Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 251 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 21ST POUSHA, 1943
RP NO. 34 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.08.2019 IN RSA 1027/2010 OF HIGH COURT
OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/4th RESPONDENT:
PADMINI GOPALAKRISHNAN, AGED 60 YEARS,
W/o GOPALAKRISHNAN, SHANKARASSERIL VELIYIL,
SANATHANAPURAM WARD, PAZHAVEEDU VILLAGE,
AMBALAPPUZHA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA - 688 561
BY ADVS. B.PRAMOD
NAMITHA JYOTHISH
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3:
1 SREEKUMAR, S/o SATHYABHAMA,
RESIDING AT JAGARIYA PARAMBU,
(KANNIMEL PURAYIDAM), KAITHAVANA MURI,
PAZHAVEEDU VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA - 688 009
2 KUNJUNNI CHAKRAPANI, S/o KUNJUNNI, RESIDING AT JAGARIYA
PARAMBU, (KANNIMEL PURAYIDAM), KAITHAVANA MURI,
PAZHAVEEDU VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA - 688 009
3 LAKSHMI SATHYABHAMA, D/o LAKSHMY,
RESIDING AT JAGARIYA PARAMBU, (KANNIMEL PURAYIDAM),
KAITHAVANA MURI, PAZHAVEEDU VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA - 688 009
4 LAKSHMI SOUDAMINI, RESIDING AT JAGARIYA PARAMBU,
(KANNIMEL PURAYIDAM), KAITHAVANA MURI,
PAZHAVEEDU VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA - 688 009
5 RAMACHANDRAN, S/o KUNJUNNI,
RESIDING AT JAGARIYA PARAMBU (KANNIMEL PURAYIDAM),
KAITHAVANA MURI, PAZHAVEEDU VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA - 688 009
6 THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
VAIDYUDHIBHAVAN, PATTOM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
RP No.34 of 2022 2
7 THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
ELECTRICAL MAJOR NORTH SECTION, KSE BOARD,
ALAPPUZA - 688 009
8 RAJENDRAN, S/o AYYAPPAN,
RESIDING AT HOUSE No.30/444, KANNIMEL PURAYIDOM,
KAITHAVANA MURI, PAZHAVEEDU VILLAGE,
ALAPPUZHA - 688 001
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.01.2022,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RP No.34 of 2022 3
ORDER
When the matter came up for hearing, it is fairly
submitted by the review petitioner that there is no
sufficient ground for maintaining this petition, but
pressed for an order to the effect that the impugned
judgment will not stand in the way of adjudication of the
issue afresh by the Additional District Magistrate before
whom the matter is now pending consideration. It is made
clear that the judgment rendered by this court will not
take away the authority of the Additional Magistrate to
decide the issue in accordance with the law in force. With
that observation, the review petition is hereby dismissed.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE DMR/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!