7.2022 and the subsequent instalments shall be paid on the last working day of every succeeding month.

(iii) Petitioner shall continue to pay the regular EMI's along with the instalments as directed above.

(iv) In the event of default of any one instalment, the respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with law.

(v) In order to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amounts, all coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P.

JUDGE acd

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 7477/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 21.01.2022.

Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT OF THE PETITIONER DATED 11.02.2022.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter