Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8860 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2022
WP(C) NO. 6873 OF 2012 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 16TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 6873 OF 2012
PETITIONER/S:
ABDUL RUSSAK
AGED 50 YEARS
ELECTRO-TECH INDUSTRIES, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, SOUTH
KALAMASSERY.
BY ADVS.
SRI.ASP.KURUP
SRI.SADCHITH.P.KURUP
RESPONDENT/S:
1 CHALAKKUDY MUNICIPALITY
MUNICIPAL OFFICE, CHALAKKUDY, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY.
2 THE SECRETARY
CHALAKKUDY MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE,
CHALAKKUDY.
BY ADVS.
SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR
SRI.S.A.ABDUL SALEEM
SRI.M.R.DHANIL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 07.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 6873 OF 2012 2
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
--------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No.6873 of 2012
--------------------------------------
Dated this the 7th day of July, 2022
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
A) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 1 st and 2nd respondents to make payment of Rs.64,575.50 to the petitioner since this is the amount remaining unpaid to the petitioner for which the goods have already been supplied and the same used by the respondents. B) Grant such other reliefs which are deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case." [SIC]
2. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the
respondent-Municipality is not paying the amount due to the
petitioner for the goods supplied. This writ petition is pending
before this Court from 2012 onwards. If there is any amount
due as on today to the petitioner, the petitioner is free to
submit a representation to the respondent-Municipality and
there can be a direction to the respondent-Municipality to
consider the same and take appropriate action in accordance
to law.
Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the
following directions :
1) The petitioner is free to submit a representation
narrating the grievance if any before the 2 nd respondent
within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of
this judgment.
2) Once such a representation is received, the 2 nd
respondent will consider the same and pass appropriate
orders after giving an opportunity of hearing to the
petitioner.
SD/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF SUPPLY ORDER NO.E1-7307/07 DT.26.9.07 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT TO PETITIONER
EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 13.12.2011 ISSUED BY PETITIONER TO THE SECONDR RESPONDENT
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!