Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9870 Ker
Judgement Date : 31 August, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 9TH BHADRA, 1944
CON.CASE(C) NO. 846 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.02.2022 IN WP(C) 5089/2022 OF HIGH
COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONERS:
1 PRAVEEN KUMAR M, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. M. KUMARAN
SENIOR MANAGER (FORMERLY AGRICULTURAL OFFICER)
CREDIT PROCESSING CENTRE,
KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
NAIKS ROAD, KASARGODE - 671 121,
2 JOSENA JOSE, AGED 31 YEARS
D/O. JOSE JOSEPH,
SENIOR MANAGER (FORMERLY AGRICULTURAL OFFICER)
CREDIT PROCESSING CENTRE,
KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
KANNUR - 670 001.,
3 VIDYA RESMI C.V, AGED 38 YEARS
D/O.VAMADEVAN D
SENIOR MANAGER (FORMERLY AGRICULTURAL OFFICER)
CCMR DEPARTMENT, HEAD OFFICE,
KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
CO-BANK TOWERS, PALAYAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033.,
4 SREEJESH T, AGED 43 YEARS
S/O. T. BALACHANDRAN,
SENIOR MANAGER (FORMERLY AGRICULTURAL OFFICER)
CREDIT PROCESSING CENTRE,
KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
KOZHIKODE - 673 002.,
5 ASHA UNNI, AGED 42 YEARS, D/O. PUSHPODHARAN
SENIOR MANAGER (FORMERLY AGRICULTURAL OFFICER)
CREDIT PROCESSING CENTRE,
KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
KALPETTA, WAYANAD - 673 122.,
6 SARASWATHI K, AGED 48 YEARS, D/O. KAILASAM. K
SENIOR MANAGER (FORMERLY AGRICULTURAL OFFICER)
CREDIT PROCESSING CENTRE,
CON.CASE(C) NO. 846 OF 2022 ..2..
KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
THIRUVAMBADY P.O., THRISSUR - 680 022,
7 ANISH KUMAR V, AGED 48 YEARS
S/O. K. G. VASU PANICKER
SENIOR MANAGER (FORMERLY AGRICULTURAL OFFICER)
CREDIT PROCESSING CENTRE,
KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
MYLAPRA ROAD, PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 645.,
8 SINDHU T.S, AGED 48 YEARS
D/O. T. R.SIVAN,
SENIOR MANAGER (FORMERLY AGRICULTURAL OFFICER)
CREDIT PROCESSING CENTRE,
KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
KAKKANAD P.O., ERNAKULAM - 682 030,
9 RAHUL CHANDRAN N.R, AGED 42 YEARS
S/O. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
SENIOR MANAGER (FORMERLY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
OFFICER),
ASSET MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT,
8TH FLOOR, CO-BANK TOWERS,
VIKAS BHAVAN P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033.,
BY ADVS.
M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI
BRIJESH MOHAN
K.JAJU BABU (SR.)
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4 IN WPC:
1 P.S.RAJAN
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KINOWN TO THE
PETITIONER CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KERALA
STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., HEAD OFFICE, ,P.B.
NO. 6515, CO-BANK TOWERS, PALAYAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695033,
2 K.C. SAHADEVAN
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KINOWN TO THE
PETITIONER CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, KERALA
STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., HEAD OFFICE, P.B.
NO. 6515, CO-BANK TOWERS, PALAYAM,
CON.CASE(C) NO. 846 OF 2022 ..3..
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033, PIN - 695033
BY ADV GILBERT GEORGE CORREYA, SC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 31.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 846 OF 2022 ..4..
JUDGMENT
This Court, by Annexure-D judgment, directed the
1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P4 to
P12 representations therein submitted by the petitioners,
requesting the 1st respondent to publish the combined
seniority list of Senior Managers including Agricultural
Officers and to effect future promotions in the post of
Assistant General Manager from the said combined
seniority list, in accordance with law after hearing one of
the representatives of the petitioners, within a period of
one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the
judgment.
2. The contempt of court case is filed alleging that
the 1st respondent did not pass any orders pursuant to
Annexure-D judgment within the time stipulated therein
and without passing any orders in compliance with
Annexure-D judgment, promotions were made to the post CON.CASE(C) NO. 846 OF 2022 ..5..
of Assistant General Manager, overlooking the seniority of
the petitioners.
3. During the pendency of this contempt of court
case, the 1st respondent passed Annexure-I order dated
27.05.2022. According to the petitioners, Annexure-D
judgment has not been complied with in its letter and
spirit and that the filling up of the vacancies before
consideration of Exts.P4 to P12 representations amounts
to further flouting the directions of this Court in the said
judgment.
4. As directed by this Court, the 1 st respondent has
filed an affidavit, explaining the circumstances under
which Annexure-I order has been passed. On going
through Annexure-I order and the affidavit placed on
record by the 1st respondent, in as much as the 1st
respondent has considered Exts.P4 to P12
representations referred to in Annexure-D judgment and
passed Annexure-I order, I am of the view that the 1 st CON.CASE(C) NO. 846 OF 2022 ..6..
respondent is not guilty of any willful disobedience of the
directions in Annexure-D judgment for initiation of
proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Needless to say that, it will be open to the petitioners to
challenge Annexures-I, H and K orders, in accordance
with law.
The contempt of court case is closed accordingly.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SB/31.08.2022 CON.CASE(C) NO. 846 OF 2022 ..7..
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 846/2022
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER VIDE NO.
G.O.(P) NO. 119/2021/CO-OP DATED 2.08.2021 PUBLISHING THE RECRUITMENT RULES FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE RESPONDENTS
Annexure B TRUE COPY OF GOVERNMENT ISSUED ORDER VIDE NO.GO(MS).NO.209/2010/CO.OP DATED 29.11.2010
*ANNEXURE B TRUE COPY OF GOVERNMENT ISSUED ORDER VIDE NO.GO(MS)NO.209/2010/CO.OP DATED 29.11.2010 [*EARLIER ANNEXURE B IS SUBSTITUTED BY FRESH ANNEXURE B AS PROVIDED IN IA 1/2022 AS PER ORDER DATED 02.06.2022 IN IA 1/2022 IN COC 846/22]
Annexure C TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 7.10.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS
Annexure D CERTIFIED OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.02.2022 IN W.P.(C).NO 5089/2022OF THIS HON'BLE COURT
Annexure E TRUE COPY OF THE HEARING NOTICE VIDE NO.KSCB/HR/6292/2021-22 DATED 18.03.2022 ISSUED TO THE 9TH PETITIONER
Annexure F TRUE COPY OF THE ARGUMENT NOTE DATED 21.03.2022 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Annexure G TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 5.04.2022 ISSUED ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS.
Annexure H TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER VIDE NO.KSCB/HR/PROMOTIONS/333/2022-23 DATED 19.04.2022 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Annexure I TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27.5.2022 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 5TH PETITIONER CON.CASE(C) NO. 846 OF 2022 ..8..
Annexure J True copy of the order vide No.KSCB/HR/Promotions/2521/2022-23 dated 08.07.2022 issued by the 2nd respondent
Annexure K True copy of the order vide No.KSCB/HR/Promotions/2765/2022-23 dated 20.07.2022 issued by the 2nd respondent.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!