Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Uvaice vs The Axis Bank Limited
2022 Latest Caselaw 8626 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8626 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 July, 2022

Kerala High Court
Uvaice vs The Axis Bank Limited on 6 July, 2022
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
    WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 15TH ASHADHA, 1944
                       WP(C) NO. 29747 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:

          UVAICE
          S/O. HASSAN, AGED 33 YEARS
          POONAKUDIYIL HOUSE, PALLARIMANGALAM P O,
          PIDAVOOR KARA, VARAPETTY VILLAGE, KOTHAMANGALAM
          TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
          BY ADV T.A.KATHIRUKUNJU


RESPONDENT/S:

    1     THE AXIS BANK LIMITED
          REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, KOTHAMANGALAM BRANCH,
          ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-686691.
    2     AUTHORISED OFFICER
          AXIS BANK RETAIL ASSET CENTRE, 5TH FLOOR, CHICKAGO
          PLAZA, RAJAJI ROAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682035.
          BY ADVS.
          C.VIVEK
          SREEKALA KRISHNADAS


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C).29747/21                            2




                                    JUDGMENT

Petitioner has approached this court being aggrieved by proceedings

initiated under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and

Enforcement of Security Interest Act (hereinafter referred to as the SARFAESI

Act) against the petitioner by the 1st respondent bank.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the

proceedings are illegal and unsustainable. It is submitted that there is no

reason for the bank to take physical possession of the petitioner's secured

assets.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent bank submits

that the original application filed by the bank was allowed by the Debts

Recovery Tribunal on 4.6.2018. It is submitted that though the petitioner has

filed an application for setting aside the ex parte decree, it was dismissed by the

Tribunal on 7.4.2021 and the second application filed for the same relief is now

listed for consideration on 9.8.2022. It is submitted that there is absolutely no

effort on the part of the petitioner to make any payment towards the loan

account and the bank was, therefore, forced to initiate proceedings under the

SARFAESI Act. It is also submitted that proceedings are pending before the

Recovery Officer for recovery of amounts due under the certificates issued by

the Debts Recovery Tribunal on the original application filed by the bank.

Having regard to the aforesaid submissions, this writ petition is disposed

of directing that the petitioner may avail his remedies against any action taken

by the 1st respondent bank under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act before the

Tribunal by filing an application under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act. To

enable the petitioner to do so, the period during which this writ petition was

pending in this court, namely from 20.12.2021 till today (6.7.2022), shall be

excluded for the purposes of determining the period of limitation. Status quo

as on today shall be maintained for a period of two weeks to enable the

petitioner to seek appropriate reliefs from the Tribunal. It is made clear that

the above benefits shall be available to the petitioner only if he files the

application as aforesaid, within a period of ten days from today. The Tribunal

will be free to decide the matter in accordance with law and untrammelled by

any observation in this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P.

JUDGE okb/6.7 //True copy// P.S. to Judge

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 29747/2021

PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE WELCOME LETTER FROM THE 1ST RESPONDENT BANK.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT WITH LAND OWNERS AT CHINNAKANAL DATED 23.08.2014.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 10.12.2015.

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY NOTICE DATED 15.12.2015.

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL ORDER IN DRT DATED 4.6.2018.

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE EXPARTE SET ASIDE PETITION DATED 01.10.2019.

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCE FROM THE ADIMALI PANCHAYATH DATED 7.5.2015.

Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSIONER ADVOCATE'S NOTICE DATED 13.01.2020.

Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF M C NO.808/2018 DATED 18.12.2018 OF JFCM COURT, ERNAKULAM.

Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITIONER'S COMPLAINT DATED 13.11.2019.

Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.6935/21 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 29.10.2021. Exhibit P12 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION IN M A 270/2021 TO SET ASIDE EXPARTE ORDER DATED 19.11.2021 OF DRT-1, ERNAKULAM.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter