Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1890 Ker
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 29TH MAGHA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1159 OF 2021
JUDGMENT DATED 13.10.2017 IN WP(C) 31795/2017 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONERS:
1 DR. SAJI.K
CITY DENTAL CARE, VAIKOM P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 141.
2 DR. BREEZE TOMY,
SKIN SPECIALIST, VAIKOM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 141.
3 SIBI ISSAC,
VIKAS HOME APPLIANCES, VAIKOM P.O.,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 141.
BY ADVS.
M.R.NANDAKUMAR
MAYIKA SUNDAR
ARJUN ANIL
KRISHNA MOHAN P.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 2 & 6:
1 S.AANANTHAKRISHNAN, IPS,
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS), THE
EXCISE COMMISSIONER, EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE, VIKAS BHAVAN
P.O., NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.
2 SHIHABUDHEEN,
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN BY THE PETITIONERS),
STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VAIKOM POLICE STATION, VAIKOM,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 141.
3 ADDL. R3 & R4 IMPLEADED:
YOGESH GUPTA IAS
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS)
THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE
BEVERAGES CORPORATION, IVTH FLOOR, BEVCO TOWER, VIKAS
BHAVAN P.O, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695033.
(ADDL. R3 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 22/10/2021 IN
IA/1/2021 IN COC 1159/2021)
Contempt Case (Civil) No. 1159 of 2021
in W.P.(C). No. 31795 of 2017 :2:
4 S.SHYAMSUNDAR IPS
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS)
THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE
BEVERAGES CORPORATION, IVTH FLOOR, BEVCO TOWER, VIKAS
BHAVAN P.O, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033.
(ADDL. R4 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 14/01/2022 IN
IA/1/2022 IN COC 1159/2021)
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.P.HARISH, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER
SRI.NAVEEN.T, SC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 18.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Contempt Case (Civil) No. 1159 of 2021
in W.P.(C). No. 31795 of 2017 :3:
Dated this the 18th day of February, 2022.
JUDGMENT
This Contempt Case is filed complaining that the directives
contained in the judgment dated 13 th October, 2017 is not complied
with.
2. The subject issue relates to the shifting of an FL-1 shop.
However, today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the
learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri. M.R. Nandakumar, submitted
that already the shop is being shifted.
In that view of the matter, nothing remains to be considered in
this Contempt Case. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed.
sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE.
Rv
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!