Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8805 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 16TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 26902 OF 2015
PETITIONERS:
1 SWAPNAPRIYA, PEON, SASTHAMCOTTA CO-OPERATIVE
AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD., Q 373,
SASTHAMCOTTA P.O., KOLLAM-690521.
2 KRISHNA KUMAR
SANATHANA MANDIRAM, PERIVELIKKARA P.O., KARINTHOTTUVA,
KUNNATHOOR TALUK, THE SASTHAMCOTTA CO-OPERATIVE
AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. Q 373,
SASTHAMCOTTA P.O., KOLLAM-690521.
3 R.RAJEEV
LEKSHMI, PERIVELIKKARA, KARINTHOTTUVA P.O., KUNNATHUR
TALUK, THE SASTHAMCOTTA CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND
RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD., Q 373, SASTHAMCOTTA P.O.,
KOLLAM-690521.
4 PRIYA L. 'DEEPAM', MANAKKARA, SASTHAMCOTTA P.O.,
KOLLAM, THE SASTHAMCOTTA CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND
RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. Q 373, SASTHAMCOTTA P.O.,
KOLLAM-690521.
BY ADV SRI.P.N.MOHANAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE PART TIME ADMINISTRATOR
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
(GENERAL), SASTAMKOTTA, SASTHAMCOTTA CO-OPERATIVE
AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD. Q 373,
SASTHAMCOTTA P.O., KOLLAM-690521.
2 SASTHAMCOTTA CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL
DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD.Q 373
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SASTHAMCOTTA P.O.,
KOLLAM-690521.
3 ADDL R3.DINESH BABU
DILEEP SADANAM, MANAKKARA, SASTHAMKOTTA PO., KOLLAM.
(ADDL R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 19.01.16 IN IA
WP(C) NO. 26902 OF 2015
2
15724/2015).
4 THE MANAGING COMMITTEE
OF SASTHAMCOTTA CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL&RURAL
DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD, Q 373, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRESIDENT, SATHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM P.O-690521.
(ADDL R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED
28.09.17 IN IA 14849/2017).
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.P.JACOB
SMT.S.SINDHU
SRI.S.SHARAN
ADV.JOSHY THANIKAMATTAM (GP)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 07.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 26902 OF 2015
3
JUDGMENT
Sri.C.P.Sabari - learned counsel for the petitioners,
submits that his clients were not terminated pursuant to
Ext.P5 on account of the interim orders of this Court, as also
because the subsequent managing committee decided not to
take any further action.
In the afore circumstances, this writ petition is closed,
leaving open all contentions of the petitioners
Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE stu WP(C) NO. 26902 OF 2015
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26902/2015
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DT.9-1-2014 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER.
P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT.15-11-14 OF THE R2.
P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT.16-7-2013 IN WPC 30044/2011.
P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT.3-3-2015 IN WA 1119/2013.
P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DT.1-9-2015 ISSUED BY R1 WITH TRANSLATION.
P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE PART TIME ADMINISTRATOR WITH TRANSLATION.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!