Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1234 Ker
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 8TH MAGHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 1083 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
BABU M.K.
AGED 44 YEARS
SON OF KANNAN, MARUTHULLA PARAMBATH HOUSE,
KUNDUTHODE P.O., KAVILUMPARA,
KOZHIKODE, PIN - 671513
BY ADV SANJANA R.NAIR
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE LICENSING AUTHORITY
DEPUTY CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES PETROLEUM AND
EXPLOSIVES SAFETY ORGANISATION,KENDRIYA BHAVAN,
BLOCK C-2, 3RD FLOOR. KAKKANAD,
ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682037
2 APPELLATE AUTHORITY AND CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES
CGO COMPLEX, 5TH A BLOCK, SEMINARY HILLS, NAGPUR,
MAHARASHTRA, PIN - 440006
BY ADV ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
OTHER PRESENT:
ASGI
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
28.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 1083 OF 2022 2
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:-
"i) To Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or
direction, directing the 1st Respondent to consider the application for
renewal submitted by the petitioner as evidenced by Exhibit P4
receipt and pass orders on the same as expeditiously as possible and
within such time period as may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court;
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other order or direction, directing
that Ext.P5 order shall not affect consideration of the renewal
application submitted by the petitioner;
iii) Issue appropriate writ or order, directing the respondents to renew
theExt.P1 License granted to the petitioner pending consideration of
the application for renewal as evidenced by Exhibit P4 receipt."
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned ASGI appearing for the respondents.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner
that the petitioner is conducting quarry operations in Nadapuram,
Vadakara and that he had Ext.P1 Explosive License which was valid
till 31.3.2021. It is submitted that on 28.10.2020 an order of
suspension was issued with regard to Ext.P1 licence which was also
been rejected by the Ext.P5. Since the licence is to expire on
31.3.2021, the petitioner submitted Ext.P4 application for renewal.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the same has
been duly received by the respondent on 31.3.2021 as is evident
from the seal affixed on Ext.P4. The learned counsel for the petitioner
relies on Rule 118(4) of the Explosive Rules and submits that the
application for renewal is liable to be considered without reference to
the suspension of the licence.
4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well
as the learned ASGI appearing for the respondents, I am of the
opinion that Ext.P4 application for renewal is liable to be considered
in accordance with law. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 1 st
respondent to take up Ext.P4 application for renewal submitted by
the petitioner and consider and pass orders on the same in
accordance with law, taking note of Rule 118(4) of the Explosive
Rules, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a
copy of this judgment.
This writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE ska
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 1083/2022
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLOSIVE LICENCS
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.
E/SC/KL/22/1322(E62702 DATED 28.10.2020
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 8130 OF 2021 DATED 30.03.2021
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF THE APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL DATED 31.03.2021 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30.08.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!