Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Xxxxxx vs State Of Kerala
2022 Latest Caselaw 12462 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12462 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 December, 2022

Kerala High Court
Xxxxxx vs State Of Kerala on 23 December, 2022
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                    PRESENT
                  THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
          Friday, the 23rd day of December 2022 / 2nd Pousha, 1944
               CRL.M.APPL.NO.1/2022 IN CRL.A NO. 1159 OF 2022
      SC 131/2017 OF SPECIAL COURT UNDER POCSO ACT, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI
APPLICANT/APPELLANT:

     XXXXXXXXXX

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:

     STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
     KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

     Application praying that in the circumstances stated therein the
High Court be pleased to suspend the conviction and execution of sentence
passed against petitioner by judgment dated 29/10/2022 in SC No.131/2017
by the Special Court for POCSO/Children's Act Cases and to enlarge the
petitioner on bail pending disposal of the Criminal Appeal
     This Application coming on for orders upon perusing the application
and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. R.T.PRADEEP, M.BINDUDAS,
K.C.HARISH, Advocates for the petitioner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the
respondent, the court passed the following:
                 DR.KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J.
               ====================
                        Crl.M.A.No.1/2022
                                 in
                    Crl.Appeal No.1159/2022
                 ==================
           Dated this, the 23rd day of December, 2022


                            ORDER

This application has been filed u/s 389(1) of Cr.P.C to

suspend the execution of the sentence.

2. The petitioner stands convicted for the offences

punishable under sections 450, 376(1)(2)(n) of IPC and sections

3(a) r/w 4, 5(l) r/w 6 of POCSO Act. He was sentenced to undergo

rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine

of Rs.50,000/- for the offence punishable under section 376 (1) r/w

375(a) of IPC, sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a

period of 20 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- for the

offence punishable under section 376(2)(n) r/w 375(a) of IPC,

sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to

pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the offence punishable under section

450 of IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a

period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- for Crl.M.A.No.1/2022 in

committing repetition of offence punishable under section 450 of

IPC.

3. I have heard Sri.R.T.Pradeep, the learned counsel for

the petitioner and Smt.Bindu, the learned Public Prosecutor. The

learned Public Prosecutor strenuously opposed the application.

The petitioner was aged 29 years and the victim was aged

16 years at the time of the alleged incident. Admittedly, the

petitioner and the victim were in love. The alleged sexual assault

on four occasions took place at the house of the victim, that too

in the mid night. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents. He

is in custody since 29/10/2022. Considering the pendency in this

court, there is no likelihood of taking up the appeal for hearing in

the near future. Taking into account all these facts, I am of the

view that the execution of sentence can be suspended on

conditions.

i) The execution of sentence shall stand suspended on

condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for

`1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent

sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the

court below and on further condition that the Crl.M.A.No.1/2022 in

petitioner shall deposit the entire fine amount within

one month at the court below.

ii) The petitioner shall surrender his passport, if any,

at the court below within one month. If he does not

have a passport, he shall file an affidavit to that effect.

iii) The petitioner shall not leave the State of Kerala

without the permission of the trial Court.

iv) The petitioner shall not enter into the jurisdiction

of the police station where the victim resides.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE Rp

23-12-2022 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter