Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6272 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 13TH JYAISHTA, 1944
CRL.MC NO. 4719 OF 2021
CRIME NO.2399 OF 1991 OF HOSDURG POLICE SATIONA ND NOW THE CASE
AGAINST THE PETITIONER IS PENDING AS IN CC 345/2021 OF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I,HOSDRUG
PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED:
1 ABDUL NAZAR,
AGED 30 YEARS
S/O.HAMEED, MADIYAN HOUSE, AJANUR VILLAGE,
KASARAGOD, PIN-671 531.
BY ADVS.
RAHUL SASI
NEETHU PREM
VIVEK.P.K
RESPONDENTS/STATE&COMPLAINANTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 031.
2 P.V.ABDUL KHADER,
AGED 59 YEARS
S/O.ANTHUNJI, PALLIKKAL VEEDU, BEDADKKA P.O.,
KASARAGOD, PIN-671 541.
*3 K.C.IRSHAD,
S/O.LATE K.C.MAHIN, SHAD MANSION, MOGRAL, PUTHUR P.O.,
KASARAGOD, PIN-671 124.
* CORRECTED AND REPLACED AS PER ORDER DATED 3.6.22 IN
CRL.M.A.2/21.
THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF 3RD RESPONDENT IS CORRECTED AND
REPLACED AS
K.C.SHAMSHAD,
W/O.NAZIR P.S.M., K.C. COMPOUND, MOGRAL, MOGRAL PUTHUR
P.O., KASARAGOD TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT
AS PER ORDER DATED 03.06.2022 IN CRL.M.A.2/2021 IN
CRL.M.C.4719/21
BY ADVS.
SMT.NIMA JACOB, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
NIRMAL V NAIR
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL. MC NO.4719 OF 2021
2
ORDER
Dated this the 03rd day of June, 2022
The petitioner is the 2 nd accused in Crime
No.399/1991 of Hosdurg Police Station which is now
pending as C.C. No.345/2021 before the Judicial First
Class Magistrate Court-I, Hosdurg. The offences
alleged against the petitioners are under Sections
143, 147, 148, 427, 324 read with Section 149 of the
Indian Penal Code (IPC).
2. The allegation against the petitioner and
the other accused is that, on 04.07.1991, at 2.30
pm, the petitioner along with other accused
committed rioting and pelted stones at a bus bearing
registration No.KRC 547 causing damage to the tune
of Rs.1600/- and also causing injuries to a passenger
therein. Annexure-A1 is the final report submitted by
the police in this case. It is pointed out that all other
accused have faced the trial and as per Annexure A2
and A3 judgments, all of them were acquitted. The CRL. MC NO.4719 OF 2021
case against the petitioner has been split up and the
same is now pending as C.C. No.345/2021. This
Crl.M.C. is filed for quashing all further proceedings
pursuant to Annexure-1A final report.
3. Heard Sri. Rahul Sasi, the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner, Smt. Nima Jacob the
learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the 1st
respondent and Sri.Nirmal V.Nair, the learned counsel
appearing for the respondents 2 and 3.
4. The prayer for quashing the proceedings is
sought mainly for the reason that the dispute
between the parties has been settled and to
substantiate the same, Annexure A4 and A6 affidavits
sworn by respondents 2 and 3 are produced. The
fact of settlement is acknowledged in the aforesaid
affidavit and it is also specifically stated that the
respondents 2 and 3 have no subsisting grievances
against the petitioner herein. The respondents 2 and
3 also clearly expressed their no objection in CRL. MC NO.4719 OF 2021
quashing the proceedings against the petitioner. The
learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 and
3 also confirms the aforesaid settlement and supports
the prayer sought for by the petitioners herein. The
learned Public Prosecutor upon instructions submits
that the veracity of the settlement is verified by the
Station House Officer concerned by recording the
statement of de facto complainant and found to be
genuine.
5. On going through the nature of allegations
as contained in Annexure-A1 final report, it can be
seen that the dispute is basically private in nature.
No serious offences are attributed against the
petitioner. Considering the settlement arrived at
between the parties, the chances of a successful
prosecution are very bleak and hence no fruitful
purpose would be served if the proceedings is
allowed to continue. Therefore, I am of the view that
going by the decision in Gian Singh v. State of
Punjab and Another [2012(4)KLT 108], this is a CRL. MC NO.4719 OF 2021
fit case in which the powers of this Court under
Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be invoked.
Accordingly this Crl.M.C. is allowed. All further
proceedings in C.C.No.345/2021 pending before the
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Hosdurg
pursuant to Crime No.399/1991 of Hosdurg Police
Station are hereby quashed.
Sd/-
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
JUDGE SKP/3.6 CRL. MC NO.4719 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 4719/2021
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT AND MEMO OF EVIDENCE IN CRIME NO.399 OF 1991 OF HOSDURG POLICE STATION.
ANNEXURE A2 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.10.1997 IN CC NO.468 OF 1995 BY THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT I, HOSDURG.
ANNEXURE A3 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 06.12.2007 IN CC NO.48 OF 2006 BY THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT I, HOSDURG.
ANNEXURE A4 THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 23.07.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE A5 THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 27.09.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE A6 THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 11.11.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A.TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!