Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6131 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 June, 2022
Crl.M.C.No.2279/2022 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 11TH JYAISHTA, 1944
CRL.MC NO. 2279 OF 2022
CRIME NO.683/2014 OF ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION, Kollam
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 1065/2014 OF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II, KOLLAM
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1-4:
1 SHIBIN SAMSON,
AGED 32 YEARS,
NELLIKKATHU HOUSE, NADUVILAKKARA P.O,
MAYYANADU, KOLLAM, PIN - 691 589.
2 KELVIN JERMIAS,
AGED 33 YEARS,
VINCY LAND, PULLICHARA CHERRY,
MAYYANAD, KOLLAM, PIN - 691 304.
3 ENOSH ALEX,
AGED 28 YEARS,
PANAVILA,PULLICHIRA P.O, KOLLAM, PIN - 691 304.
4 SHIBIN GOMEZ,
AGED 33 YEARS,
SHAJI SHINE,PULLICHIRA P.O, KOLLAM, PIN - 691 304.
BY ADVS.
ARUN BABU
ARUN K.J.
ALEN.C.LAZAR
RESPONDENTS/STATE/COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682
031.
2 THE SUB INSPECTOR, ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION,
KOLLAM, PIN - 691 304.
Crl.M.C.No.2279/2022 2
3 JOBY JOHN,
AGED 29 YEARS,
CHARUVILA HOUSE, MAYYANDU P.O.,
KOLLAM, PIN - 691 303.
BY ADV C.S.SUMESH
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C.No.2279/2022 3
ORDER
The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.683 of 2014 of
Eravipuram Police Station, which is now pending as C.C.No.1065 of
2014 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Kollam. The
offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 143, 147,
148, 294(b), 323, 324 read with Section 149 IPC.
2. The prosecution case is that on 03.05.2014 the petitioner
along with some unidentifiable persons assaulted the 3 rd respondent/de
facto complainant and caused injuries to him. Annexure-A1 is the final
report submitted in this case. This Crl.M.C. is filed for quashing all
further proceedings pursuant to Annexure-A1 final report.
3. Heard Sri.Arun Babu, learned counsel for the petitioners,
Sri.C.S.Hrithwik, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and
Sri.C.S.Sumesh learned counsel for the 3rd respondent.
4. Prayer for quashing the proceedings is sought mainly on
the ground that the dispute between the parties has been settled.
Annexure-A2 affidavit sworn by the 3rd respondent/de facto
complainant is filed along with this Crl.M.C. to substantiate the
settlement. In the said affidavit, the 3 rd respondent/de facto
complainant had specifically acknowledged the aforesaid settlement
and also conveyed the no-objection to quash the proceedings against
the petitioners herein. The learned counsel appearing for the 3 rd
respondent/de facto complainant also confirms the same. The learned
Public Prosecutor, upon instructions, submitted that the Station House
Officer concerned has verified the veracity of the same and found it to
be genuine.
5. The allegations would reveal that the dispute is purely
private in nature. In such circumstances, by applying the principles
laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State
of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], proceedings can be
quashed by invoking the powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
This is particularly because, on account of the settlement, no fruitful
purpose would be served by allowing the prosecution to continue.
In the result, this Crl.M.C. is allowed, and Annexure-A1 final
report submitted in crime No.683 of 2014 of Eravipuram Police Station
and all further proceedings in C.C.No.1065 of 2014 on the file of the
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Kollam, against the petitioners
are hereby quashed.
Sd/-
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
JUDGE DG/1.6.22
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 2279/2022
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CHARGE DATED 29/05/2014 IN CRIME NO. 683/2014 OF ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAM
Annexure A2 AFFIDAVIT DATED 09/02/2022 EXECUTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!