Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

V.S.Kunjumuhammed vs The Kerala University Of ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 8411 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8411 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 July, 2022

Kerala High Court
V.S.Kunjumuhammed vs The Kerala University Of ... on 4 July, 2022
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
        MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 13TH ASHADHA, 1944
                         WP(C) NO. 93 OF 2022
PETITIONER:

           DR. MOHANLAL E.K., ASSISTANT LIBRARIAN, COLLEGE OF
           VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES POOKODE, WYNAD, RESIDING
           AT FLAT NO.20, KENDRIYA BHAVAN, M.S.BABURAJ ROAD,
           KALLAI P.O., KOZHIKODE - 673 003.

           SRI.P.V.JAYACHANDRAN
           SRI.VENU MENON



RESPONDENTS:

    1      THE BOARD OF MANAGEMENT
           KERALA VETERINARY AND ANIMAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY,
           POOKODE WYNAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR.

    2      THE REGISTRAR, KERALA VETERINARY AND ANIMAL SCIENCES
           UNIVERSITY, POOKODE, WYNAD.

    3      THE DEAN, KERALA VETERINARY AND ANIMAL SCIENCES
           UNIVERSITY, POOKODE, WYNAD.

           SRI.RAVI KRISHNAN




     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.07.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).7525/2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 93 OF 2022 & con.case
                                       2



            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                    PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
   MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 13TH ASHADHA, 1944
                         WP(C) NO. 7525 OF 2022
PETITIONER:

            V.S.KUNJUMUHAMMED, S/O. LATE V.A.SULIMAN,
            ASSISTANT LIBRARIAN, CENTRAL LIBRARY, KERALA
            UNIVERSITY OF FISHERIES AND OCEAN STUDIES,
            PANANGAD P.O., KOCHI, ERNAKULAM, RESIDING AT
            VELLEKATTU HOUSE, CHELAKULAM, VENGOLA P. O.,
            PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM - 683556.

            SRI.P.V.JAYACHANDRAN
            SRI.VENU MENON



RESPONDENTS:

     1          THE KERALA UNIVERSITY OF FISHERIES AND OCEAN
                STUDIES, PANANGAD P. O., KOCHI - 682506,
                REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR.

     2          THE UNIVERSITY GOVERNING COUNCIL
                THE KERALA UNIVERSITY OF FISHERIES AND OCEAN
                STUDIES , PANANGAD P. O., KOCHI - 682506,
                REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR.

     3          THE REGISTRAR, THE KERALA UNIVERSITY OF
                FISHERIES AND OCEAN STUDIES , PANANGAD P. O.,
                KOCHI - 682506.

                SRI.N.SATHEESH




         THIS    WRIT    PETITION     (CIVIL)   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR
ADMISSION        ON   04.07.2022,    ALONG    WITH   WP(C).93/2022,   THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 93 OF 2022 & con.case
                                     3

                                  JUDGMENT

[WP(C) Nos.93/2022, 7525/2022]

The petitioners in these two cases are stated to be

working as Assistant Librarians; the first among them in the

Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies and the other

in the Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University. They

assert that they are entitled to be continued in service until the

age of 60, as in the case of "teachers", on the strength of the

judgment of a learned Division Bench of this Court in

W.A.No.1895/2016, a copy of which is on record as Ext.P9 in

W.P.(C) No.93/2022 and as Ext.P7 in W.P.(C) No.7525/2022.

2. However, the afore submissions of Sri.P.V.Jayachandran

- learned counsel for the petitioners in both cases, were

controverted by Sri.N.Satheesh - learned standing counsel for

the Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies and by

Sri.Ravikrishnan - learned standing counsel for the Kerala

Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, arguing that the

aforementioned judgment in W.A.No.1895/2016 has no

application as far as the petitioners in these cases are

concerned because the definition of the word "teacher" in the

said judgment which related to the Kerala Agricultural WP(C) NO. 93 OF 2022 & con.case

University, is completely different and distinct from the ones

appearing in the respective Statutes under which the two

Universities herein were created. They submitted that,

therefore, the petitioners cannot rely on the judgment of this

Court in W.A.No.1895/2016 to claim that they should be

allowed to continue in the services of the respective

Universities until the age of 60, when, admittedly, the

retirement age of Assistant Librarians is only 56 years as per

the University Statutes.

3. Even when I hear the learned standing counsel for the

Universities on the afore lines, the fact remains that it is

virtually conceded that the petitioners had been entrusted to

take classes - albeit for shorter durations - to aid certain

Sections of students. There is nothing on record, either in the

counter affidavit filed by the Kerala University of Fisheries and

Ocean Studies or by the Kerala Veterinary and Animal

Sciences University, explaining how the petitioners were

allowed to take classes, if they would not come within the

ambit of the definition of the word "teacher" in their

respective Statutes. This is crucial because, in

W.A.No.1895/2016, a Division Bench, certainly considered the

definition of the word "teacher" in the Kerala Agricultural WP(C) NO. 93 OF 2022 & con.case

University and found that when persons like the petitioners

therein were authorised to take classes, they should also be

construed to be so.

4. Of course, the benefit of the judgment in

W.A.No.1895/2016 would inure to the petitioners either if the

Statutes of the respective Universities involved in these cases

have pari materia definition, or if they were authorised by the

said Statutes to take classes. Therefore, the fact that the

petitioners were asked to take classes would certainly require

the University to answer their claims, which this Court cannot

do at the first instance, particularly when the provisions of law

and the factual circumstances are not still clear.

5. I am, therefore, of the firm view that the Universities

in these cases must consider the claims of the petitioners and

decide on their request for enhancement of retirement age on

par with "teachers", taking note of the fact that they were

asked to take instructions/classes for students under valid

orders/instructions.

6. Resultantly, I allow these writ petitions to the limited

extent of directing the competent Authorities of the two

Universities to hear the petitioners and take a decision on

their claim with respect to their retirement age, adverting to WP(C) NO. 93 OF 2022 & con.case

the judgment of this Court in W.A.No.1895/2016; thus

culminating in an appropriate order thereon, as expeditiously

as is possible, but not later than three months from the date of

receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Needless to say, until such time as the afore exercise is

completed and the resultant order communicated to the

petitioners, the interim orders earlier granted by this Court, to

the effect that the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.7525/2022 will

continue in service; while the retirement of the petitioner in

W.P.(C) No.93/2022 being subject to orders of this Court; will

remain in force.

Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE stu WP(C) NO. 93 OF 2022 & con.case

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 7525/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF KERALA UNIVERSITY OF FISHERIES AND OCEAN STUDIES ACT 2011.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE 1ST STATUTE IN RESPECT OF LIBRARIANS.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION NO.F.1-9/96(PS) DATED 8.6.1998

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF NEW AND RESTRUCTURED POST GRADUATE CURRICULA AND SYLLABI 2009.

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.ACAD1/2789/12 DATED 23.08.2012 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 8.11.2013 ISSUED BY THE PRO VICE CHANCELLOR OF 1ST RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT IN WA NO.1895, 1907, 1950 OF 2016 DATED 13.04.2018.

Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE NO.ACAD(3)/1120/2020 DAED 04.07.2020 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 12.01.2022 IN WP(C) NO.703/2022(K).

Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 28.02.2022 BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT WP(C) NO. 93 OF 2022 & con.case

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 93/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF PROCEEDING NO.GA/B/2773/2012 DATED 15/11/2012.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.ACAD/(2) 1355/2011 DATED 5/6/2013.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF SUBMISSION COVAS/PKT/ACAD/2341/2016 DATED 31/8/2016.

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING NO.KVASU/COVAS/ESST(I), 2611 (1) 2012 DATED 20/10/2017.

Exhibit P5           TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR
                     NO.KVASU/PKT/ACAD/2341/17 DATED
                     23/10/2017.

Exhibit P6           TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR

CVAS/PKT/ACAD/31339/2019 DATED 27/8/2019.

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR CVAS/PKT/ACAD.

31260/2020 DATED 21/12/2020.

Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE NO.KASE/COVAS/PKD/ESTT(1) 2611(1)/2012 DATED 8/9/2021.

Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON JUDGMENT IN WA NO.1895, 1907, 1905 OF 2016 DATED 13/04/2018.

Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE A REQUEST DATED 3/11/2021.

Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.KVASU/GA/A1/12180/2020(II) DATED 28/12/2021 WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter