Sidharthan vs State Of Kerala
2022 Latest Caselaw 7710 Ker

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
         TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 7TH ASHADHA, 1944
                         WP(C) NO. 20990 OF 2022
PETITIONER:

              SIDHARTHAN
              AGED 52 YEARS
              S/O.RAMAN, PUTHUVEETTIL, P.O.PAPPINIVATTOM,
              MATHILAKAM, THRISSUR - 680685.
              BY ADV AVANEESH KOYIKKARA


RESPONDENTS:

     1        STATE OF KERALA
              REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
              GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
     2        KERALA STATE REMOTE SENSING AND ENVIRONMENT CENTER,
              1ST FLOOR, VIKAS BHAVAN, NEAR LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY,
              UNIVERSITY OF KERALA SENATE HOUSE CAMPUS, PMG,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST., PIN- 695 033,
              REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.
     3        REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
              REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, IRINJALAKUDA, MINI CIVIL
              STATION, CHEMMANDA ROAD, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR - 680125.
     4        AGRICULTURAL FIELD OFFICER,
              KRISHI BHAVAN, MATHILAKAM, MATHILAKAM.P.O,
              THRISSUR -680685.
     5        LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE,
              (REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER AGRICULTURAL OFFICER) KRISHI
              BHAVAN, MATHILAKAM, MATHILAKAM.P.O, THRISSUR -680685.


              SRI. SYAMANTHAK B. S. (GP)


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
28.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 20990 OF 2022

                                2




                             JUDGMENT

Dated this the 28th day of June, 2022

The petitioner, who is owner of 1.92 Ares of land in

Pappinivattom Village of Kodungallur Taluk in Thrissur District,

has filed this writ petition seeking to direct the 3 rd respondent-

Revenue Divisional Officer to consider and pass orders on

Ext.P4 application within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner states that he is owner of 1.92 Ares of

land situated in Survey No.156/8-7 of Pappinivattom Village,

Kodungallur Taluk in Thrissur District. The land is a garden land.

It is not cultivated with paddy. It is not fit for paddy cultivation

either. However, the land is included in the Data Bank and is

described as paddy land in Revenue records also.

3. The petitioner wants to use the land for other

purposes. Hence, the petitioner filed Ext.P4 application in Form-

5, invoking Rule 4(d) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land WP(C) NO. 20990 OF 2022

and Wetland Rules, 2008. The application was filed on

24.05.2022. The application is not disposed of so far. Unless

the application is considered expeditiously, the petitioner will be

put to untold hardship and loss, contends the petitioner.

4. The Government Pleader representing the

respondents resisted the writ petition. The Government Pleader

controverted all material allegations made by the petitioner, in

the writ petition. The Government Pleader, however, submitted

that since the petitioner has invoked a statutory remedy under

the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and

Wetland Act, 2008, the application submitted by the petitioner

can be considered by the competent authority in accordance

with law, provided the application is received, is complete in all

respects and is supported by all necessary documents.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

and the learned Government Pleader representing the

respondents.

WP(C) NO. 20990 OF 2022

6. The petitioner is owner of 1.92 Ares of land situated

in Survey No.156/8-7 of Pappinivattom Village, Kodungallur

Taluk in Thrissur District. The land is included in the Data Bank

of paddy land and wetland prepared under Section 5(4)(i) of the

Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008.

According to the petitioner, the land owned by him is neither

paddy land nor wet land. The land is not suitable for paddy

cultivation. The petitioner wants to use the land for other

purposes and hence he has filed an application in Form-5

seeking to remove the land from Data Bank.

7. The Form-5 application has been filed by the

petitioner invoking his statutory right under Rule 4(d) of the

Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008.

The application being a statutory application, the competent

authority has a legal duty to consider the application in

accordance with law, within a reasonable time.

The writ petition is therefore disposed of directing the 3 rd

respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer to consider Ext.P4 WP(C) NO. 20990 OF 2022

Form-5 application submitted by the petitioner if the same is

received, supported by all requisite documents and paying

prescribed fee, if any, and to pass orders thereon in

accordance with law, within a period of three months.

Sd/-

N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk WP(C) NO. 20990 OF 2022

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20990/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 21.04.2021 ISSUED BY THE PAPPINIVATTOM VILLAGE OFFICE.

Exhibit P2 A COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 20.03.2022 ISSUED BY THE PAPPINIVATTOM VILLAGE OFFICE.

Exhibit P3 A COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF DATA BANK PUBLISHED IN GAZETTE ON 18.09.2020.

Exhibit P4 A COPY OF THE FORM.5 APPLICATION DATED 24.5.2022 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P4(A) A COPY OF THE FEE PAYMENT CHALLAN NO.KL022923961202122M DATED 29.01.2022 RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS : NIL