Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8909 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2022
WP(C) NO. 22125 OF 2022 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 16TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 22125 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
VICTORIA SHEPARD,
W/O. ROBIN M.K., MEMANA, ARAKKULAM PO, IDUKKI-
685591 (HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER (MATHS), ST. THOMAS
HIGH SCHOOL, THUDANGANAD)
BY ADV S.SUBHASH CHAND
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION
(FORMERLY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS),
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
3 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
THODUPUZHA-685584.
4 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
KANJIRAPPALLY-686507
5 THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
THODUPUZHA-685584.
WP(C) NO. 22125 OF 2022 2
6 THE CORPORATE MANAGER,
CORPORATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY, DIOCESE OF PALAI-
686575.
SMT NISHA BOSE, SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 07.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 22125 OF 2022 3
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court contending that she is
entitled to have her service regularised for the period from 01.06.2015 to
31.05.2016 in the cadre of Upper Primary School Teacher. When the
request made by the petitioner was denied, the petitioner is stated to have
preferred Ext.P5 revision petition before the 1st respondent. The prayer in
this writ petition is for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and
pass orders on Ext.P5 expeditiously, with due notice.
2. Heard Sri.Subhash Chand S, the learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner and Smt.Nisha Bose, the learned Senior Government Pleader.
In view of the nature of the order that I propose to pass, notice to the 6th
respondent is dispensed with.
3. After having carefully evaluated the contentions raised in this
writ petition, the submissions made across the Bar and the facts and
circumstances, I am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of at
the admission stage itself by issuing the following directions:
a) There will be a direction to the 1st respondent to take up,
consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5, after affording
an opportunity of being heard, either physically or virtually, to
the petitioner herein or her authorised representative and the
6th respondent.
b) Orders, as directed above, shall be passed expeditiously, in any
event, within a period of three months from the date of
production of a copy of this judgment.
c) It would be open to the petitioner to produce a copy of the writ
petition along with the judgment before the concerned
respondent for further action.
This writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE IAP
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 22125/2022
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPROVED APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 3.6.2013 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.6
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPROVED APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 1.6.2015 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.6
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER BEARING NO.25/2016 (2) DATED 8.8.2016 THUS PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.6
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPROVED APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 1.6.2017 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.6
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE STATUTORY REVISION PETITION DATED 6.5.2022 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE RESPONDENT NO.1
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
NIL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!