Shyma S vs The Panmana Grama Panchayat
2022 Latest Caselaw 9136 Ker

WP(C) NO. 26113 OF 2013            1



                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
     WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 5TH SRAVANA, 1944
                          WP(C) NO. 26113 OF 2013
PETITIONER/S:

               SHYMA S.
               RESIDING AT KALILIL PUTHEN VEEDU, VADAKKUMTHALA,
               KUTTIVATTOM JUNCTION, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM
               DISTRICT 690 536

               BY ADVS.
               SRI.R.RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI
               SMT.SABINA JAYAN



RESPONDENT/S:

      1        THE PANMANA GRAMA PANCHAYAT
               PANMANA, CHAVARA, KOLLAM 691 583,REPRESENTED BY ITS
               SECRETARY

      2        THE MEDICAL OFFICER
               COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, CHAVARA, KOLLAM

      3        ISMAIL KUNJU
               RESIDING AT KODIYATHU MEKKETHIL , VADAKKUMTHALA,
               KARUNAGAPALLY, KOLLAM 690 536.

      4        YOUSUF KUNJU
               PROPRIETOR, SANGAHAM RESTAURANT, VADAKKUMTHALA
               VILLAGE, KUTTIVATTOM JUNCTION, KARUNAGAPPALLY 690
               536.

      5        THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER KOLLAM 691 001.
 WP(C) NO. 26113 OF 2013           2


      6        THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
               KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT
               OFFICE, KOLLAM 691 001.

               BY ADVS.
               SRI.V.G.ARUN
               SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR
               SRI.JOBI JOSE KONDODY
               SRI.M.R.ARUNKUMAR, SC, POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD



OTHER PRESENT:

               SRI.JIBU.T.S, GP, SRI.T.NAVEEN, SC




       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
27.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 26113 OF 2013               3




                         P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
                   --------------------------------------------
                       W.P.(C.) No. 26113 of 2013
                      --------------------------------------
                  Dated this the 27th day of July, 2022


                                 JUDGMENT

The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayers

in the writ petition are infructuous.

Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

SD/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS