Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8473 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 July, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 15TH ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 20805 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
M/S ALWAYE FERTILISER INDUSTRIES (P) LTD.
KEEZHMADU, ALWAYE, PIN - 683 105. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SHRI.
SAFEER ABDUL KHADER
BY ADV K.N.CHANDRABABU
RESPONDENT/S:
1 KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD @ ORS.,
REGISTERED OFFICE: VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-
695001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
2 THE SPECIAL OFFICER (REVENUE)
OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL OFFICER (REVENUE) KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY
BOARD LTD VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695001
3 THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER,
ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, KSEB, ERNAKULAM.
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
KEEZHMADU, ALUVA, PIN - 683 105.
5 THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR,
.ALUVA TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT
6 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
ERNAKULAM, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANADU,PIN - 682030
7 *ADDL.R7.THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM PATTOM,
THIRUVANATHAPURAM -695001.
*(ADDL. R7 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 1/7/2022 IN I.A. 1/2022 IN
WPC 20805/2022)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.07.2022, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 20805 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
Challenge has been laid to the order Exts.P7 and P8 dated
23.5.2022 and 6.6.2022 issued by the Deputy Tahsildar under
Section 7 and 34 of the Revenue Recovery Act for non payment of
the arrears of electricity.
2. Petitioner is a Company incorporated under the
Companies Act and had been dealing with production of Magnesium
Sulphate, micronutrient fertilizer for the growth of the plant. For
the process of cycles, it takes a minimum of 36 hours which
requires an uninterrupted power supply. However in the year
1996, there was a power cut and the petitioner's electric connection
was disconnected in 1997. In 1996 a representation was made for
fixing the monthly quota and of not taking the penal action but of no
avail. It is contended that the respondents cannot raise the demand
of 1996 as it is barred under the provisions of Electricity Act.
Respondents came out with a one time settlement scheme valid
from 21.3.2022 to 20.5.2022 but there was no wide circulation or
publication of the same and petitioner could not avail the same in
time and when came to know about the fact, a representation
Ext.P11 dated 29.6.2022 has been submitted to the Chairman and
Managing Director.
WP(C) NO. 20805 OF 2022
3. Mr.B Premod, learned counsel appearing for the
respondent submitted that the period of the scheme is over but the
representation can be considered in view of the fact that the
arrears are of 1996. As per the judgment of the Division Bench of
this Court the limitation can be confined to 12 years as per Article
62 of the Limitation Act. But would not be averse in taking a call, in
case any order or direction is issued by this Court.
I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and appraised
the paper book. Concededly the respondents had come out with
one time settlement scheme valid from 21.3.2022 to 20.5.2022.
However from the records available, this Court has not been
apprised whether there was a wide circulation or notification so
that the people could opt and get away with the arrears by paying
lesser amount than the one due against them. The electric
connection was disconnected in 1997 and now has attempted to
revive and pay off the arrears and submitted a representation
Ext.P11. I am of the view that the respondents are required to take
a call on the representation unhindered by the fact that the scheme
was not widely circulated and brought to the notice of the effected
parties like the petitioner and decide the same in accordance with
law and the scheme, after affording an opportunity of hearing. Let WP(C) NO. 20805 OF 2022
this exercise be undertaken within a period of two months from the
date of receipt of a certified copy of the judgment. Till such time,
the operation of Exts.P7 and P8 is ordered to be kept in abeyance.
Sd/-
sab AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
WP(C) NO. 20805 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20805/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS:
Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE BOARD ORDER NO. 261/96
PLG.COM.2920/96 DATED 05.02.1996
Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE
PETITIONER DATED 3-5-1996 ADDRESSED TO THE SPECIAL OFFICER, REVENUE
Exhibit P3 A COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 6-10-1997 ALONG WITH THE ANNEXURE ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.HTB.20/1984 DATED 06.11.1997 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT DIRECTING THE PETITIONER TO PRODUCE A CERTIFICATE TO THE EFFECT THAT THE COMPANY IS UNDER LAY-OFF
Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY THE PETITIONER ADDRESSED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 18.11.1997 ENCLOSING THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED THE DEPUTY LAB OUR COMMISSIONER
Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 30.12.2014 SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY ACT NUMBERED AS RRC NO1021/3091/01 DATED 23.05.22
Exhibit P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, UNDER SECTION 34 OF THE ACT RRC NO1021/3091/01 DATED 25.05.22 TO THE PETITIONER WHICH WAS SERVED ON THE PETITIONER ON 06.06.2022
Exhibit P9 A TRUE COPY OF THE INVOICE NO. 20/1984/JAN/2001 FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY DATED 12.02.2001
Exhibit P10 A TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 12.06.202 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM .
Exhibit P11 A TRUE COPY OF THE PRESENTATION DATED 29/6/2022 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER COMPANY BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VYDYUTHI BHAVANAMPATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!