Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1479 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
Wednesday, the 2nd day of February 2022 / 13th Magha, 1943
OP(C) NO. 204 OF 2022
EP 1005/2021 IN SGRCV NO. 16L/ 2020 OF THE PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM.
PETITIONER/ 2ND RESPONDENT/ 2ND JUDGMENT DEBTOR:
JOSEPH M C AGED 61 YEARS JOSEPH M.C, AGED 61 YEARS, SON OF CHEEKKU,
METTEKKATT, CHATHEDAM, THRUTHIPURAM. P.O. PUTHENVELIKKARA,
ERNAKULAM - 683594.
RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONER AND 1ST RESPONDENT/ DECREE HOLDER AND 1ST JUDGMENT
DEBTOR:
1. M/S.INDUSIND BANK LIMITED INDUSIND BANK LIMITED, NEW NO. 34, OLD
NOS. 115 AND 116, G.N CHETTY ROAD, T. NAGAR,CHENNAI - 600 017
THROUGH ITS BRANCH OFFICE, JAIN TOWER 2, VARAPUZHA ROAD, NEAR
RAILWAY BRIDGE, EDAPALLY, KOCHI - 682 024 REPRESENTED BY ITS P.O.A
HOLDER MR ANTHONY XAVIER.ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682024.
2. ROBIN. M J AGED 34 YEARS S/O JOSEPH
MC,METTEKKATT,CHATHEDAM,THURUTHIPURAM PO, PUTHANVELIKKARA,ERNAKULAM,
PIN - 683594
OP (Civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances stated in
the affidavit filed along with the OP(C) the High Court be pleased to stay
all further proceedings in EP No. 1005/2021 in SGRCV No. 16L/2020 on the
file on Hon'ble Principal Sub Court at Ernakulam, pending final disposal
of the above Original Petition.
This petition coming on for admission upon perusing the petition and
the affidavit filed in support of OP(C) and upon hearing the arguments of
M/S K.B.GANGESH & AMAL S KUMAR, Advocates for the petitioner, the court
passed the following:
[PTO]
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
================================
O.P.(C) No.204 of 2022
================================
Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2022
ORDER
O.P(C) No.204 of 2022 is an application filed
by the second judgment debtor in E.P 1005/2021
under Article 227 of the Constitution of India
seeking instalment facility to pay the amount due
as per award dated 12.03.2021. Thus it appears
that the petitioner has no other contentions.
2. Heard, the learned Counsel for the
petitioner. The petitioner's counsel was asked as
to whether 50% award amount due can be deposited
within a period of thirty days. The learned
counsel has not agreed for the same. However, he
agreed to pay some amount.
3. In fact, the prayer is only to grant
instalment facility. Therefore, nothing could be
gathered from the materials placed to interfere
with the execution of an award passed, legally.
However, having considered the prayer for
instalment facility, I direct the petitioner to pay O.P.(C) No.204 of 2022
or deposit Rs.2,50,000/- (Two lakh fifty thousand
Only) within thirty days from today, with liberty
to the decree holder to release the same (in case
of deposit).
Issue notice to the respondents. In the
meanwhile, the execution of the warrant of arrest
stands stayed till 02.03.2022.
Post on 02.03.2022 to verify whether the
amount ordered is paid or deposited.
Sd/-
A. BADHARUDEEN, JUDGE
Cak
02-02-2022 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!