Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.D Raphy vs Sunny
2022 Latest Caselaw 12509 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12509 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 December, 2022

Kerala High Court
K.D Raphy vs Sunny on 23 December, 2022
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                              PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
     FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 2ND POUSHA, 1944
                      OP(C) NO. 2498 OF 2022
EA 1073/2022 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT / COMMERCIAL COURT, THRISSUR
PETITIONER:

          K.D RAPHY
          AGED 60 YEARS
          S/O KONNIKARA DEVASSY
          KONNIKARA HOUSE, OLLU VILLAGE DESOM OLLUR P.O,
          THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR-680306.
          PIN - 680306

          BY ADVS.    K.I.SAGEER
                      MUHAMMED YASIL


RESPONDENT:

           SUNNY
           AGED 65 YEARS
           S/O ANTONY, ARIMBOOR HOUSE,
           KUTTANELLUR, THRISSUR-680014.
           REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER PIOUS
           S/O ARIMBOOR ANTONY, KANJANI THRISSUR-680014.
           PIN - 680014
      THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.12.2022,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 O.P.(C)No.2498/2022

                                   -:2:-




                 Dated this the 23rd day of December,2022

                          JUDGMENT

The original petition is filed to set aside Ext P5

order passed in E.A.No.1073/2022 in E.P.No.245/2013

in O.S.No.775/2010 by the Court of the Principal

Subordinate Judge, Thrissur.

2. The concise case of the petitioner, relevant

for the determination of the original petition, is: he is

the judgment debtor in the above execution petition

filed by the respondent to realise an amount of

Rs.2,75,000/- with future interest. The petitioner had

appeared before the court below and sought time to

pay off the decree debt in instalments. Due to the

precarious financial condition of the petitioner, he was

unable to pay the decree amount within the stipulated O.P.(C)No.2498/2022

time period. Thereafter, this Court by Ext P4

judgment, permitted the petitioner to pay the decree

amount in equated monthly instalments. Still, for

reasons beyound his control, he could not comply with

the conditions in the said order. Consequently, the

petitioner filed E.A.No.1073/2022 before the court

below, seeking enlargement of time to pay the

instalments. The court below, by the impugned Ext P5

order, has dismissed the application. Ext P5 is

unreasonable and unjust. Hence, the original petition.

3. Heard; Sri. K.I. Sageer, the learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner and Sri. K.B. Gangesh, the

learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

4. The question is whether there is any illegality

in Ext.P5 order?.

5. The request of the petitioner in the execution

petition was to permit him to pay off the decree debt in O.P.(C)No.2498/2022

equated monthly instalments. Thereafter, he

approached this Court and filed O.P.(C)No.2293/2021.

This Court, by Ext P4 judgment, directed the court

below to keep the execution petition in abeyance and

the petitioner to pay off the decree debt in eight

equated monthly instalments. The petitioner failed to

avail the benefit.

6. Undisputedly, the petitioner has not sought

for enlargement of time of Ext P4 judgment; instead he

moved the court below and sought for extension of

time.

7. The court below, by the impugned Ext P5

order, has rightly declined to interfere with the matter.

8. According to me, the original petition is not

maintainable, in view of Ext P4 judgment passed by

this Court. The proper course of the petitioner was to

move for enlargement of time in O.P.(C)No.2293/2021 O.P.(C)No.2498/2022

and not move the court below or this Court through the

present original petition. I dismiss the original petition

on the said sole ground. Nevertheless, Sri. K. B.

Gangesh, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner

has one more chance to pay off the entire decree debt

on or before 03.01.2023. The said submission is

recorded. It is upto the petitioner to avail the benefit

of the concession made.

With the above observation, the original petition is

dismissed.

Sd/-

                                      C.S.DIAS,JUDGE

DST/23.12.22                                          //True copy/

                                                      P.A.To Judge
 O.P.(C)No.2498/2022






                             APPENDIX



PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT-P1          A TRUE COPY OF THE DECREE DATED 09.03.2012

IN O.S NO.775/2010 ON THE FILES OF 2ND ADDITIONAL SUB COURT THRISSUR

EXHIBIT-P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION IN E.P NO.245/2013 IN O.S NO.775/2010 ON THE FILES OF THE HON'BLE SUB COURT THRISSUR

EXHIBIT-P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE AUCTION NOTICE ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL SUB COURT THRISSUR IN E.P NO.245/2013 IN O.S NO.775/2010 DATED 01.11.2021

EXHIBIT-P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.01.2022 IN O.P.(CIVIL) NO. 2293/2021 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT

EXHIBIT-P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 22.10.2022 IN E.A NO.1073/2022 OF THE PRINCIPAL SUB COURT-THRISSUR

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBIT: NIL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter