Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12087 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 1ST POUSHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 42021 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 09-12-2022 IN MC 454/2022 OF CHIEF
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ,THRISSUR
PETITIONER:
PRAVEEN P.P
AGED 39 YEARS, S/O PARAMESWARAN,
PUTHEZHATHU HOUSE, LOKAMALESWARAM DESOM,
LOKAMALESWARAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 664.
BY ADV ARAVIND GHOSH
RESPONDENT:
THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
HEAD OFFICE AT KOVILAKATHUPADAM, THRISSUR.
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER,
GRACY C.A., KOMBAN HOUSE, PULLAZHI VILLAGE,
ELTHURUTH.P.O., THRISSUR, PIN - 680 611.
BY ADV P.C.SASIDHARAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
22.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C)No.42021/2022 2
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court challenging
proceedings initiated against the petitioner under the
provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of
Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
(SARFAESI Act), to recover amounts due under credit
facilities availed by the petitioner form the respondent Bank.
2. The record of the case shows that the petitioner had
earlier filed W.P.(C)No.23262/2017, which was disposed of by
Ext.P1 judgment, permitting the petitioner to remit the then
overdue amount of Rs.12,12,920/-, together with accrued
interest and costs in 10 equal monthly installments along with
regular EMI's. The petitioner has no case that he had
complied with the directions contained in Ext.P1 judgment
even in part. Presently it is the case of the petitioner that the
proceedings may be kept in abeyance to permit the petitioner
to sell the property covered by Ext.P3 Will Deed and to settle
the liability with the Bank.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent
Bank submits that there is absolutely no bonafides in the
submission now made. It is submitted that from 2017 till
2022, the petitioner has not made any substantial payment
towards the loan liability and the present overdue amount
itself is approximately Rs.53 Lakh. It is submitted that the
total liability is approximately Rs.74 Lakh. It is submitted
that the person who showed no bonafide for the past five
years, cannot be permitted to contend that he will settle the
liability by selling the property covered by Ext.P3 deed.
4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank, I
am of the view that the petitioner has not made out any case
for interference with the proceedings under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India. On a pointed question from this Court
as to whether the petitioner is willing to remit atleast
Rs.20 Lakh, as a condition for deferring the taking of physical
possession, leaned counsel for the petitioner states that the
petitioner has no means to pay Rs.20 Lakh presently and the
only way to settle the liability is by selling the property
covered by Ext.P3 deed.
5. This Court exercises very limited jurisdiction in
matters arising under the SARFAESI Act and therefore in the
above fact circumstances, it could not be proper to grant any
relief to the petitioner. This writ petition fails and is
accordingly dismissed.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE ats
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 42021/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit-P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN WP(C) NO.23262/2017 DATED 24/07/2017
Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND POSSESSION NOTICE OF THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER DATED 9/12/2022
Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF THE WILL DEED NO.53/1984 OF SRO KODUNGALLOOR DATED 1/12/1984
Exhibit-P4 TRUE COPY OF TAX RECEIPT ISSUED FROM LOKAMALESWARAM VILLAGE DATED 20/12/2022
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!