Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8780 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 16TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(CRL.) NO. 487 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
JAMES BERNARD
AGED 59 YEARS
S/O BERNARD, THALAMITTATH HOUSE, THAIKUDAM,
UDHAYA ROAD, RIVER LINE, VYTILA - 682019.
BY ADVS.
MANSOOR ALI
BIJITH S.KHAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001.
2 THE STATE POLICE CHIEF
POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, VAZHUTHACAUD,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 014.
3 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
ERNAKULAM, 28CW+957, THRIKKAKARA, KAKKANAD -
682021.
4 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
MARADU POLICE STATION, PA ULLAHAN ROAD, NEAR
GOVT. VHSS, MARADU, KOCHI, KERALA - 682304.
5 SOUMYA BABY
D/O BABY, KIZHAKKETHADATHIL, OTTATHI
ARUVILANCHAL, KANTHIPPARA, UDUMBANCHOLA, IDUKKI
- 685619.
ADV PRASANTH,SR.PP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP
FOR ADMISSION ON 07.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE
SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(Crl) No. 487 of 2022
-: 2 :-
JUDGMENT
The prayer sought for by the petitioner is as follows:
"i) To call for the records leading to Ext.P1 and P2 from the Respondents
ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 4th Respondents to register FIR as per the Provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 and the Kerala Police Act 2011 and to submit a Report before the Learned Magistrate for Extortion, forgery, cheating against the Accused/ 5th Respondent taking into consideration of Ext.P1 Complaint filed by the Petitioner within a stipulated time as directed by this Hon'ble Court.
iii) To declare that the Petitioner is entitled to get register the FIR as per the Provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 and the Kerala Police Act 2011 for criminal conspiracy, forgery, misappropriation and cheating against the Accused/5th respondent taking into consideration of Ext.P1 complaint filed by the Petitioner.
(iv) To issue such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."
2. The grievances of the petitioner is that, he submitted
a complaint against the 5th respondent, before the 4th
respondent, and no action is taken on the same. The basic WP(Crl) No. 487 of 2022
-: 3 :-
prayer which he seeks is to register an FIR under the provisions
of Cr.P.C.
3. In M.Subramaniam and Another v. S.Janaki and
Another [2020 (16) SCC 728], it was held by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court that, in case of non-registration of FIR, the
remedy available to the complainant is to submit a private
complaint before the appropriate Court and a writ petition
under Article 226 of Constitution of India is not maintainable
for the said relief.
In the light of the principles laid down by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court, I do not deem it necessary to entertain this
writ petition. In such circumstances, this writ petition is closed,
leaving open the remedy of the petitioner in file private
complaint before the jurisdictional Court.
Sd/-
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A JUDGE rpk WP(Crl) No. 487 of 2022
-: 4 :-
APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 487/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 31.03.2022 FILED BEFORE 4TH RESPONDENT AND ITS RECEIPT.
Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE 3RD RESPONDENT AND ITS RECEIPT DATED 28/04/2022.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!