Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bharatheeya Jyothisha Vichara ... vs State Of Kerala
2022 Latest Caselaw 9015 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9015 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2022

Kerala High Court
Bharatheeya Jyothisha Vichara ... vs State Of Kerala on 27 July, 2022
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN

                                 &

        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR

 WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 5TH SRAVANA, 1944

                    WP(C) NO. 24263 OF 2022

PETITIONER:
         BHARATHEEYA JYOTHISHA VICHARA SANGAM, MAZDOOR
         BHAVAN, ASHRAMAM ROAD, CHINNAKKADA, KOLLAM - 691
         001.
         BY ADVS.R.KRISHNA RAJ
         R.PRATHEESH (ARANMULA)
         E.S.SONI
         KUMARI SANGEETHA S.NAIR
         RESMI A.


RESPONDENTS:
   1.    STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO
         GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (DEVASWOM),
         KERALA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPU-
         RAM - 695 001

   2.       DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT COLLECTORATE, 2ND
            FLOOR, CIVIL STATION, KUDAPPANAKKUNNU, THIRUVAN-
            ANTHAPURAM - 695 043.
   3.       TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, DEVASWOM HEADQUAR-
            TERS, NANDANCODU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003,
            REPRESENTED BY ITS SECERTARY.

            R1 & 2 BY SRI S.RAJMOHAN - SR.GOVT.PLEADER
            R3 BY SRI G.BIJU- SC, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD


     THIS    WRIT   PETITION     (CIVIL)    HAVING    COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION    ON   27.07.2022,    THE     COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                          -2-
W.P.(C). No.24263 of 2022



                                   JUDGMENT

Anil K. Narendran, J.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226

of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus

commanding the respondents, namely, the 1st respondent

State of Kerala; the 2nd respondent District Collector,

Thiruvananthapuram; and also the 3rd respondent Travancore

Devaswom Board, to permit 'Pithrutharpanam' at

Shanghumugham Beach, Thiruvananthapuram on Karkkidaka

Vavu. In the writ petition, it is averred that Shanghumugham

Beach in Thiruvananthapuram is considered to be an

auspicious place for performing 'Pithrutharpanam', since the

deities of more than five prominent temples come there to

perform 'Arattu'. The 'Arattu' festival of Sree Padmanabha

Swamy Temple, Shanghumugham Devi Temple, Chaakka

Chamundi Devi Temple, Vaduvathu Maha Vishnu Temple and

rituals of several other temples are performed at

Shanghumugham Beach. Lakhs of people utilize the facility

provided by the 3rd respondent Travancore Devaswom Board at

Shanghumugham Beach for performing 'Pithrutharpanam' on

Karkkidaka Vavu and auspicious days, with the co-operation of

W.P.(C). No.24263 of 2022

Government Departments. All these rituals are taking place at

Shanghumugham Beach for the last several decades. While the

Travancore Devaswom Board has taken all steps to conduct

'Pithrutharpanam' at Shanghumugham Beach on Karkkidaka

Vavu (28.07.2022), based on the decision taken in the

meeting held on 11.07.2022, as evidenced by Ext.P1 minutes,

the 2nd respondent District Collector has issued a prohibitory

order, as evidenced by Ext.P2 news report that appeared on

19.07.2022, prohibiting 'Pithrutharpanam' at Shanghumugham

Beach on Karkkidaka Vavu. On coming to know about such a

decision taken by the 2nd respondent, the petitioner submitted

Ext.P3 representation dated 18.07.2022, seeking permission

for conducting 'Pithrutharpanam' at Shanghumugham Beach

on 28.07.2022.

2. Today, when this matter came up for consideration

in the forenoon session, the learned counsel for the petitioner

has made available for the perusal of this Court an order dated

17.07.2022 of the 2nd respondent District Collector as the

Chairperson of the District Disaster Management Authority,

Thiruvananthapuram, which is one issued pursuant to the

decision taken in the meeting convened on 11.07.2022, as

W.P.(C). No.24263 of 2022

evidenced by Ext.P1. The learned Senior Government Pleader

has made available for the perusal of this Court a copy of the

report dated 03.07.2022 of the Station House Officer,

Valiyathura Police Station, which is one addressed to the 2nd

respondent District Collector. Considering the urgency of the

matter, we directed the learned Senior Government Pleader to

get instructions and the matter was ordered to be listed at

1.00 p.m for further consideration. The learned Senior

Government Pleader was directed to get few photographs of

Shanghumugham Beach and to send copy of those

photographs to the learned counsel for the petitioner through

WhatsApp.

3. When this matter is taken up for consideration in

the afternoon session, the learned Senior Government Pleader,

on instructions, would submit that the 2nd respondent District

Collector, who is the Chairperson of the District Disaster

Management Authority, Thiruvananthapuram has issued the

order dated 17.07.2022 based on the decision taken in the

meeting convened on 11.07.2022, as evidenced by Ext.P1

minutes. The report of the Station House Officer, Valiyathura

Police Station was also considered, before taking such a

W.P.(C). No.24263 of 2022

decision. The learned Senior Government Pleader has made

available for the perusal of this Court the photographs of

Shanghumugham Beach, which form part of the report of the

Station House Officer, Valiyathura Police Station.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner, placing

reliance on Ext.P4 photograph produced along with the writ

petition, would contend that the state of affairs in

Shanghumugham Beach is not as seen in the photographs,

which form part of the report of the Station House Officer,

Valiyathura Police Station. The prohibition imposed in the order

dated 17.07.2022 of the 2nd respondent is absolutely without

any valid reasons. Therefore, interference of this Court is

highly essential, since Shanghumugham Beach is considered to

be most auspicious place for performing 'Pithrutharpanam', for

the reasons stated in the writ petition.

5. The learned Standing Counsel for Travancore

Devaswom Board would submit that though the Board has

taken a decision on 29.06.2022 to make arrangements for

performing 'Pithrutharpanam' at Shanghumugham Beach and

other places on Karkkidaka Vavu (28.07.2022), the Board

could not proceed further in view of the prohibitory order

W.P.(C). No.24263 of 2022

issued by the 2nd respondent based on the decision taken in

the meeting convened on 11.07.2022. Though the said

meeting was convened without notice to the Travancore

Devaswom Board, a copy of the order dated 17.07.2022 was

communicated to the concerned Deputy Devaswom

Commissioner for information.

6. Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act,

1950 enacted by the State Legislature makes provision for the

administration, supervision and control of incorporated and

unincorporated Devaswoms and of other Hindu Religious

Endowments and Funds. As per sub-section (3) of Section 1 of

the Act, substituted by the Kerala Adaptation of Laws Order,

1956, Part I of the Act shall extend to Travancore, Part II of

the Act shall extend to Cochin and Part III of the Act shall

extend to the whole of the State of Kerala, excluding the

Malabar District.

7. Section 15 of the Act deals with vesting of

jurisdiction in the Board. As per sub-section (1) of Section 15,

subject to the provisions of Chapter III of Part I, all rights,

authority and jurisdiction belonging to or exercised by the

Ruler of Travancore prior to the first day of July, 1949, in

W.P.(C). No.24263 of 2022

respect of Devaswoms and Hindu Religious Endowments shall

vest in and be exercised by the Board in accordance with the

provisions of this Act. As per sub-section (2) of Section 15, the

Board shall exercise all powers of direction, control and

supervision over the incorporated and unincorporated

Devaswoms and Hindu Religious Endowments under their

jurisdiction.

8. Section 15A of the Act, inserted by Act 5 of 2007,

with effect from 12.04.2007, deals with duties of the Board. As

per Section 15A, it shall be the duty of the Board to perform

the following functions, namely, (i) to see that the regular

traditional rites and ceremonies according to the practice

prevalent in the religious institutions are performed promptly;

(ii) to monitor whether the administrative officials and

employees and also the employees connected with religious

rites are functioning properly; (iii) to ensure proper

maintenance and upliftment of the Hindu religious institutions;

(iv) to establish and maintain proper facilities in the temples

for the devotees.

9. The fact that Shanghumugham Beach is considered

to be an auspicious place for performing 'Pithrutharpanam',

W.P.(C). No.24263 of 2022

since the deities of more than five prominent temples come

there to perform 'Arattu' is not in serious dispute. It is also not

in serious dispute that 'Arattu' festival of Sree Padmanabha

Swamy Temple, Shanghumugham Devi Temple, Chaakka

Chamundi Devi Temple, Vaduvathu Maha Vishnu Temple and

rituals of several other temples are performed at

Shanghumugham Beach. For the last several decades, lakhs of

people utilized the facility provided by the 3rd respondent

Travancore Devaswom Board at Shanghumugham Beach for

performing 'Pithrutharpanam' on Karkkidaka Vavu and other

auspicious days. Before imposing any prohibition on the

performance of 'Pithrutharpanam' at Shanghumugham Beach

on Karkkidaka Vavu (28.07.2022), the District Disaster

Management Authority ought to have convened a meeting with

notice to the Travancore Devaswom Board. The procedure

adopted by the 1st respondent State and the 2nd respondent

District Collector, who is the Chairperson of the District

Disaster Management Authority, in convening a meeting on

11.07.2022 without notice to the Travancore Devaswom Board

is per se arbitrary and illegal. The conduct of respondents 1

and 2 in that regard has to be deprecated in the strongest

W.P.(C). No.24263 of 2022

words. From the submissions made by the learned Standing

Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board, we notice that the

Board has not taken any action to protect the interest of

people who used to perform 'Pithrutharpanam' at

Shanghumugham Beach on Karkkidaka Vavu, utilizing the

facility provided by the Board, despite the fact that the

decision taken on 11.07.2022 is without notice to the Board.

The inaction on the part of the Board in this regard has also to

be deprecated in the strongest words.

10. As already noticed hereinbefore, placing reliance on

Ext.P4 photograph produced along with the writ petition, the

learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the state

of affairs in Shanghumugham Beach is not as seen in the

photographs, which forms part of the report of the Station

House Officer, Valiyathura Police Station, and as such the

prohibition imposed in the order dated 17.07.2022 of the 2nd

respondent is absolutely without any valid reasons.

11. Since 'Pithrutharpanam' on Karkkidaka Vavu is

scheduled to be held on 28.07.2022 (tomorrow) and since the

Travancore Devaswom Board has not made any arrangements

for performing 'Pithrutharpanam' at Shanghumugham Beach,

W.P.(C). No.24263 of 2022

in view of the prohibitory order issued by the 2nd respondent,

we do not propose to go into the legality or otherwise of the

order dated 17.07.2022 of the said respondent. However, it is

ordered that, any decision taken in future by the District

Disaster Management Authority imposing prohibition on

'Pithrutharpanam' at Shanghumugham Beach shall be with due

notice to the Travancore Devaswom Board, except in cases in

which exigencies demand immediate decision by the said

Authority in exercise of its powers under the Disaster

Management Act, 2005 and the Rules made thereunder.

The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions.

Sd/-

ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE

Sd/-

P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE

AV/27/7

W.P.(C). No.24263 of 2022

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING IN WHICH DECISION WAS TAKEN TO PROHIBIT VAVUBALI AT SHANGHUMUGHAM BEACH DATED 11.07.2022

EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS PUBLISHED IN THE JANMABHUMI DATED 19.07.2022

EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY HINDU AIKYAVEDI DATED 18.07.2022.

EXT.P4: PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE PRESENT SITUATION OF THE BEACH DATED NI.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter